Pc Building Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 101 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 38 | 54 | 76 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 73 | 103 | 145 |
| 1080p Full HD | 110 | 115 | 163 | 230 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis
Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title focused on the assembly and troubleshooting of hardware, presents a unique load profile that favors balanced component performance. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile combination produces a solid experience, but the benchmark data reveals a clear hierarchy in performance scaling that is heavily influenced by the graphics card. The measured results show that this combo is positioned in the lower-middle tier of tested configurations, delivering playable frame rates at most settings, though 4K Ultra remains out of reach.
How This Combo Ranks
The data indicates that this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile ranks 2476 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the 33rd percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly two-thirds of the tested combos deliver higher average frame rates. This rank is not a verdict on the components' raw power, but rather a reflection of the game's specific demands and how this pairing meets them. The RTX 5060 Mobile, while a modern GPU, is positioned as an entry-level mobile part, and its performance ceiling is the primary factor limiting this combo's overall standing.
When comparing the GPU to its direct rivals, the data shows a very tight cluster. The RTX 5060 Mobile's average benchmark score is 22435, which is a mere 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT's score of 22549. It is also just 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, which scores 22729. This indicates that in general compute, the RTX 5060 Mobile is on par with these cards, and the small deltas are likely within the margin of error for synthetic benchmarks. However, the combo's rank in this game suggests that the specific optimization and memory subsystem of these parts play a more significant role than the raw average score.
The CPU side tells a similar story of parity. The Core Ultra 9 185H has an average benchmark score of 35670, which is virtually identical to its nearest rivals. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (35719) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core 7 250H (35728). The largest gap is a 0.7% deficit against the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, which scores 35909. This data confirms that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this configuration; its performance is on par with other high-end mobile and desktop parts. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling across resolutions.
The overall rank of 2476 is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance tier. The RTX 5060 Mobile is a capable chip, but it is not designed to compete with high-end desktop or mobile GPUs. The data shows that this combo will deliver a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p, but will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K. The CPU's strong performance ensures that the system will not suffer from stuttering or frame drops due to processor limitations, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's raw rendering power. The conclusion is that this is a well-balanced pairing for its target market, but it is not a high-performance gaming machine.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the optimal settings for this combo. At 1920x1080, the RTX 5060 Mobile delivers a high refresh rate experience. The Low preset achieves an average of 230 FPS, which is far beyond what most displays can show. The Medium preset is still excellent at 163 FPS, with a minimum of 139 FPS, ensuring a smooth and consistent experience. The High preset drops to an average of 115 FPS, which is still very good for most users. Even the Ultra preset manages an average of 110 FPS, meaning that at 1080p, the game is fully playable at the highest visual quality. For users with a 144Hz monitor, the High or Ultra presets are the recommended choices, as they offer the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down significantly. The Low preset is still very fast at 145 FPS, but the Medium preset drops to 103 FPS, which is still very smooth. The High preset averages 73 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Ultra preset averages 69 FPS, which is at the edge of what is considered a good experience for a simulation game. The data suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot for 1440p, as it maintains a frame rate above 100 FPS while providing good visual quality. For those who prefer higher detail, the High preset is acceptable, but users should be prepared for frame rates in the 70s.
The 4K results reveal the GPU's limitations. At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only one that delivers a truly smooth experience, with an average of 76 FPS. The Medium preset drops to an average of 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS, which can feel sluggish at times. The High preset averages 38 FPS, which is not recommended for a playable experience. The Ultra preset is effectively unplayable, with an average of only 36 FPS. The recommendation for 4K is to stick with the Low preset. The data clearly shows that this combo is not intended for 4K gaming at high settings. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and its memory bandwidth are insufficient to handle the texture and shading demands at this resolution without a significant performance penalty.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data across resolutions reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. When moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at the High preset, the average frame rate drops from 115 FPS to 73 FPS, a 36.5% decrease. This is a substantial drop that is directly proportional to the increase in pixel count, which is roughly 1.77 times. This indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The CPU, with its high benchmark scores, is not being stressed enough to become a bottleneck at these settings.
Scaling from 1440p to 4K at the High preset shows an even more dramatic decline, with the average frame rate falling from 73 FPS to 38 FPS, a 47.9% decrease. This is a larger drop than the pixel count increase of 2.25 times would suggest, indicating that the GPU is hitting a hard performance wall. This is likely due to the memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity of the RTX 5060 Mobile. The 8 GB VRAM buffer is likely being exceeded at 4K with High settings, causing the GPU to use slower memory paging or reduce the level of detail, resulting in the disproportionate FPS loss.
