Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
182
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 182 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 64 90 100 114
1440p QHD 122 173 190 218
1080p Full HD 193 274 302 346

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 114
3840x2160 Medium 100
3840x2160 High 90
3840x2160 Ultra 64
2560x1440 Low 218
2560x1440 Medium 190
2560x1440 High 173
2560x1440 Ultra 122
1920x1080 Low 346
1920x1080 Medium 302
1920x1080 High 274
1920x1080 Ultra 193

Ready Or Not with Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a formidable 1080p and 1440p experience in Ready Or Not, with the data showing a clear shift towards GPU limitation at higher resolutions. The CPU provides a solid foundation with 6 cores and 12 threads, running at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, while the GPU brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a substantial 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth to handle the game's demanding tactical environments.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture. Its performance profile, as seen in the benchmark data, shows strong multi-threaded capabilities with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and a single-core score of 1680. This indicates a balanced processor that can handle the AI-driven scenarios and complex physics calculations typical of a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not, where multiple enemies and interactive objects must be tracked simultaneously.

In the context of the measured FPS results, the CPU's role becomes evident when examining the frame rates at lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 346 FPS, and at 1080p High, it still manages 274 FPS. These high frame rates suggest that the processor is not a bottleneck at this resolution, providing enough headroom for the GPU to render frames quickly. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 and the max-thread score of 5912 reinforce that the CPU can sustain high throughput across all its cores, which is essential for maintaining consistent frame pacing in chaotic firefights.

The processor's 18 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant asset for gaming, as it allows for faster access to frequently used data. When combined with the dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, the CPU can feed data to the GPU efficiently. The benchmark results show the i5-12400F sits in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19039. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, has a nearly identical average score of 19047, showing a delta of 0%, which places this Intel chip in highly competitive company for mid-range gaming performance.

Looking at the frame rate progression from 1080p to 1440p, the CPU's influence wanes as the resolution increases. At 1440p High, the average FPS drops to 173, and at 4K High, it falls further to 90. This scaling pattern indicates that while the CPU provides sufficient power for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the GPU becomes the primary limiter as pixel count rises. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3481, ensures that the game's main thread can process commands quickly, but the sheer volume of pixels at 4K overwhelms the GPU's rendering capacity.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in this pairing, featuring the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus and a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, this GPU has ample resources for Ready Or Not's detailed environments and high-resolution textures. The boost clock of 2520 MHz and game clock of 2070 MHz drive a peak FP32 performance of 36.13 TFLOPS, which translates directly into the high frame rates observed in the measured data.

The GPU's memory capacity is particularly relevant for this game, as tactical shooters often feature large, open maps with many destructible elements. The 16 GB VRAM ensures that texture streaming and geometry loads do not cause stutters, even at Ultra settings. The data supports this: at 4K Ultra, the combo still averages 64 FPS, which is playable but shows the stress of maximum settings on the rendering pipeline. The GPU's 128 ROPs and 3584 shading units work in tandem to fill pixels and apply lighting effects, which are critical for the dark, tense atmosphere of Ready Or Not.

The RX 9070's benchmark scores place it in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 23877. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, scores 23736, a delta of 0.6%, indicating that the RX 9070 offers slightly better raw performance. However, the more relevant comparison for modern gaming is against the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, which scores 24063, putting the RX 9070 0.8% behind. This narrow margin suggests that the RX 9070 is a well-optimized card for its class, delivering consistent performance across various workloads.

The GPU's role becomes clearer when analyzing the FPS drops across settings at the same resolution. At 1440p, the average FPS goes from 218 on Low to 122 on Ultra, a reduction of 96 FPS. This steep decline highlights that the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling with graphical fidelity. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and Passmark G3D score of 25381 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance, which is the API used by modern titles like Ready Or Not. The card's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate ensures compatibility with advanced features like ray tracing and mesh shaders, though the measured data does not specify if these are enabled in the test scenarios.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Analyzing the measured FPS rows, the Medium preset emerges as the optimal balance between visual quality and performance stability. At 1440p Medium, the combo achieves an average of 190 FPS, with a minimum of 162 FPS and a maximum of 219 FPS. This frame range provides a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate monitors without the significant performance hit seen at Ultra. The minimum FPS of 162 is well above the 144 Hz threshold, ensuring that even in intense firefights with multiple enemies and environmental destruction, the frame rate remains fluid.

At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers an average of 302 FPS, with a minimum of 256 FPS and maximum of 347 FPS. This is an exceptional result for competitive play, as the high minimum frame rate prevents any perceptible hitches. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p only costs 44 FPS on average (from 346 to 302), which is a reasonable trade-off for the visual improvements in lighting and texture detail. In contrast, moving from Medium to Ultra at 1080p results in a massive drop to 193 FPS, a 109 FPS reduction that does not justify the marginal visual gains in a fast-paced tactical shooter.

For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is also the safest choice, with an average of 100 FPS and a minimum of 85 FPS. While the High preset at 4K achieves 90 FPS average, the Medium preset provides a higher minimum frame rate, which is crucial for maintaining playability during sudden action sequences. The Low preset at 4K offers 114 FPS, but the visual fidelity is likely too compromised for a game that relies heavily on environmental cues and enemy visibility. The Ultra preset at 4K, with its 64 FPS average, is not recommended as it falls below the 70 FPS threshold that many players consider acceptable for smooth gameplay.

