Pc Building Simulator

# How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 405th out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top 13.5% of all configurations. This is a strong result for a mid-range desktop pairing, indicating that the combination delivers well above-average performance in this simulation title.

The combo's position becomes more meaningful when examining the individual components' standings. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards. Both components are comfortably above the median, and their combined ranking reflects that neither part is a significant bottleneck in this game. The data suggests that Pc Building Simulator scales reasonably well with both CPU and GPU resources, allowing this pairing to leverage its balanced strengths.

When compared to other tested configurations, this combo's rank of 405 out of 3002 means it outperforms roughly 86.5% of all tested pairings. This is particularly noteworthy because Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that can be sensitive to CPU performance due to its complex system-building mechanics, yet the Core Ultra 5 225 handles this workload effectively without dragging down the overall result.

The GPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (deltaPct -0.1), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (deltaPct -0.2). These are all within 0.2% of the RTX 4070 SUPER's average score, indicating that the GPU is performing exactly as expected for its class. The CPU's nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (deltaPct 0), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (deltaPct -0.2), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (deltaPct -0.4) — show similar consistency, with no significant performance deviations.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER brings 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This memory configuration is well-suited for Pc Building Simulator, which does not require excessive VRAM but benefits from the ample capacity when running at higher resolutions and detail settings.

Clock speeds are substantial: the base clock runs at 1980 MHz, boosting up to 2475 MHz. The memory operates at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). These clocks contribute to the GPU's raw compute capabilities, which include 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 35.48 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (1:1 ratio). For a simulation game that renders complex 3D environments with numerous system components, this level of throughput ensures smooth frame delivery across most settings.

The GPU's architectural features — 7168 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs — provide the texture and pixel processing headroom needed for the game's detailed component models. The 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores add ray tracing and AI acceleration capabilities, though Pc Building Simulator primarily relies on traditional rasterization. The pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s are more than adequate for the game's visual demands.

Benchmark data shows the GPU achieving a PassMark G3D score of 29995 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627. These scores place the RTX 4070 SUPER at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172795 and Vulkan score of 205624 indicate strong compute and API-level performance. In the context of Pc Building Simulator, these results translate to consistent frame rates, as evidenced by the measured FPS data across resolutions and settings.

The GPU's 12 GB VRAM proves sufficient even at 4K resolution, where the highest measured average FPS of 96 at Medium settings (with a minimum of 81 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS) shows no memory-related stuttering. The memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s ensures that texture streaming and scene complexity do not cause frame drops, even when building intricate systems with many visible components.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Pc Building Simulator with this combo?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 129 FPS, while at 1920x1080 with High settings it reaches 205 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution offers a strong balance between visual fidelity and performance, with all settings remaining above 123 FPS. For maximum smoothness, 1920x1080 provides averages from 195 FPS (Ultra) to 409 FPS (Low).

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, scores 43262 with a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the RTX 4070 SUPER is only 0.1% behind. The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and Quadro M6000 are also within 0.2% of this score, while the RTX 4090 Mobile is 1% ahead. This indicates the RTX 4070 SUPER is precisely positioned among its peers.

Q: Is the Core Ultra 5 225 a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 SUPER in this game?

A: No. The CPU ranks at the 85th percentile with an average benchmark score of 36938, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, scores 36945 (deltaPct 0). The measured FPS data shows no CPU-induced frame drops, with even the most demanding 4K Ultra setting maintaining an average of 64 FPS. The CPU's 10 cores and 10 threads provide sufficient processing power for the game's simulation logic.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the combo delivers an average of 67 FPS on High settings, 96 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 81 and maximum of 110 FPS), and 64 FPS on Ultra. The Low preset reaches 135 FPS. These results show that 4K is playable, with Medium being the sweet spot for maintaining high frame rates while preserving visual quality.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance influence this game?

A: The Core Ultra 5 225 scores 25891 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2609 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. With 10 cores and 10 threads, it provides strong parallel processing for the game's simulation calculations. The PassMark multithread score of 30459 and physics score of 2342 further confirm that the CPU handles complex workloads effectively, contributing to stable frame times across all tested settings.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking and what does it mean?

