Ready Or Not

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with the Intel Arc B370 presents a highly constrained platform for Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter that demands consistent frame rates for precise aiming and situational awareness. The benchmark data is unequivocal: this combination ranks 2710th out of 2947 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of all systems. This is a pairing where the integrated graphics processor (IGP) is the definitive bottleneck, and the CPU's capabilities are largely left untapped. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, settings viability, and the specific roles each component plays in this demanding title.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.60 GHz. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU demonstrates robust multi-threaded performance, scoring 12,830.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1,494 in single-core. Its average benchmark score of 27,051 places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K, scoring 27,097, a negligible delta of -0.2%. This indicates the 5700G is a very capable processor for gaming workloads, providing ample headroom for physics, AI, and game logic in a title like Ready Or Not.

However, the data shows that the CPU's potential is not the limiting factor in this specific configuration. The measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings are directly tied to the GPU's output, not the CPU's processing power. For instance, at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 113 FPS. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see frame rates plateau at a certain level regardless of resolution. Instead, we see a clear decline as resolution increases: 113 FPS at 1080p Low, 71 FPS at 1440p Low, and 37 FPS at 4K Low. This pattern is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario, where the integrated graphics are struggling to keep up with the increasing pixel count.

The CPU's 16 MB of L3 cache and 16 threads ensure that it won't stutter or cause frame-time hitches in complex tactical situations. The 3dmark scores support this, with a 16-thread score of 6,629 and a single-thread score of 899, showing a balanced profile that can handle both heavily threaded background tasks and the primary game thread. In essence, the Ryzen 7 5700G is a strong foundation, but in this configuration, it is like a high-performance engine connected to a severely restricted drivetrain. The game's performance ceiling is set by the Intel Arc B370, not the CPU.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Given the limited performance envelope, the choice of settings is critical for achieving a playable experience. The data provides a clear hierarchy at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 113 FPS, making it the only setting that comfortably exceeds the 100 FPS threshold for high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset drops to 98 FPS, which is still smooth but represents an 15 FPS penalty. High settings produce 89 FPS, and Ultra falls to 63 FPS. For 1080p, the Low preset is objectively the best for competitive play, offering the highest frame rate and lowest latency. However, the Medium preset at 98 FPS is a viable alternative if visual fidelity is prioritized, as it remains above the 60 FPS standard.

At 2560x1440, the performance curve shifts downward significantly. The Low preset is the only one that maintains a playable average, hitting 71 FPS. Medium drops to 62 FPS, which is borderline for a fast-paced tactical shooter, and High falls to 56 FPS. Ultra is not recommended, as it produces an average of 40 FPS, which is likely to feel sluggish and unresponsive. For 1440p, the Low preset is the only sensible choice for a consistent experience.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the data shows that this combo is not viable for smooth gameplay. The Low preset averages just 37 FPS, Medium drops to 32 FPS, and High is at 29 FPS. Ultra is a slideshow at 21 FPS. None of these are acceptable for a game where split-second reactions are paramount. The recommendation is clear: users should play at 1080p with the Low preset to maximize the chance of a positive experience. If a higher resolution is required, the Low preset at 1440p is the absolute maximum this hardware can handle, and even then, the 71 FPS average is far from ideal.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this hardware in Ready Or Not?*

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 with the Low preset, yielding an average of 113 FPS, is the best combination. It provides the highest frame rate and is the only configuration that breaks the 100 FPS mark.

*Q: Is this system capable of running Ready Or Not at 4K resolution?*

A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only averages 37 FPS. The Ultra preset averages just 21 FPS. All 4K results are below the 60 FPS threshold required for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to the Low preset in terms of performance?

A: The performance cost is substantial. At 1080p, the Ultra preset averages 63 FPS, which is 50 FPS lower than the Low preset's 113 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra averages 40 FPS compared to Low's 71 FPS, a 31 FPS difference.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the main performance bottleneck in this system?

