Revolution Idle

Revolution Idle is not a typical twitch shooter, but the benchmark data for this Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination reveals how a high-end GPU interacts with a mid-range CPU in this specific idle title. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, based on Raptor Lake architecture, provide a solid foundation for background processes and the game's persistent simulation logic. With a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, the processor demonstrates strong single-threaded performance in synthetic tests like Geekbench single-core (1996) and Cinebench R23 single-core (3191), which matters for the game's UI responsiveness. The multi-threaded scores, such as Passmark multithread (25032) and Cinebench R23 multicore (22604), indicate that the CPU is more than capable of handling the game's calculations without becoming a bottleneck, even when paired with a GPU that sits in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Core i5-13400F's specifications are central to understanding the measured frame rates. The processor offers 10 cores (Raptor Lake-S architecture) and 16 threads, with a 20 MB shared L3 cache. In the context of Revolution Idle, which is an incremental game, the workload is likely not heavily threaded but does require consistent, low-latency processing for game state updates. The benchmark results support this: the CPU scores 960 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1880 in 3dmark_2_threads, while scaling up to 7314 in 3dmark_16_threads. This scaling pattern suggests the game benefits from additional threads up to a point, but the single-thread performance is what drives the smoothness of the user interface and menu interactions.

The CPU's performance percentile against all CPUs is 77, placing it above the median but not at the top tier. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is essentially on par with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (deltaPct: 0) and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (deltaPct: 0.4). It is marginally behind the Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (both at -0.3 deltaPct). In practical terms for this game, these differences are negligible; the CPU is not the limiting factor in the measured FPS. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz is crucial for maintaining high frame rates, as the game's core loop likely runs on a single main thread. The 65W TDP also suggests that thermal throttling is unlikely to be a concern in a standard desktop chassis, allowing the CPU to sustain its boost clocks during extended play sessions.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database, this specific CPU and GPU combination holds a combo rank of 69 out of 2986 tested combos for Revolution Idle. This places the system in the top 2.3% of all tested configurations, which is a strong indicator of overall capability. The high rank is primarily driven by the GPU's massive compute power, but it also confirms that the i5-13400F does not significantly hamper the system. In a game like this, where the GPU is typically the dominant factor for rendering, the 69th rank suggests that nearly all other combinations that rank higher likely feature even more powerful CPUs, though the FPS differences would be minimal. The data implies that this combo delivers near-top-tier performance, with the CPU's mid-range standing (77th percentile) having little negative impact on the final outcome compared to what a more expensive processor might achieve.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 176. This is a high frame rate that will provide a very smooth experience on most displays.

Q: Will the Intel Core i5-13400F bottleneck the RTX 5090 D in this game?

A: The benchmark data indicates no significant bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread score of 3634 in Passmark single_thread is robust, and the combo's 69th rank out of 2986 combinations suggests the pairing is well-balanced for this title. The CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to reach the frame rates shown.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 170 on Low settings to 83 on Ultra settings. This represents a 51% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset, showing a significant performance cost for the higher visual fidelity.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB of VRAM useful for Revolution Idle?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory, but given that the game is an idle title, it is unlikely to use a significant portion of this capacity. The measured frame rates are high across all settings, so the VRAM is not a limiting factor in any of the tested configurations.

Q: How does this combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rates range from 94 FPS on Low settings to 43 FPS on Ultra settings. The system can handle 4K at High settings with an average of 67 FPS, which is playable, but for a consistently smooth 60+ FPS experience, Medium settings (71 FPS) are the recommended choice.

Q: What is the best preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 129 FPS, and the Low preset delivers 170 FPS. To fully utilize a 144Hz display with some headroom, the High preset is the most suitable option, as it stays above the refresh rate threshold while providing better visual quality than Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a clear picture of performance scaling across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally capable. The Low preset achieves an average of 199 FPS, while High and Medium sit close together at 176 FPS and 179 FPS, respectively. The Ultra preset sees a more substantial drop to 131 FPS. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 152 FPS and a maximum of 206 FPS, indicating a wide variance but with a floor well above the refresh rate of most monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings produce an average of 170 FPS, while High and Medium achieve 129 FPS and 135 FPS, respectively. The Ultra preset drops to 83 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution has a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS, suggesting that even the lowest dips remain playable. The performance difference between High and Medium is small (6 FPS), making either a viable choice depending on preference for visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the load on the GPU becomes more apparent. Low settings still manage a strong 94 FPS, but High settings fall to 67 FPS. Medium settings are slightly better at 71 FPS, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding only 43 FPS. This resolution shows a clear tiering: Low is significantly faster, Medium and High are comparable, and Ultra is for those who prioritize image quality over frame rate. The data suggests that 4K gaming at High settings is possible, but for a locked 60 FPS experience, Medium is the safer bet.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a dominant force in this pairing. With 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus and a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s, the GPU has massive headroom for any texture or asset streaming the game might require. The Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process, includes 21,760 shading units and 170 RT cores, though ray tracing is unlikely to be a major factor in an idle game. The core clocks of 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost are high, and the GPU's FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS indicates immense raw compute power.

The benchmark scores for the GPU reflect its top-tier status. It achieves a 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77712. Its nearest rivals are interesting: the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.6% ahead, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants are 2.1% and 2.4% ahead in average score. However, these are workstation or laptop parts with different characteristics. In the measured FPS for Revolution Idle, the GPU's power is evident in the high frame rates at 1440p and 1080p. The fact that the GPU is not the bottleneck is clear when comparing the 1080p Low (199 FPS) and 1440p Low (170 FPS) results, which show a 14.6% drop, indicating that the game's frame rate is scaling with resolution and not being held back by the CPU at these settings. The GPU's role is to ensure that even at 4K, the system remains playable, which it does at Medium settings with an average of 71 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p users, the High preset is the best balance, delivering 176 FPS. This is high enough to saturate any 144Hz or 165Hz display, and the visual improvement over Low (199 FPS) is likely worth the small frame rate cost. The Ultra preset at 131 FPS is also a strong option if the user has a 120Hz or 144Hz monitor and wants maximum visual quality.

For 1440p, the High preset at 129 FPS is the recommended choice for high refresh rate monitors. It provides a smooth experience on 120Hz and 144Hz panels. The Medium preset at 135 FPS is nearly identical in performance, so users can choose based on visual preference. The Ultra preset at 83 FPS is still quite smooth for a 60Hz or 75Hz display, offering a significant visual upgrade over High if the user is willing to sacrifice frame rate.

For 4K, the Medium preset is the clear winner for a balanced experience, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. This ensures a mostly stable 60 FPS experience. The High preset at 67 FPS is close, but the lower minimum (as seen in Medium) suggests Medium is more consistent. The Low preset at 94 FPS is the choice for those who want the highest frame rate on a 4K display, potentially hitting 90+ FPS on a VRR panel. The Ultra preset at 43 FPS is only recommended for users with 30Hz or 60Hz displays who prioritize image quality above all else, as it will not provide a smooth experience on high refresh rate monitors. In summary, the data suggests: 1080p High or Ultra, 1440p High, and 4K Medium for the best frame rate and visual quality trade-off.