Pc Building Simulator

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a top-tier experience in Pc Building Simulator, ranking 405th out of 3002 tested combos. This places the combination in the top 13.5% of all recorded systems, a strong showing for a simulation title that often favors balanced hardware over extreme single-component performance. The measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings confirm that this pairing is more than capable of handling the game’s demands, with the CPU’s 24 cores and the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM working in concert to produce smooth, high-refresh gameplay. The data indicates that users can expect excellent performance at 1440p and even 4K, though the optimal settings depend on the target display’s refresh rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 405 out of 3002 tested combinations places this system firmly in the upper echelon of tested hardware pairings. This percentile position reflects the synergy between the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and the RTX 4070 SUPER, where neither component bottlenecks the other in this simulation workload. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 84003 places it in the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s average score of 43223 sits in the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards. When combined, these scores translate into a system that excels in Pc Building Simulator, a game that relies heavily on consistent frame pacing rather than raw peak performance.

The CPU’s nearest rivals provide context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K scores 83807, a mere 0.2% behind the 290K Plus, indicating that the newer chip offers only a marginal improvement in synthetic benchmarks. The AMD EPYC 4584PX and EPYC 9135 trail by 1.1% and 1.2% respectively, with scores of 83090 and 82980. On the other side, the AMD EPYC 7F72 leads by 1.3% with a score of 85072. These tight margins suggest that in Pc Building Simulator, the CPU choice among these high-end parts will have minimal impact on actual gameplay, as the game’s simulation logic is not heavily threaded to exploit all 24 cores.

For the GPU, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, 0.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, 0.1% behind), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301, 0.2% behind). The RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 1% with a score of 43667. This clustering indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER’s performance is well understood, and its 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs reflects its position as a high-midrange card that punches above its weight in this specific title.

Given the measured FPS data, the combo’s rank of 405 is justified. At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 195 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz threshold for most gaming monitors. At 1440p Ultra, the average drops to 123 FPS, still smooth for high-refresh displays. Even at 4K Ultra, the 64 FPS average is playable, though users targeting 60 FPS or higher will want to consider the High preset which delivers 67 FPS. The ranking reflects this versatility: the combo is not the absolute fastest, but it offers a balanced experience across all resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data across resolutions and settings provides clear guidance for optimal gameplay. For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset at 195 FPS is the best choice for users with high-refresh monitors (144 Hz or higher), as it delivers maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 205 FPS offers a marginal 10 FPS improvement, but the visual difference between High and Ultra in a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator is often negligible, making Ultra the preferred option. The Medium preset at 290 FPS is excessive for most displays, and the Low preset at 409 FPS is only relevant for competitive play, which is not a typical use case for this genre.

For 1440p, the Ultra preset at 123 FPS is ideal for 120 Hz or 144 Hz monitors, providing a near-perfect balance of image quality and performance. The High preset at 129 FPS is nearly identical in performance, so users should default to Ultra for the best visuals. The Medium preset at 183 FPS is overkill for most 1440p displays, which typically max out at 144 Hz or 165 Hz, but it does offer headroom for users with higher refresh rates like 240 Hz. The Low preset at 258 FPS is unnecessary unless the user prioritizes frame rate above all else, which contradicts the simulation genre’s focus on detail and realism.

At 4K, the situation changes. The Ultra preset at 64 FPS is playable but not ideal for smooth motion, especially on displays with variable refresh rates. The High preset at 67 FPS is only a 3 FPS improvement, so the recommended setting for 4K is Medium, which delivers 96 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. This provides a much smoother experience than Ultra or High, and the visual difference between Medium and High in Pc Building Simulator is less pronounced than in fast-paced shooters. The Low preset at 135 FPS is an option for users who want to push beyond 120 FPS at 4K, but it sacrifices too much visual detail for a simulation game where users are often inspecting components closely.

The data supports a tiered recommendation: for 1080p and 1440p, use Ultra; for 4K, use Medium unless the user has a 60 Hz display, in which case High at 67 FPS is acceptable. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS values (81 at 4K, 155 at 1440p, 246 at 1080p) indicate consistent frame delivery, avoiding the stutters that can occur with less capable hardware.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this CPU and GPU in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows that 1440p Ultra at 123 FPS is the sweet spot for high-refresh displays, while 4K Medium at 96 FPS (min 81, max 110) is optimal for UHD monitors. For 1080p, Ultra at 195 FPS provides the best visual quality without performance concerns.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The 290K Plus has an average benchmark score of 84003, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (83807), 1.1% higher than the AMD EPYC 4584PX (83090), and 1.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 9135 (82980). It trails the AMD EPYC 7F72 by 1.3% (85072).

Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER sufficient for 4K gaming in this title?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Medium, the GPU delivers 96 FPS average with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. At 4K High, it drops to 67 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 64 FPS. For consistent 60+ FPS, Medium is the recommended setting.

Q: What is the VRAM usage implication for this game?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. Pc Building Simulator’s measured FPS at 4K Ultra (64 FPS) suggests the game does not exceed this VRAM capacity, as the performance drop from Medium to Ultra is modest (96 to 64 FPS) rather than a catastrophic failure.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 405th out of 3002 tested combos, placing it in the top 13.5% of all systems. This rank is supported by the CPU’s 96th percentile and GPU’s 83rd percentile standings.

