Ready Or Not

# Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 produces a widely varying performance envelope in Ready Or Not, depending almost entirely on resolution and quality preset. At 1080p, this combo delivers triple-digit frame rates across all settings, but the climb to 4K reveals a steep drop-off that exposes the GPU as the primary constraint. The measured data shows a system that can handle competitive play at 1080p, remains comfortable at 1440p on higher presets, but struggles to maintain smooth performance at 4K Ultra.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate degradation from 1080p to 4K is severe and consistent across all settings, pointing to a GPU-bound workload at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 205 at 1920x1080 to 129 at 2560x1440, a 37% reduction, and then further down to 67 at 3840x2160, which is 67% below the 1080p figure. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a 48% loss, indicating that the RTX 2060’s memory bandwidth and shading resources are increasingly overwhelmed as pixel count rises.

Medium settings follow a similar trajectory: 178 FPS at 1080p, 113 at 1440p, and 59 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 37%, and from 1440p to 4K is 48%. High settings show 162 FPS at 1080p, 102 at 1440p, and 54 at 4K, with percentage losses of 37% and 47% respectively. Ultra settings are the most punishing: 114 FPS at 1080p, 72 at 1440p, and 38 at 4K, representing a 37% loss from 1080p to 1440p and a 47% loss from 1440p to 4K.

The consistency of these percentage drops—roughly 37% from 1080p to 1440p and 47-48% from 1440p to 4K—across all settings is notable. This uniform scaling pattern indicates that the limiting factor is not CPU-side logic or draw-call overhead, but rather the GPU’s raw pixel throughput. The RTX 2060’s 192-bit memory bus and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth become the bottleneck as resolution increases, since the pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s is fixed hardware capability that must be spread across more pixels.

At 1080p, the data suggests the CPU is more involved in determining performance. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads, boosting to 4.70 GHz, are sufficient to feed the GPU, as evidenced by the 205 FPS Low result. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p (205 vs 114 FPS, a 44% difference) shows that GPU load still matters, but the absolute headroom indicates the CPU is not the primary limiter at this resolution. The 4K results, where even Low settings only produce 67 FPS, demonstrate that the GPU is decisively the bottleneck.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the dominant performance driver in this configuration, and its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory is a critical factor. At 4K Ultra, the combo manages only 38 FPS average, which is below the 50 FPS minimum recorded at 4K Medium. The memory bus width of 192 bit and bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s are modest by modern standards, and the 6 GB capacity can be a limiting factor in a tactical shooter that renders detailed environments.

The GPU’s clock speeds—1365 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost—are relatively low, and the measured results reflect this. The FP32 compute of 6.451 TFLOPS is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K Ultra result of 38 FPS indicates that the shading units (1920) and texture units (120) are simply outmatched when rendering at 3840x2160 with maximum detail. The texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s are fixed ceilings that the game’s visual load at 4K Ultra clearly exceeds.

The RTX 2060’s position in the broader GPU landscape is modest, sitting at the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0% delta), AMD Radeon 680M (0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (0.6% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.8% delta). This tight clustering around a 15290 average benchmark score indicates that the RTX 2060 is in a performance tier that can handle mainstream gaming but lacks the headroom for high-resolution, high-detail workloads.

The 4K Medium result of 59 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS shows that the GPU can produce playable frame rates if settings are moderated. However, the jump from Medium to Ultra at 4K (59 to 38 FPS, a 36% drop) is substantial, suggesting that Ultra settings introduce effects that disproportionately tax the GPU—likely the RT cores (30) and tensor cores (240) being engaged for real-time ray tracing or AI-enhanced features. The 6 GB VRAM capacity may also cause texture streaming issues at 4K Ultra, though the measured data does not include VRAM utilization figures.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data supports a clear recommendation: at 1080p, all settings are viable, but Medium provides the best balance of frame rate and visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 1080p delivers 178 FPS average with a minimum of 152 FPS and a maximum of 205 FPS. This is 16 FPS below the Low preset (205 FPS) but 64 FPS above Ultra (114 FPS), showing that Medium captures most of the performance headroom while offering significantly better visuals than Low.

At 1440p, High settings are the sweet spot. The High preset at 2560x1440 produces 102 FPS average, which is 11 FPS below Medium (113 FPS) but 30 FPS above Ultra (72 FPS). The 102 FPS figure is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and the margin over Medium is small enough that the visual upgrade is worth the performance cost. Low at 1440p (129 FPS) is unnecessary unless chasing maximum frame rates on a high-refresh monitor.

At 4K, the recommendation is more constrained. Medium settings at 3840x2160 yield 59 FPS average with a minimum of 50 FPS, which is borderline for smooth play. Low settings at 4K produce 67 FPS, which is more comfortable but sacrifices visual quality. High at 4K (54 FPS) and Ultra at 4K (38 FPS) are below the 60 FPS target and should be avoided for serious play. Players with a 4K display should accept Medium or Low presets, depending on whether visual fidelity or frame rate stability is prioritized.

