Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
98
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 43 53 72
1440p QHD 63 81 100 136
1080p Full HD 99 127 157 214

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 72
3840x2160 Medium 53
3840x2160 High 43
3840x2160 Ultra 33
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 100
2560x1440 High 81
2560x1440 Ultra 63
1920x1080 Low 214
1920x1080 Medium 157
1920x1080 High 127
1920x1080 Ultra 99

Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis

Road 96, a narrative-driven adventure from 2021, presents an interesting stress test for a high-end 2025 pairing like the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The measured FPS data reveals a system that is heavily bound by graphical settings and resolution, with the CPU showing significant headroom. The benchmark results indicate that this combo ranks 1249 out of 2903 tested combinations, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all tested pairings for this specific title. This placement suggests that while the hardware is modern, the game's engine responds in a way that does not fully utilize the CPU's immense capabilities, making the GPU the primary determinant of performance.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and clearly illustrates where the bottleneck lies. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces an average of 214 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, that number falls to 136 FPS, a significant 36% reduction. Pushing further to 3840x2160 at Low settings yields only 72 FPS, which is just over half of the 1440p figure and a third of the 1080p result. This steep decline in performance as pixel count increases is a textbook indicator of a GPU-limited scenario.

The scaling pattern becomes even more telling when examining the High preset. At 1080p High, the average is 127 FPS. At 1440p High, it drops to 81 FPS, and at 4K High, it falls to 43 FPS. The consistency of the performance drop across different presets confirms that the RTX 5060's rendering pipeline is the limiting factor. The data suggests that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being saturated at higher resolutions, preventing the CPU from pushing more frames. The 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS further reinforces this, showing that the most demanding settings combined with 4K resolution overwhelm the GPU.

This behavior implies that for enthusiasts aiming for high refresh rates at 4K, the RTX 5060 is not sufficient for Road 96. The data shows a clear ceiling; even with the CPU's powerful 12 cores and 24 threads, the frame rate is dictated by the GPU's ability to process pixels. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly punishing, with roughly a 47% performance hit on High settings (81 to 43 FPS), which is more severe than the 36% hit from 1080p to 1440p. This non-linear scaling suggests that the GPU is hitting a hard memory bandwidth or compute wall at the higher resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1249 out of 2903 places it in the lower-middle tier of all tested configurations for Road 96. This is a surprising result for a pairing that includes a 2025 flagship-class processor. The data implies that the game is not demanding on the CPU, so the 9900X3D's substantial processing power is largely left untapped. The ranking is therefore depressed by the RTX 5060's performance, which, while competent, is not designed for maxing out demanding titles at 4K resolutions.

When looking at the GPU's nearest rivals, the picture becomes clearer. The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, which is only 0.3% slower than an AMD Radeon 860M and 0.3% slower than a NVIDIA GeForce MX550. It is also only 1.2% faster than an AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. These deltas are minuscule, indicating that the RTX 5060's raw compute power is in a similar class to these other GPUs. The fact that a modern discrete GPU is trading blows with an integrated GPU like the 860M in synthetic benchmarks suggests that the RTX 5060 is positioned at the entry-level segment of the discrete GPU market.

The CPU, on the other hand, is a powerhouse. Its average benchmark score of 54762 is 0.6% higher than an Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and 1.3% higher than an Intel Core Ultra 5 245K. It is also 2% and 2.1% faster than the Intel Xeon 6505P and Intel Core i7-14700F, respectively. This data shows the 9900X3D is slightly ahead of its closest rivals, and its 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its high-end status. The disconnect between the CPU's strong synthetic performance and the combo's mediocre in-game rank highlights that Road 96 is not a CPU-intensive title.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus. This configuration provides a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz. These specifications are crucial for understanding the measured FPS, as the 8 GB VRAM capacity is a likely contributor to the performance drops at 4K. The data shows that at 4K Medium, the average FPS is 53, with a minimum of 45 and a maximum of 61. This frame time variance suggests that the GPU is struggling to maintain consistent performance, potentially due to memory constraints.

The fact that the RTX 5060's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is revealing. These are typically found in low-power or entry-level systems. The benchmark data positions the RTX 5060 in a similar performance bracket, despite being a dedicated add-in card. This means that while the GPU is capable of high frame rates at 1080p, it lacks the raw power to maintain playable framerates at 4K with higher presets. The 33 FPS average at 4K Ultra is evidence of this limitation.

