Road 96

# CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename) using TSMC's 7 nm process. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU has a 16 MB L3 cache and 512 KB L2 per core, with a 65 W TDP. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5600GT shows strong multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 17,272, while the single-core score is 2,438. The Geekbench multi-core score is 7,986 and single-core is 1,843. The PassMark multithread score is 20,325, with a single-thread score of 3,348. In 3DMark tests, the max-threads score is 5,554, while the single-thread score is 913.

The processor sits in the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20,733. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12490F (average score 20,802, delta -0.3%), the Intel Xeon 6325P (20,821, delta -0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (20,826, delta -0.4%). These deltas are marginal — all within 0.5% — meaning the 5600GT performs essentially on par with these competitors in aggregate benchmarks.

For Road 96, an adventure game, the CPU's role is moderate but not trivial. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 354 FPS average. At 1080p Ultra, it drops to 164 FPS. This 190 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at the same resolution indicates that game settings significantly affect the workload, but the CPU's 6-core/12-thread configuration with a 4.6 GHz boost clock is sufficient to feed the GPU at high frame rates. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,794 and 4-thread score of 3,446 suggest that the game likely benefits from the processor's per-core strength, as adventure titles typically rely on fewer threads with higher single-thread performance.

The CPU's 16 MB L3 cache is notable for a processor in this class, and the dual-channel DDR4 memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s ensures data can flow to the cores without bottlenecking. The PassMark data compression score of 258,882 and integer math score of 69,566 indicate strong general-purpose compute, which supports game logic, AI, and physics calculations.

# GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 2,205 MHz and a boost clock of 2,505 MHz. Memory runs at 1,400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth with 16 GB of GDDR6X VRAM.

The RTX 4080's raw compute capabilities are substantial. Its FP32 throughput is 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has a TDP of 320 W and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector with a suggested 700 W PSU.

In GPU benchmarks, the RTX 4080 scores 34,457 in PassMark G3D, 21,4739 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 263,779 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,567. The GPU sits in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rivals include the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209, delta 0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828, delta -1.1%), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, delta -2.6%). The RTX 4080 trails the SUPER by just 0.1%, making them effectively identical in aggregate performance.

In Road 96, the GPU's role is dominant at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the combo delivers 55 FPS average, while at 4K Low it reaches 119 FPS. The 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for this game, as adventure titles typically do not consume large memory pools. The GDDR6X memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s allows for high texture throughput without stuttering. The boost clock of 2,505 MHz ensures the GPU can maintain high frame rates, but the data shows that at 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor — the 354 FPS at Low settings is likely near the CPU's maximum frame delivery capability, while the GPU could theoretically push higher.

# FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this CPU+GPU combo in Road 96?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 354 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the peak frame rate across all tested configurations.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209. The delta is +0.1% in favor of the RTX 4080, meaning the two GPUs are statistically indistinguishable in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT sits in the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20,733. This places it above the median but below top-tier processors.

Q: How much does the average FPS drop when moving from 1080p High to 4K High?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the combo achieves 209 FPS average. At 3840x2160 High, it drops to 71 FPS. This represents a reduction of 138 FPS, or approximately 66% lower performance at 4K.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the measured minimum FPS is 140 and the maximum is 190, with an average of 165 FPS. This spread of 50 FPS indicates some scene-to-scene variability.

Q: How does the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score compare to its single-core score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 17,272, while the single-core score is 2,438. The multi-core score is approximately 7.1 times higher, reflecting the scaling across 6 cores and 12 threads.

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combo ranks 257th out of 3,713 tested combinations in Road 96. This places it in the top 7% of all tested combos. The ranking reflects the strong GPU performance offset by a mid-range CPU. The RTX 4080's 86th percentile GPU standing drives most of the combo's high placement, while the 5600GT's 74th percentile CPU standing is adequate but not exceptional.

In comparison to other combos, this pairing sits well above the median but below combos featuring top-tier CPUs like the Ryzen 9 series or Intel Core i9 processors paired with the same GPU. The 257th rank out of 3,713 suggests that approximately 2,800 other combinations perform worse, while about 256 perform better. Given that the RTX 4080 is the dominant component, the ranking is likely limited by the CPU's ability to keep up at lower resolutions where frame rates are CPU-bound.