The Ultra preset is uniformly the worst choice across all resolutions. At 1080p, it drops to 114 FPS (36% below Medium); at 1440p, it falls to 72 FPS (36% below Medium); at 4K, it collapses to 38 FPS (36% below Medium). The consistent 36% penalty for Ultra over Medium suggests that this preset enables computationally expensive features that do not scale well with the RTX 2060’s hardware, and the performance cost outweighs the visual benefit in a fast-paced tactical shooter where frame rate matters.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 2060 and Ryzen 5 7400F combination delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 205 FPS, with no recorded minimum or maximum. Medium settings average 178 FPS, with a minimum of 152 FPS and a maximum of 205 FPS—the maximum matching the Low average, indicating that the CPU is not capping performance in this range. High settings average 162 FPS, and Ultra settings average 114 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 91 FPS, showing that settings have a major impact even at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops are significant but the system remains capable. Low settings average 129 FPS, Medium averages 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS and maximum of 129 FPS, High averages 102 FPS, and Ultra averages 72 FPS. The Medium preset’s maximum of 129 FPS matches the Low average, again suggesting a ceiling that may be influenced by CPU or other system limits. The minimum of 96 FPS at Medium is still above 60 FPS, indicating no severe frame time spikes at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the results fall below the 60 FPS threshold for most presets. Low settings average 67 FPS, Medium averages 59 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS and maximum of 68 FPS, High averages 54 FPS, and Ultra averages 38 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 50 FPS and maximum of 68 FPS shows a 18 FPS spread, which is wider than at lower resolutions and suggests inconsistent frame pacing under load. The Ultra preset’s 38 FPS average is the only result below 40 FPS in the entire dataset.

How This Combo Ranks

In Ready Or Not, this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2322 out of 2947 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 21% of all configurations. This low ranking is primarily attributable to the GPU’s performance tier, as the RTX 2060 sits at the 58th percentile of all GPUs but is paired with a CPU that ranks at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The mismatch between the CPU’s relative strength and the GPU’s relative weakness means this combo is CPU-limited at lower resolutions but GPU-limited at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s benchmark scores support this interpretation. The Ryzen 5 7400F achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072, placing it in the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% delta), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (-0.2% delta), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (0.3% delta). These rivals all have similar average benchmark scores around 32700, indicating that the CPU is competitive with mid-range to upper-mid-range processors.

The GPU, by contrast, is near the bottom of its own performance tier. The RTX 2060’s average benchmark score of 15290 is nearly identical to the GTX 580 (15283), which is a GPU from a much older generation. The 0% delta between these two cards is striking, showing that the RTX 2060’s modern features (RT cores, tensor cores, DirectX 12 Ultimate support) do not translate into higher raw benchmark scores. The combo’s rank of 2322 out of 2947 reflects this: it is a mid-range CPU paired with a GPU that performs like a much older card in synthetic benchmarks, and the in-game results mirror this.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Ready Or Not?

A: The measured data shows 1080p is the only resolution where all settings exceed 100 FPS average, with Low achieving 205 FPS, Medium 178 FPS, High 162 FPS, and Ultra 114 FPS. 1440p is also viable, with all presets except Ultra staying above 100 FPS, but 4K results drop below 70 FPS on all settings.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Ready Or Not?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K, only Low settings (67 FPS) and Medium settings (59 FPS) approach playable frame rates. High settings drop to 54 FPS and Ultra to 38 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 50 FPS suggests occasional dips below comfortable levels.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: In average benchmark score, the RTX 2060 (15290) is virtually identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15283), with a 0% delta. It also sits close to the AMD Radeon 680M (15270, 0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199, 0.6% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171, 0.8% delta).

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F the bottleneck at any resolution?

A: The data suggests the CPU is not the primary limiter at any resolution. At 1080p, the Medium preset’s maximum FPS (205) matches the Low average (205), which could indicate a CPU cap, but the more likely explanation is that the GPU is still the constraint. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking is well above the GPU’s 58th percentile.

Q: What is the performance difference between Medium and Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p, Medium averages 178 FPS versus Ultra’s 114 FPS, a 36% difference. At 1440p, Medium averages 113 FPS versus Ultra’s 72 FPS, also a 36% difference. At 4K, Medium averages 59 FPS versus Ultra’s 38 FPS, again a 36% difference. The consistent 36% penalty suggests Ultra enables features that cost a fixed fraction of performance.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 2322 out of 2947 tested combos in Ready Or Not, placing it in the bottom 21% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the GPU’s modest performance tier rather than the CPU, which ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F plays a supporting role in this configuration, and the measured FPS data indicates that it is rarely the limiting factor. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture, provide sufficient processing power for Ready Or Not’s game logic and AI systems. The base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz are competitive, and the 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The CPU’s benchmark performance reinforces this assessment. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 place the Ryzen 5 7400F in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, which is well above the GPU’s 58th percentile. The PassMark multithread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 further confirm that the CPU has ample headroom for gaming workloads. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, supported by dual-channel DDR5, ensures that the CPU can feed data to the GPU without creating a bottleneck.

At 1080p Low, the 205 FPS average is the highest result in the entire dataset, and the fact that the Medium preset’s maximum FPS also hits 205 suggests the CPU can sustain this frame rate. However, the GPU’s inability to exceed 205 FPS even at Low settings indicates that the RTX 2060’s rendering pipeline reaches its limit at this point. The CPU’s role becomes even less significant at higher resolutions, where the GPU’s pixel throughput is the clear constraint.

The Ryzen 5 7400F’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score—Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% delta), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (-0.2% delta), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (0.3% delta)—all have similar scores around 32700. This tight clustering shows that the CPU is performing as expected for its tier, and the 83rd percentile ranking confirms it is a solid mid-range processor. In Ready Or Not, the CPU’s contribution is to ensure consistent frame delivery without drops, which the data supports: even at 4K Medium, the minimum FPS of 50 shows no signs of CPU-induced stutter.