Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 33 | 40 | 55 |
| 1440p QHD | 48 | 62 | 76 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 97 | 120 | 164 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is a narrative-driven adventure that does not demand extreme hardware, but the measured data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with the Intel Arc B580 shows a clear hierarchy of settings and resolutions. The best experience is found at 1440p with High settings, which delivers a smooth 62 FPS average. While the 1440p Low preset reaches 104 FPS, the High settings provide a superior visual experience while still maintaining a framerate above the 60 FPS threshold; for many, the 1440p Medium preset at 76 FPS is the sweet spot, balancing visuals and performance. At 1080p, Medium and High settings offer excellent performance at 120 FPS and 97 FPS respectively, but the Ultra preset at 76 FPS still qualifies as playable. At the 4K resolution, the data shows a more demanding scenario, with the High settings yielding 33 FPS, and the Medium preset 40 FPS (with a minimum of 34 FPS), which is usable but not ideal for a game of this type. The Low preset at 4K delivers 55 FPS and proves to be the only way to get a smooth 60 FPS-class experience at that resolution.
Settings Recommendations
The data for Road 96 with the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B580 suggests that the Medium settings preset is the most balanced choice across most resolutions, but the optimal choice depends heavily on the target display. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset runs at 120 FPS average, with a minimum of 102 FPS and a maximum of 138 FPS. This frame pacing is excellent and leaves headroom for any single-threaded dips that might occur. The High preset at 1080p runs at a very stable 97 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p runs at 76 FPS, which is still very playable, but the step down in performance is significant for visual gains that may not be as noticeable in a stylized adventure game. The Low preset at 1080p, at 164 FPS, is only a choice for high-refresh-rate displays, and it does not reflect the game's visual intent.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset runs at a very solid 76 FPS with a minimum of 65 FPS, which is an excellent target. The High preset at 1440p runs at a smooth 62 FPS, which is also a very good target. The Low preset at 1440p achieves 104 FPS, but again the visual compromise is usually not necessary for this genre. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 48 FPS, which is noticeably lower and may not be ideal for a game that focuses on narrative pacing rather than twitch reaction. Therefore, the 1440p Medium or High settings are the optimal choices for a quality experience.
At 3840x2160, the data presents a stark picture. The Ultra preset runs at 26 FPS, which is not acceptable for a smooth experience. The High preset runs at 33 FPS, which is borderline, and the Medium preset runs at 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 FPS, which is a bit of a struggle. The Low preset at 4K runs at 55 FPS, which is the only playable option if one wants to use a 4K display. For the best experience on this combo, the recommendation is to use 2560x1440 with Medium or High settings. The data shows that 4K Ultra is not viable, but 1440p Ultra is a possibility at 48 FPS. The choice between Medium and High at 1440p is a matter of personal preference; the ~18% difference in average FPS is a measurable trade-off.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 is a discrete desktop GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors. It has a die size of 272 mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 80 ROPs. The memory subsystem is a 12 GB GDDR6 buffer on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The core clocks are a base and boost of 2670 MHz. The GPU is a PCIe 4.0 x8 card and has a recommended PSU of 450 W, and an 8-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot card with a length of 272 mm, a height of 115 mm, and a width of 45 mm. It supports HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The card is a 2024-12-12 release, and the launch MSRP is 249 USD.
The heavy memory bandwidth and capacity of the B580 are well-suited for Road 96. The game is not a typical FPS, but it does have a large amount of texture streaming and 4K rendering. The 12 GB buffer is sufficient for the highest resolution tested, and the 456 GB/s bandwidth is a strong asset for high-resolution textures. The GPU does not have a high TDP (190 W), and the pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. The data shows that the B580 is far more than enough for 1080p, and is even at 1440p. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at high and ultra settings, as seen by the sharp drop in FPS. The 4K High setting average of 33 FPS indicates a heavy load on the GPU, and the 4K Ultra at 26 FPS is a sign of a very heavy load. The bottleneck is the GPU's raw output, not the memory or bandwidth. The GPU's performance in the benchmark database is 68th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 23021, and its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The delta percentages to these rivals are -0.2%, 0.6%, and -0.7%, respectively. This suggests the B580 is a solid mid-range performer.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Road 96 with the Intel Arc B580 and Ryzen 5 7600?
A: The data shows the best balance of visual quality and performance at 2560x1440. With Medium settings, the average FPS is 76, and with High settings it is 62 FPS. At 1080p, the High settings run at 97 FPS, and at 4K the Low settings run at 55 FPS, which is the only playable 4K setting.
Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 1080p with this hardware?
A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 runs at an average of 76 FPS. It's not as high as the Medium (120 FPS) or High (97 FPS), but it is still a solid frame rate. At 1440p, the Ultra preset drops to 48 FPS, which is not as smooth a target.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of raw score?
A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172). The delta percentages are -0.2%, 0.6%, -0.7%, respectively, meaning the B580 is nearly a statistical tie with these cards in the aggregate benchmark.
Q: Is the 4K resolution worth playing?
A: Only with Low settings is the 4K experience at a decent frame rate: 55 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K runs at 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 FPS, and the High at 33 FPS, so these are not ideal for a smooth experience. The Ultra at 4K averages 26 FPS, which is not a playable frame rate for most.
Q: What is the minimum FPS on the Medium settings at 1080p?
A: The measured minimum FPS at 1080p Medium is 102, with an average of 120 FPS and a maximum of 138 FPS. This shows that the game is stable, with minimal frame pacing issues.
Q: Does the CPU have a significant impact on Road 96's performance?