A: The combo ranks 405th out of 3002 tested configurations, placing it in the top 13.5% of all tested pairings. This high ranking reflects the balanced performance of both components, with the GPU at the 83rd percentile and CPU at the 85th percentile. For a simulation game that can be demanding on both CPU and GPU, this pairing demonstrates no significant weakness.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 offers the best overall experience for this combo. At this resolution and setting, the game runs at an average of 183 FPS with a minimum of 155 FPS and maximum of 210 FPS. This provides a smooth, responsive experience with ample headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, while maintaining good visual quality.

For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, the High preset at 2560x1440 is also an excellent choice, delivering an average of 129 FPS. This setting strikes a strong balance between image quality and performance, with no frame rate concerns for typical gameplay. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to 123 FPS average, which is still highly playable but offers diminishing returns for the additional visual detail.

At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers an average of 290 FPS (minimum 246, maximum 333 FPS), making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset at 205 FPS is also excellent for 1080p gaming. Even the Ultra preset maintains an average of 195 FPS, so users with 1080p displays can comfortably max out settings if desired.

For 4K gaming, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 is the recommended choice, providing an average of 96 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS. This ensures consistent performance without dropping below 60 FPS. The High preset at 67 FPS is acceptable for those who prefer higher visual quality, but the Ultra preset at 64 FPS approaches the lower boundary of comfortable gaming performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

• Low: 409 FPS average
• Medium: 290 FPS average (minimum 246, maximum 333 FPS)
• High: 205 FPS average
• Ultra: 195 FPS average

At 1080p, the combo demonstrates exceptional performance across all settings. The jump from Low to Medium shows a 119 FPS decrease (from 409 to 290 FPS), while the transition from High to Ultra is minimal at just 10 FPS (205 to 195 FPS). This indicates that the GPU has significant headroom at this resolution, with even the most demanding settings remaining far above the 144 Hz refresh rate threshold.

2560x1440:

• Low: 258 FPS average
• Medium: 183 FPS average (minimum 155, maximum 210 FPS)
• High: 129 FPS average
• Ultra: 123 FPS average

At 1440p, performance remains strong, with all settings maintaining averages above 120 FPS. The Medium preset shows the most consistent frame delivery, with a minimum of 155 FPS ensuring no noticeable drops during complex scenes. The difference between High and Ultra is only 6 FPS (129 vs 123), suggesting that Ultra provides nearly identical performance to High with potentially better visual quality.

3840x2160:

• Low: 135 FPS average
• Medium: 96 FPS average (minimum 81, maximum 110 FPS)
• High: 67 FPS average
• Ultra: 64 FPS average

At 4K, the combo transitions from high-refresh-rate territory to standard 60 FPS gaming. The Medium preset offers the best balance, with a minimum of 81 FPS providing a comfortable buffer above the 60 FPS target. The High and Ultra presets both hover in the mid-60s range, which is acceptable for 4K gaming but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. The Low preset at 135 FPS shows the GPU's raw capability at this resolution without heavy graphical effects.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process node. It operates at a base clock of 3.30 GHz and boosts up to 4.90 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. This configuration provides a strong foundation for Pc Building Simulator, which requires consistent CPU performance for its simulation mechanics.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration reduces memory latency and improves data access patterns, which is beneficial for the game's component interaction calculations. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, ensuring rapid data transfer between the processor and system memory.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 and single-core score of 3655, along with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6317 and single-core score of 891. The PassMark single-thread score of 4412 and multithread score of 30459 further demonstrate balanced performance. The CPU's percentile ranking at 85 among all processors confirms its position as a capable mid-range option.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average score are the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945, deltaPct 0), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, deltaPct -0.2), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, deltaPct -0.4), and Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, deltaPct -0.5). These small deltaPct values indicate that the Core Ultra 5 225 performs nearly identically to these alternatives, with no significant advantage or disadvantage.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is critical due to the game's simulation nature. The measured FPS data shows no CPU bottleneck, as even the highest frame rates (409 FPS at 1080p Low) are achieved without issue. The processor's 10 cores handle the game's logic threads efficiently, while the high boost clock of 4.90 GHz ensures snappy single-threaded performance for UI and menu interactions. The L3 cache of 20 MB provides ample storage for frequently accessed game data, reducing loading stutters and maintaining consistent frame delivery across all tested configurations.