Q: Does the CPU’s 24-core configuration benefit this game?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus has 24 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. In Pc Building Simulator, the measured FPS at 1080p Low (409 FPS) indicates the CPU is not a bottleneck, but the game’s simulation logic likely uses fewer threads, as evidenced by the CPU’s single-core score of 7303 in Cinebench R23, which is more relevant for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system exhibits exceptional performance. The Low preset achieves 409 FPS average, which is the highest recorded value across all configurations. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 290 FPS, with a minimum of 246 FPS and a maximum of 333 FPS, indicating excellent frame consistency. The High preset delivers 205 FPS, while Ultra produces 195 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is only 10 FPS, suggesting that Ultra is the preferred choice for 1080p gaming, as the visual upgrade comes at a minimal performance cost.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably. Low delivers 258 FPS, Medium drops to 183 FPS (min 155, max 210), High reaches 129 FPS, and Ultra hits 123 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 1440p is 6 FPS, again making Ultra the better option for users with 120 Hz or 144 Hz monitors. The Medium preset’s minimum of 155 FPS is particularly noteworthy, as it ensures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above 144 Hz, providing a perfectly smooth experience for high-refresh displays.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more demanding. Low achieves 135 FPS, which is still high for 4K, but Medium drops to 96 FPS (min 81, max 110). High falls to 67 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 64 FPS. The transition from Medium to High represents a 30% performance loss (96 to 67 FPS), while High to Ultra is a mere 4.5% drop (67 to 64 FPS). This suggests that the Ultra preset at 4K is not worth the performance cost over High, and that Medium is the optimal choice for 4K gaming, as it provides a 43% improvement over High (96 vs 67 FPS) while maintaining acceptable visual quality.

The frame time consistency, where available, shows that the Medium preset at all resolutions has the most stable performance. At 4K Medium, the minimum of 81 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS indicate a 29 FPS spread, which is manageable. At 1440p Medium, the spread is 55 FPS (155 to 210), and at 1080p Medium, the spread is 87 FPS (246 to 333). The larger spreads at lower resolutions are due to CPU-bound scenarios, where the game’s simulation logic creates variable load.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Its base clock is 1980 MHz, boosting to 2475 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for Pc Building Simulator’s needs, as evidenced by the stable FPS at 4K Medium (96 FPS) without memory-related stutters.

The GPU’s 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output processors contribute to its 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores are present but likely underutilized in this simulation title, which does not rely on ray-traced effects or DLSS-based upscaling. The pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s are more relevant, as Pc Building Simulator involves rendering complex 3D scenes with many objects, but the GPU’s raw fill rate is more than sufficient.

The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43223, is reinforced by the measured FPS data. At 1080p Ultra, the GPU maintains 195 FPS, which is a 3.4x improvement over the 4K Ultra score of 64 FPS. This scaling is typical for a GPU with 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, as higher resolutions increase memory pressure and fill rate demands.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43223, slightly behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, 0.1% faster) and the RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, 0.1% faster), but ahead of the Quadro M6000 (43301, 0.2% faster). The RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 1% with 43667. These deltas are within noise margins, meaning the RTX 4070 SUPER’s performance in Pc Building Simulator is representative of its class. The GPU’s TDP of 220 W and suggested PSU of 550 W are not directly reflected in FPS, but the data shows that the card can sustain high clocks under load, as the 4K Medium average of 96 FPS indicates no thermal throttling.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3, totaling 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory, which is a niche feature for this desktop segment.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 5214 in Cinebench R15 multicore and 736 in single-core, 21727 in Cinebench R20 multicore and 3067 in single-core, and 51731 in Cinebench R23 multicore with 7303 in single-core. The PassMark multithread score of 60860 and single-thread score of 4823 further characterize its performance. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 84003, places it in the top tier of processors.

For Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is critical. The game’s simulation logic, which tracks component compatibility, thermal loads, and system stability, is largely single-threaded. The CPU’s single-core performance of 7303 in Cinebench R23 is excellent, but the game also benefits from the 24 cores for background tasks like physics calculations and asset loading. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (409 FPS) indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower settings, but at 1080p Ultra (195 FPS), the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as the CPU can still deliver more frames.

The CPU’s nearest rivals show that the 290K Plus is a marginal upgrade over the 285K (0.2% faster), but the gap to the AMD EPYC processors is more significant (1.1% to 1.2% faster). The AMD EPYC 7F72 is 1.3% faster, but these differences are unlikely to be noticeable in Pc Building Simulator, where the FPS is capped by the GPU at higher settings. The CPU’s 24 threads are more than adequate for this game, and the boost clock of 5.80 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks are handled with minimal latency.

The CPU’s integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU is present but unused in this configuration, as the discrete RTX 4070 SUPER handles all rendering. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage, though the RTX 4070 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which does not saturate the available lanes. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s is sufficient for the game’s data streaming, as evidenced by the stable FPS at 4K Medium, where memory bandwidth can become a bottleneck in other titles. Overall, the CPU’s performance in this game is characterized by its high single-core speed and sufficient multi-core throughput, making it a strong partner for the RTX 4070 SUPER.