The GPU's performance in synthetic tests, such as a Passmark G3D score of 20891 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787, provides a baseline for its capabilities. However, the in-game data shows that the GPU's role is to be the primary bottleneck. The 72 FPS at 4K Low versus the 214 FPS at 1080p Low demonstrates that the GPU's pixel processing throughput is the limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM is likely also a constraint, as Road 96 at 4K with high textures could easily exceed this allocation, leading to texture swapping and performance dips.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal balance between visual quality and performance is achieved at 2560x1440 with High settings. This configuration yields an average of 81 FPS, which is smooth for an adventure game. While the 1440p Medium preset offers a higher 100 FPS average, the jump to High provides a better visual experience for only a 19 FPS cost. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for this resolution, as it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

For users with 1080p displays, the Ultra preset is the best choice. The 1080p Ultra setting delivers an average of 99 FPS, which is more than sufficient for a smooth experience. The 1080p High preset offers 127 FPS, but the visual upgrade to Ultra is worth the 28 FPS reduction for many users. The 1080p Low setting achieves 214 FPS, but such high frame rates are not necessary for this genre, and the visual compromise is too significant.

At 4K, the data suggests that users should stick to Low or Medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. The 4K Low preset provides 72 FPS, which is workable, but the 4K Medium preset drops to 53 FPS. The 4K High and Ultra presets, at 43 and 33 FPS respectively, are not ideal for a smooth experience. The data implies that 4K is not a viable resolution for this GPU in this game if high visual fidelity is desired, and users should consider a resolution scale or lowering expectations.

FAQ

Q: Is this CPU-GPU combo good for playing Road 96 at 4K?

A: The data suggests it is not ideal. The average FPS at 4K is 43 on High and 33 on Ultra, both of which are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 4K Low, it reaches 72 FPS, but the visual quality is significantly reduced.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X3D perform compared to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and 1.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K. It is also 2% faster than the Intel Xeon 6505P and 2.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-14700F.

Q: What is the limiting component in this system for Road 96?

A: The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor. The FPS drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of GPU saturation. The CPU's powerful 12-core, 24-thread configuration has plenty of headroom, as evidenced by its high synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: The data shows that the High preset at 2560x1440 provides an average of 81 FPS. This offers a good balance between visual quality and performance. The Medium preset is faster at 100 FPS, but the High preset provides a better experience for only a 19 FPS reduction.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT?

A: According to the benchmark data, the RTX 5060 has an average score of 26331, which is 1.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT's average score of 26011. The performance difference is minimal.

Q: Does the game favor the CPU or GPU in this pairing?

A: The game heavily favors the GPU. The CPU, which ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, is not the bottleneck. The GPU, which ranks in the 72nd percentile, is responsible for the performance limits seen in the measured FPS data.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture. It features a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a substantial 128 MB of L3 cache. The CPU's synthetic benchmark scores are exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 and a single-core score of 6739. Its Passmark multithread score is 56154, and its Geekbench multicore score is 22884. These numbers place the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, demonstrating its immense processing power.

However, in Road 96, the CPU's role is minimal. The measured FPS data shows that the performance scales almost entirely with resolution and graphics settings, which are GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's powerful 12 cores are not being fully utilized, as the game likely does not have the threading overhead to take advantage of them. The high 1080p Low frame rate of 214 FPS suggests that the CPU can handle the game's logic with ease, but the GPU cannot keep up with the frame rendering at higher resolutions.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and the Intel Core i7-14700F. The 9900X3D outperforms both in synthetic benchmarks, with a 0.6% and 2.1% lead, respectively. This indicates that in a CPU-bound scenario, the 9900X3D would be the stronger choice. Yet, in this game, the CPU's advantage is irrelevant because the GPU creates a bottleneck long before the CPU's limits are reached. The data implies that for a game like Road 96, a less powerful CPU could achieve identical frame rates when paired with the same GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the performance is excellent across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 214 FPS, the Medium preset averages 157 FPS with a minimum of 133 and a maximum of 180, the High preset averages 127 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 99 FPS. This resolution is clearly within the RTX 5060's comfort zone, providing high frame rates even at the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains respectable. The Low preset averages 136 FPS, the Medium preset averages 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 and a maximum of 115, the High preset averages 81 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 63 FPS. The 1440p Ultra setting is the first to dip close to the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the GPU is starting to struggle with the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the performance is significantly compromised. The Low preset averages 72 FPS, the Medium preset averages 53 FPS with a minimum of 45 and a maximum of 61, the High preset averages 43 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 33 FPS. The data shows a clear trend: the RTX 5060 is not capable of delivering a consistently smooth experience at 4K for this game. The minimum FPS of 45 at 4K Medium suggests noticeable stutters may occur. The 33 FPS at 4K Ultra is essentially unplayable for a smooth experience, reinforcing the notion that 4K is not a viable option for this GPU in this title.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2497 MHz MHz
TDP 145 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 72.0
3840x2160 Medium 53.0
3840x2160 High 43.0
3840x2160 Ultra 33.0
2560x1440 Low 136.0
2560x1440 Medium 100.0
2560x1440 High 81.0
2560x1440 Ultra 63.0
1920x1080 Low 214.0
1920x1080 Medium 157.0
1920x1080 High 127.0
1920x1080 Ultra 99.0

Road 96 with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 5060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.