This pattern is consistent across all settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 230 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 76 FPS, a 67% reduction. The scaling is not linear, and the performance penalty becomes more severe as the resolution increases. This is a clear sign that the GPU is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see the FPS remain relatively consistent across resolutions at the same settings, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with resolution. The data shows the opposite, confirming that the RTX 5060 Mobile is the primary constraint on this system's performance. The CPU is more than capable of feeding the GPU, but the GPU cannot keep up with the rendering demands at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo capable of running the game at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which achieves an average of 76 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 54 FPS, while the High and Ultra presets fall to 38 and 36 FPS respectively, which are not recommended for a smooth experience.
Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: The Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering an average of 103 FPS with a minimum of 88 FPS. The High preset is also viable at 73 FPS, but the Medium preset provides a better safety margin for consistent performance.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 Mobile compare to the RTX 4060 Mobile in this game?
A: The synthetic benchmark data shows they are very close, with the RTX 5060 Mobile averaging 22435 and the RTX 4060 Mobile averaging 22729, a difference of 1.3%. This suggests they perform at a similar level, and the measured FPS in this game would likely be very close.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H a bottleneck for the RTX 5060 Mobile?
A: No. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35670 is on par with its nearest rivals, and the FPS scaling across resolutions indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU has more than enough performance to avoid becoming a constraint.
Q: What is the maximum FPS this combo can achieve in this game?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 230, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is far beyond the refresh rate of most displays, indicating the game is highly playable at this resolution.
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations?
A: It ranks 2476 out of 3723 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle tier, indicating that while it is a capable system, many other configurations deliver higher performance.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the defining component in this system's gaming performance. Its specifications, including 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, provide a total bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The 8 GB VRAM is a significant factor in the game's resolution scaling. While it is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, the data suggests it is insufficient for 4K at high detail levels. The performance drop from 1440p High (73 FPS) to 4K High (38 FPS) is steep, and this is likely due to the memory buffer being exhausted.
The GPU's clock speeds are 952 MHz base and 1455 MHz boost. This is a relatively low boost clock, which reflects the power efficiency focus of this mobile part. The GPU is rated at a TDP of 45 W, which is typical for an IGP-class mobile solution. This low power envelope limits its raw compute performance. The FP32 performance is rated at 9.684 TFLOPS, which is modest compared to larger desktop GPUs. This is why the combo performs well at lower resolutions where the GPU is not as stressed, but struggles at 4K where the raw shading and texture processing power are critical.
The GPU's architecture, Blackwell 2.0, is modern, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. This is important for Pc Building Simulator, as it likely uses modern rendering features. However, the implementation on a mobile chip with this power budget is not enough to deliver high-end performance. The average benchmark score of 22435 and the 67th percentile ranking versus all GPUs confirm that this is a mid-range part. The data shows it is not a high-end gaming GPU, but rather a competent entry-level option for laptops. The RTX 5060 Mobile is the primary reason this combo ranks at 2476, as its performance ceiling dictates the frame rates across all tested settings and resolutions.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H serves as a robust foundation for this system, ensuring that the GPU is not starved for data. Its 16 cores and 22 threads are more than sufficient for a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which often involves complex physics and AI calculations. The CPU's performance is highlighted by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17984.5, which is a strong result for a mobile processor. The single-core score of 1810.5 is also respectable, ensuring that the game's main thread runs smoothly.
The CPU's architecture, Meteor Lake, is built on a 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This high boost clock is crucial for gaming, as it allows the CPU to quickly ramp up performance when needed. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is also beneficial, as it helps reduce memory latency and improves data access speeds. The CPU's memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, which is adequate for feeding the GPU. The data shows that this CPU is not a bottleneck in this configuration, as the frame rates scale directly with the GPU's workload.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 35670 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performance part. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.7% performance delta, showing that it is directly comparable to other top-tier chips. However, this raw processing power does not translate into higher frame rates in this game because the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's role is to provide a stable and consistent performance baseline, which it does admirably. The measured FPS data shows no signs of CPU-related stuttering or frame drops, even at lower resolutions where the CPU would be more heavily tasked. The Core Ultra 9 185H is a capable partner for the RTX 5060 Mobile, ensuring that the system's performance is limited only by the graphics card.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 36.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 145.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 103.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 73.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 69.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 230.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 163.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 115.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 110.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with iUltra 9 185H + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with iUltra 9 185H + RTX 5060 Mobile
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.