A: The CPU has a strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735 and a single-core score of 1852. The game is not as CPU-intensive as some others, but the Ryzen 5 7600's 6 cores/12 threads and 5.1 GHz boost clock ensure it is not a bottleneck in the 1080p and 1440p results. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data spans three resolutions and four settings presets. The data is as follows:
3840x2160 (4K)
- Low: 55 FPS (average)
- Medium: 40 FPS (average), 34 FPS (min), 46 FPS (max)
- High: 33 FPS (average)
- Ultra: 26 FPS (average)
2560x1440 (1440p)
- Low: 104 FPS (average)
- Medium: 76 FPS (average); 65 FPS (min); 88 FPS (max)
- High: 62 FPS (average)
- Ultra: 48 FPS (average)
1920x1080 (1080p)
- Low: 164 FPS (average)
- Medium: 120 FPS (average); 102 FPS (min); 138 FPS (max)
- High: 97 FPS (average)
- Ultra: 76 FPS (average)
The data shows a clear hierarchy of performance. At each resolution, the Low preset is the fastest, followed by Medium, then High, then Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra is not linear, with the biggest drop happening between High and Ultra. For example, at 1080p, the drop from High to Ultra is 21 FPS (97 to 76), while the drop from Medium to High is 23 FPS (120 to 97). At 1440p, the drop from Medium to High is 14 FPS (76 to 62), and from High to Ultra is 14 FPS (62 to 48). At 4K, the drop from Medium to High is 7 FPS (40 to 33), and from High to Ultra is 7 FPS (33 to 26).
The minimum FPS data is only available for the Medium preset. At 1080p, the minimum is 102 FPS, which is a good floor. At 1440p, the minimum is 65 FPS, which is still a solid floor. At 4K, the minimum is 34 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target but still playable. The lack of minimum data for other settings suggests that the frame pacing is more stable, but the average numbers are still crucial.
The performance at 1080p is more than sufficient for any display, as even the Ultra preset runs at 76 FPS. The 1440p is the sweet spot, with Medium running at 76 FPS and High at 62 FPS. The 4K is the most demanding, with only the Low preset reaching a 55 FPS average, and Medium at 40 FPS, which is a tough sell for a smooth experience.
Resolution Scaling
The scaling from 1080p to 4K is severe. At the Medium preset, the FPS drops from 120 at 1080p to 76 at 1440p and then to 40 at 4K. This is a drop of 36.7% from 1080p to 1440p, and then a further 47.4% drop from 1440p to 4K. In absolute terms, the 1080p to 4K drop is a 67% decrease in average FPS. This scaling curve is typical of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p, the GPU is less limited, but the frame rate is still high enough that the CPU is not the limiting factor. At 4K, the GPU is working much harder, and the frame rate is much lower. The 4K Low, Medium, High, and Ultra are 55, 40, 33, and 26 FPS respectively. This is a clear sign that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K.
For the High preset, the scaling is from 97 FPS at 1080p to 62 at 1440p (-36%) and then to 33 at 4K (-46.8%). The Ultra preset goes from 76 at 1080p to 48 at 1440p (-36.8%) to 26 at 4K (-45.8%). The Low preset is the most extreme: 164 at 1080p, 104 at 1440p (-36.6%), and 55 at 4K (-47.1%). The consistency of the drop percentage across all presets (around 36-37% from 1080p to 1440p, and then 45-47% from 1440p to 4K) reveals that the scaling is very geometric, which is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU is not holding back the frame rate at any resolution.
The resolution scaling data shows that the 1080p to 1440p drop is around 36-37% across all presets. This is a significant drop, but it leaves the frame rates at a good level for 1440p. The 1440p to 4K drop is much larger, around 46-47%, which is a sign of a much heavier load on the GPU. The 4K results are only playable at Low settings, and even then, the 55 FPS average is close to the 60 FPS standard. This scaling behavior is expected for a GPU that is not a high-end 4K card.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, on the AMD Socket AM5 as a desktop segment. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz and its boost clock is 5.10 GHz. It has a 65W TDP. It has an L1 cache of 64 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 32 MB. It supports DDR5-5200 memory with a dual-channel bus. The 7600 has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU is based on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with a transistor count of 6,570 million. It has a single-thread score of 1852 and a multi-thread score of 12735 in Cinebench R23. In Geekbench, the single-core score is 2521, and the multi-core is 13413. The PassMark multi-thread score is 27058, and the single-thread is 3910. The CPU's percentile is 78th, with an average benchmark score of 26324. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (score 26274, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (score 26402, delta -0.3%), the Intel Core i9-11900KF (score 26212, delta 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (score 26187, delta 0.5%). This places the Ryzen 5 7600 as a strong mid-range CPU that is within 0.5% of its immediate rivals.
In this game, the CPU is not the bottleneck at any of the tested resolutions. The 6 cores and 12 threads are more than sufficient for Road 96. The game is a single-player adventure, and the CPU data shows that the 7600 provides a high single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core of 1852, PassMark single-thread of 3910). The CPU is not the limiting factor at 4K, as the frame rate scales with resolution and the GPU's load increases. The CPU's performance in 3DMark shows a 16-thread score of 6499, and a single-thread score of 999. The CPU's boost clock of 5.1 GHz ensures that the game's logic and physics are handled quickly. The data shows that the game is not demanding enough to fully utilize the 12 threads, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance is a plus. The 6 cores and 12 threads are more than enough for a game of this type. At 1080p, the high frame rates (164 FPS at Low) show that the CPU is not a limiting factor, as the frame rate is not capped by the CPU. The 4K results also confirm that the CPU is not the bottleneck, as the frame rate drops to the GPU's level. The Ryzen 5 7600 sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, indicating a strong overall performance, but in Road 96, it is the GPU that determines the final frame rate. The CPU's role is to provide consistent frame pacing, and the data shows that the 7600 is up to the task.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + Intel Arc B580 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 55.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 104.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 76.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 62.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 164.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 120.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 97.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.