The data indicates that the combo performs proportionally better at higher resolutions. At 4K, the GPU is the bottleneck, and the 5600GT's performance is sufficient. At 1080p, the CPU becomes more relevant, and the 5600GT's 74th percentile standing may allow other combos with stronger CPUs to pull ahead in frame rates. The 3DMark max-threads score of 5,554 and single-thread score of 913 highlight the CPU's balanced but not class-leading performance.

# Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate.

At 1920x1080, all settings presets deliver playable frame rates. Low settings achieve 354 FPS, Medium 260 FPS, High 209 FPS, and Ultra 164 FPS. For 1080p users with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or above), High settings at 209 FPS provide an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra at 164 FPS still exceeds 144Hz, so it is also viable for those prioritizing visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 165 FPS average with a minimum of 140 FPS, making it suitable for 144Hz displays. High settings at 133 FPS are also viable for 120Hz monitors. Ultra drops to 104 FPS, which is still smooth for 100Hz displays. Low settings at 226 FPS are unnecessary for most users given the visual compromise.

At 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. Medium settings deliver 87 FPS average with a minimum of 74 FPS, which is playable on 60Hz displays and borderline for 90Hz panels. High settings at 71 FPS are also acceptable for 60Hz displays. Ultra drops to 55 FPS, which may feel less fluid on 60Hz screens. Low at 119 FPS is the only preset that exceeds 100 FPS at 4K, but the visual trade-off is significant.

The best overall experience per the measured rows is 1440p Medium or High, depending on whether minimum frame rate (140 FPS at Medium) or average frame rate (133 FPS at High) matters more. For 4K users, Medium is the recommended preset, as it maintains a 74 FPS minimum and 87 FPS average, ensuring smooth gameplay without dropping to Ultra's 55 FPS.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: 354 FPS average
• Medium: 260 FPS average, 221 FPS minimum, 298 FPS maximum
• High: 209 FPS average
• Ultra: 164 FPS average

At 1080p, the combo delivers exceptionally high frame rates across all presets. Even Ultra settings exceed 160 FPS, meaning the CPU+GPU pair can drive high-refresh-rate monitors without compromise. The spread from Low to Ultra is 190 FPS, showing that settings significantly impact performance at this resolution.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: 226 FPS average
• Medium: 165 FPS average, 140 FPS minimum, 190 FPS maximum
• High: 133 FPS average
• Ultra: 104 FPS average

At 1440p, the frame rates remain high but the impact of settings becomes more pronounced. The gap between Low and Ultra is 122 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 140 FPS ensures consistent frame pacing even in demanding scenes.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: 119 FPS average
• Medium: 87 FPS average, 74 FPS minimum, 101 FPS maximum
• High: 71 FPS average
• Ultra: 55 FPS average

At 4K, the GPU's workload increases substantially. The difference between Low and Ultra is 64 FPS, and Ultra drops below 60 FPS. Medium is the only preset that maintains a minimum above 70 FPS, making it the safest choice for 4K gaming on 60Hz displays.

# Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component at each resolution. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 354 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound given the RTX 4080's capability. Moving to 1440p Low drops to 226 FPS, a 36% reduction. At 4K Low, the frame rate falls to 119 FPS, a 66% reduction from 1080p.

This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient, but the rendering workload at 4K demands more from the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 5600GT's 6 cores are adequate to keep up at 4K, as the GPU is the limiting factor.

Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3,348 PassMark single-thread score) likely caps frame rates. The 354 FPS at Low suggests the CPU can deliver roughly 350+ FPS in this title, but the GPU could theoretically push higher if the CPU allowed. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,794 and 4-thread score of 3,446 indicate that the CPU's per-core strength is moderate, which matters at low resolutions.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings. For High, the drop is from 209 to 133 FPS (36% reduction). For Medium, 260 to 165 FPS (37% reduction). For Ultra, 164 to 104 FPS (37% reduction). This uniform scaling suggests the GPU is the bottleneck at these resolutions, as the CPU can maintain its frame delivery.

From 1440p to 4K, the drops are more dramatic. High goes from 133 to 71 FPS (47% reduction). Medium from 165 to 87 FPS (47% reduction). Ultra from 104 to 55 FPS (47% reduction). Low from 226 to 119 FPS (47% reduction). This consistent 47% reduction across all presets confirms the GPU is fully saturated at 4K, with the CPU playing a minimal role.

The data shows that for this combo, the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p, while the GPU limits performance at 1440p and 4K. Users seeking maximum frame rates should play at 1080p, while those prioritizing resolution should use 1440p Medium or High for the best balance.