Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter emphasizing careful room clearing and squad coordination, places unique demands on a system. The measured data for the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination provides a clear picture of how this hardware handles the game across different resolutions and quality presets. This analysis walks through the FPS figures, the roles of the CPU and GPU, and what settings offer the best experience based on the recorded results.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data shows a predictable but significant drop as resolution increases, which is the primary indicator of the GPU's workload. At 1080p with High settings, the combo produces an average of 294 FPS. Moving to 1440p reduces this to 184.2 FPS, a decrease of about 37%. At 4K, the average drops further to 95.3 FPS, which is roughly half of the 1440p figure and about one-third of the 1080p number. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a system where the graphics card is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The gap between presets also widens with resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 161.4 FPS (366 vs 204.6). At 1440p, that difference narrows to 99.6 FPS (231.5 vs 131.9). At 4K, the spread is 52.9 FPS (120.9 vs 68). This trend confirms that the GPU is being saturated as pixel count increases. The RTX 4070, with its 12 GB of memory and 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, is managing the load, but the data indicates that the highest settings at 4K push the hardware to its limits, resulting in a 68 FPS average at Ultra.

The 1080p results, particularly the 366 FPS average at Low settings, suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding frames well beyond what most displays can show. The i7-14700F’s 20 cores and 28 threads are not the bottleneck at this resolution. However, the 4K Ultra result of 68 FPS shows a hard ceiling for this GPU in this title. The data suggests that for a consistently smooth experience at 4K, users should consider the Medium or High presets, as they offer a more comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process. Its specifications include 5888 shading units, 46 RT cores, and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. In this game, the GPU's role is dominant, as evidenced by the resolution scaling. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for the textures and assets in Ready Or Not, as the frame rates remain playable even at 4K on High settings, hitting 95.3 FPS.

The benchmark data for the GPU shows an average score of 37283, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, has an average score of 37507, which is a deltaPct of -0.6. This means the RTX 4070 is essentially on par with that older card in synthetic benchmarks, though its real-world performance in this specific game is what matters. The data shows that the GPU's performance in Ready Or Not is strong, but the Ultra preset at 4K creates a significant demand that the card cannot fully meet, resulting in the 68 FPS average.

Looking at the measured frames, the GPU's capability is best utilized at 1440p. Here, the High preset delivers 184.2 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most standard monitors. The Ultra preset at 1440p still yields a very respectable 131.9 FPS. This suggests that for the best balance of visual quality and performance, the RTX 4070 is well-suited for 1440p gaming in this title. The 4K results are usable, but the data implies that the GPU is the primary constraint, especially when comparing the 120.9 FPS at Low to the 68 FPS at Ultra.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Raptor Lake Refresh family, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its synthetic benchmark scores are high, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35443 and a single-core score of 5003. This processing power ensures that the CPU is not a bottleneck in Ready Or Not, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has headroom. The 1080p Low result of 366 FPS confirms the CPU's ability to process game logic and draw calls rapidly.

The CPU's performance relative to its peers is solid. It holds a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54097. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, scores 54450, a deltaPct of -0.6, indicating near-identical performance. This means the i7-14700F is competitive with top-tier processors. In the context of this game, the CPU's high single-thread performance is crucial for maintaining high frame rates, as tactical shooters often have significant physics and AI calculations.

The data suggests that the CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU is working harder to keep up with the GPU, resulting in extremely high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU has more idle capacity. The 68 FPS at 4K Ultra is not due to CPU limitations but rather the GPU's inability to render the frame fast enough. Therefore, while the CPU is a strong component, the overall system performance in this game is dictated by the GPU’s capabilities.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on which preset offers the best experience. For 1080p users, even the Ultra preset delivers an average of 204.6 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. There is little reason to compromise on quality at this resolution, as the hardware is more than capable. The Low preset at 366 FPS is overkill for most displays, so the visual benefits of High or Ultra are preferable.

For 1440p, the High preset at 184.2 FPS is the sweet spot. It provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (203 FPS) and Low (231.5 FPS) while maintaining a frame rate that is far above the 60 FPS standard. The Ultra preset at 131.9 FPS is also viable for those with high-refresh-rate monitors, as it still provides a smooth experience. The data indicates that the difference between Medium and High is worth the small performance cost.

At 4K, the choices are more constrained. The Ultra preset’s 68 FPS average is playable but may result in occasional dips in demanding scenes. The High preset at 95.3 FPS is a better choice for a locked 60 FPS experience with higher visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 104.1 FPS offers a slight performance boost over High, but the visual difference may not be justified. The Low preset at 120.9 FPS is the highest performing option, but it sacrifices too much visual quality for a game that relies on atmosphere and visibility. For most users at 4K, the High preset provides the best balance, leveraging the GPU’s strengths without pushing it to its breaking point.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 366 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37283, while the RX Vega 56 scores 37507. This gives the RTX 4070 a deltaPct of -0.6, meaning it is slightly less powerful in these tests.

Q: What is the performance difference between the i7-14700F and the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X?

A: The i7-14700F has an average score of 54097, and the Ryzen 9 9900X has an average score of 54450. The deltaPct is -0.6, indicating the Intel chip is marginally slower in overall synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 68, while the CPU’s performance is sufficient to drive much higher frame rates at lower resolutions.

Q: What is the recommended preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: The High preset is recommended for 1440p, as it delivers an average of 184.2 FPS, offering a strong balance between visual quality and performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070?

A: The RTX 4070 has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, supported by 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table presents the exact average FPS measurements for each resolution and settings combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 68 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 95.3 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 104.1 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 120.9 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 131.9 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 184.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 203 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 231.5 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 204.6 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 294 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 319.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 366 |

These figures show a clear hierarchy. The 1080p results are all exceptionally high, making the game playable on any preset. The 1440p results remain strong, with even the Ultra preset exceeding 130 FPS. The 4K results are the most demanding, with only the Low preset exceeding 120 FPS and the Ultra preset falling to 68 FPS. This data allows users to make an informed decision based on their display's resolution and refresh rate.