The data shows that the Medium preset offers the best "experience per measured row" because it consistently provides high average FPS with a documented minimum FPS that indicates stability. The Ultra preset, while visually impressive, sacrifices too much performance across all resolutions, with the 4K Ultra result of 64 FPS being particularly problematic. The High preset is a viable alternative for those prioritizing visuals, but the Medium preset's combination of high averages and stable minimums makes it the standout choice.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific configuration of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 ranks 1127 out of 3714 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the top 30% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank of 1127 indicates that while this combo is not at the absolute top tier of performance, it significantly outperforms the majority of systems in the database, likely due to the RX 9070's robust 4K capabilities.

The ranking position is particularly notable given the CPU's relatively modest specifications compared to higher-end processors. The i5-12400F's 73rd percentile among CPUs suggests that many other processors in the database offer more raw compute power, but the RX 9070's 69th percentile among GPUs is the driving force behind this combo's overall rank. The GPU's ability to maintain high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, as shown in the measured FPS data, compensates for any CPU limitations, resulting in a rank that reflects strong gaming performance rather than pure synthetic benchmark scores.

When compared to other combos in the database, the 1127 rank out of 3714 means that there are 1126 combinations that perform better, but 2587 that perform worse. This puts the combo in a solid position for gaming, especially considering that Ready Or Not is a demanding title that requires both CPU and GPU resources. The data shows that the combo can handle the game at playable frame rates up to 4K Medium, which is more than sufficient for most users. The rank also suggests that users with this hardware can expect consistent performance without needing to upgrade either component for this specific game.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases, which provides insight into which component is the bottleneck. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 274 at 1080p to 173 at 1440p, and then to 90 at 4K. This represents a 37% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 48% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The proportionally larger drop from 1440p to 4K indicates that the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated as pixel count quadruples.

The Low settings data shows a similar trend: 346 FPS at 1080p, 218 FPS at 1440p, and 114 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K here is 104 FPS, or 48%, which mirrors the High settings percentage. This consistency across settings suggests that the GPU's rendering pipeline is the limiting factor, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with resolution. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a plateau in FPS at lower resolutions, but the data shows continuous scaling even at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is always working near its capacity.

The Medium settings data, which includes minimum FPS values, further confirms this analysis. At 1080p Medium, the average is 302 FPS with a minimum of 256 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 190 FPS with a minimum of 162 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 FPS. The minimum FPS values scale proportionally with the averages, which is a sign of consistent GPU-bound performance. The i5-12400F's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 909, is sufficient to feed the GPU at all resolutions, but it cannot overcome the GPU's rendering limits at higher pixel counts.

The implication of this scaling pattern is that the RX 9070 is the primary limiter in this combo, particularly at 4K. The CPU has the headroom to push higher frame rates, but the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are taxed heavily by the game's high-resolution assets. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p, this combo is well-balanced, but at 4K, the GPU's performance ceiling is the defining factor. The data suggests that lowering settings at 4K provides a more effective FPS boost than upgrading the CPU, as the RX 9070's compute units are the bottleneck.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Ready Or Not with this CPU and GPU combo?*

A: The measured data shows that 1440p Medium provides an excellent balance with an average FPS of 190 and a minimum of 162, ensuring smooth gameplay. While 1080p offers higher frame rates (up to 346 FPS on Low), 1440p leverages the RX 9070's capabilities better for visual clarity without sacrificing performance.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-12400F bottleneck the AMD Radeon RX 9070 in this game?

A: Based on the FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K, the CPU does not appear to be a bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 346 FPS, and the frame rate drops consistently as resolution increases, indicating that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU's 12 threads and 18 MB of L3 cache are sufficient to keep up with the GPU's demands.

Q: How does the RX 9070 perform against its nearest rival, the RX 6800S, in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23877, which is 0.8% lower than the RX 6800S's score of 24063. This indicates that the RX 9070 is slightly behind in raw compute tests, but the measured FPS data in Ready Or Not shows strong real-world performance, suggesting the game may be optimized for the RDNA 4.0 architecture.

Q: Is the Ultra preset viable for 4K gaming with this combo?

A: The data shows that 4K Ultra yields an average of 64 FPS, which is playable but below the 70 FPS threshold many consider optimal for smooth action. The Medium preset at 4K provides a more stable experience with 100 FPS average and 85 FPS minimum, making it the recommended choice for 4K.

Q: What is the expected frame rate difference between Low and High settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset achieves an average of 346 FPS, while the High preset achieves 274 FPS. This is a difference of 72 FPS, or about 21%, which shows that the GPU can handle higher settings at this resolution with minimal performance impact.

Q: How does this combo's rank of 1127 out of 3714 compare to other tested systems?

A: The rank of 1127 places this combo in the top 30% of all tested combinations, indicating that it performs better than 2587 other combos in the database. This is a strong result, particularly for a mid-range CPU like the i5-12400F, which has a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 114.0
3840x2160 Medium 100.0
3840x2160 High 90.0
3840x2160 Ultra 64.0
2560x1440 Low 218.0
2560x1440 Medium 190.0
2560x1440 High 173.0
2560x1440 Ultra 122.0
1920x1080 Low 346.0
1920x1080 Medium 302.0
1920x1080 High 274.0
1920x1080 Ultra 193.0

Ready Or Not with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with RX 9070 + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400F + RX 9070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.