A: The benchmark data indicates the GPU is the bottleneck. Frame rates scale inversely with resolution (e.g., 113 FPS at 1080p Low vs. 37 FPS at 4K Low), which is a clear sign that the integrated graphics processor is struggling with the rendering workload.

Q: What is the average frame rate at 2560x1440 on Medium settings?

A: The measured average frame rate is 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. This is playable but is close to the lower bounds of smooth performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700G a weak processor?

A: No. The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,051, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. It outperforms the Intel Core i7-1370P by 0.6% in average score. Its performance is more than sufficient, but it is being held back by the Intel Arc B370's limited graphics capabilities.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The data is unambiguous about this system's standing: it ranks 2710th out of 2947 tested combinations for Ready Or Not. This places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations, a stark indicator of its performance limitations. This ranking is not a reflection of the CPU's capabilities, but rather a direct consequence of the GPU's low performance percentile of 5. The Intel Arc B370's average benchmark score is a mere 1,184, which is 0.2% lower than the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and 0.5% lower than the ATI Radeon HD 5770, both of which are significantly older parts.

This low rank means that the vast majority of other tested systems will deliver a superior gaming experience. While the Ryzen 7 5700G is a top-quartile processor, it is paired with a bottom-quartile graphics solution. The result is a system that is fundamentally unbalanced for a graphics-intensive title like Ready Or Not. The combination's ranking is a critical metric for any potential user, as it accurately predicts that the system will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at mainstream settings. The data suggests that this combo is only suitable for the most undemanding scenarios or for users who prioritize other aspects of the system over gaming performance.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and built on Intel's 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Its memory is "System Shared," meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the system's main memory, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." This is a significant limitation for a game like Ready Or Not, which features complex environments and textures. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units, resulting in a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS.

The GPU's performance percentile of 5 is the core issue. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,184 is nearly identical to that of the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1,190), a card from over a decade ago. This places the Arc B370 in a performance class that is fundamentally unsuited for modern gaming at high resolutions. The data confirms this: the highest average frame rate achieved is 113 FPS at 1080p Low, and it quickly degrades to 71 FPS at 1440p Low and 37 FPS at 4K Low. The reliance on system memory for VRAM, combined with its low raw compute power, results in a severe bandwidth and processing bottleneck.

The boost clock of 2400 MHz is high, but it cannot compensate for the limited number of execution units. The GPU is forced to render at lower resolutions and settings to stay within its performance envelope. The system's "System Shared" memory is a further handicap, as it shares bandwidth with the CPU, potentially creating contention that impacts frame times. The data shows that this GPU is simply not equipped to handle the demands of Ready Or Not beyond the most minimal settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following is a complete breakdown of the measured average frame rates (with min/max where available) for this configuration in Ready Or Not.

At 1920x1080:

• Low: 113 FPS average. This is the highest performance point for this system.
• Medium: 98 FPS average, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS.
• High: 89 FPS average. A playable option, but with diminishing returns.
• Ultra: 63 FPS average. The lowest performance at this resolution, dipping below the 60 FPS line for demanding scenes.

At 2560x1440:

• Low: 71 FPS average. This is the only preset at 1440p that approaches a smooth experience.
• Medium: 62 FPS average, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. This is on the edge of the playable threshold.
• High: 56 FPS average. Performance begins to suffer significantly.
• Ultra: 40 FPS average. This is not recommended for a playable experience.

At 3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 37 FPS average. This is not a playable frame rate for a tactical shooter.
• Medium: 32 FPS average, with a minimum of 28 FPS and a maximum of 37 FPS.
• High: 29 FPS average. The experience is severely compromised.
• Ultra: 21 FPS average. This is effectively a slideshow.

The data shows a clear linear degradation in performance as resolution increases, and a significant penalty for moving from Low to Ultra settings. The only configuration that delivers a consistently smooth experience is 1080p with Low settings. The 1080p Medium preset is a viable compromise, but the 1440p and 4K results are all sub-optimal.