Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a light simulation title where system performance is rarely the bottleneck, yet the benchmark data for the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. The measured frame rates show this pairing is exceptionally fast, delivering over 100 FPS at 1440p High and approaching 300 FPS at 1080p Low, positioning it in the top percentile of tested configurations despite the game’s modest graphical demands.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings?

A: The benchmark data records an average of 51.9 FPS at 4K Ultra. This is the most demanding tested configuration, and while playable, it is the only preset in the dataset that dips below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70104, while the i7-14700K scores 70074. The deltaPct between them is 0, indicating statistically identical performance. The i7-14700KF ranks in the 96th percentile against all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU’s position relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti holds a 74th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 30849, placing it within a 1.2% margin of its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q, which scores 31220.

Q: Which settings preset provides the highest frame rate at 1920x1080?

A: The Low preset at 1080p yields an average of 318 FPS. This is the highest measured value in the entire dataset, followed by Medium at 226.5 FPS and High at 158.9 FPS.

Q: Does the GPU’s memory configuration impact the 4K results?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 608.3 GB/s bandwidth. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops from 75.3 at Medium to 55.1 at High, suggesting that the memory subsystem is adequate but the GPU core becomes the limiting factor.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combination ranks 670th out of 1769 tested combos, placing it in the upper 38% of all systems benchmarked for Pc Building Simulator. This rank reflects its strong but not top-tier standing.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, with memory running at 19 Gbps effective. The memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6X across a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. These specifications drive a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 21.75 TFLOPS.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU’s role is evident in the scaling between presets. At 3840x2160, the jump from Low (107.4 FPS) to Medium (75.3 FPS) represents a 30% reduction, while the move from High (55.1 FPS) to Ultra (51.9 FPS) is a mere 6% drop. This pattern indicates that the GPU is not fully saturated until the Ultra preset is active. At 2560x1440, the difference between High (98.5 FPS) and Ultra (97 FPS) is nearly negligible, suggesting that the rendering workload at these settings is similar. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the game’s asset loading, as no memory-related stutter is indicated by the data.

The GPU’s benchmark scores further contextualize its role. The PassMark G3D score is 23356, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3478. These figures place the RTX 3070 Ti in the 74th percentile, with rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (score 31112) sitting only 0.8% higher. The data shows the GPU is a well-balanced mid-range-to-high-end part, but in this simulation title, its performance headroom is substantial.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS values, the optimal preset depends on the target resolution and frame rate preference. At 1920x1080, even the Ultra preset delivers 149.8 FPS, which is far beyond the refresh rate of most standard monitors. The Low preset achieves 318 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss is unnecessary for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 226.5 FPS offers a balanced compromise, providing high frame rates while retaining reasonable graphical quality.

At 2560x1440, the High preset (98.5 FPS) and Ultra preset (97 FPS) are nearly identical in performance, differing by only 1.5 FPS. This suggests that users can select Ultra without a meaningful frame rate penalty, making it the recommended choice for 1440p. The Medium preset (144.3 FPS) is also viable for those prioritizing higher refresh rates.

For 3840x2160, the Ultra preset (51.9 FPS) falls below the 60 FPS mark, which may be noticeable in a simulation where interface responsiveness is important. The High preset (55.1 FPS) is marginally better, while the Medium preset (75.3 FPS) provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The data recommends Medium at 4K as the best experience, as it maintains smoothness without a severe graphical downgrade. The Low preset (107.4 FPS) is available but undermines the visual detail that makes the simulation engaging.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high across all presets. The Low setting averages 318 FPS, Medium averages 226.5 FPS, High averages 158.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 149.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 91.5 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 9.1 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at the top end.

At 2560x1440, the values are still robust but show more separation. Low averages 204 FPS, Medium averages 144.3 FPS, High averages 98.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 97 FPS. The most significant drop occurs between Medium and High, a reduction of 45.8 FPS, suggesting that High preset introduces a substantially heavier workload.

At 3840x2160, the performance scales predictably with settings. Low averages 107.4 FPS, Medium averages 75.3 FPS, High averages 55.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 51.9 FPS. The delta between Low and Medium is 32.1 FPS, while the delta between High and Ultra is 3.2 FPS. This resolution sees the largest relative impact from preset changes, with Ultra nearly halving the frame rate of Low.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 670th out of 1769 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator. This position in the 38th percentile of all configurations indicates that while the hardware is strong, many other systems achieve higher frame rates in this particular title. Because the game is not graphically intensive, the ranking is likely influenced by other factors such as memory configuration or storage speed, which are not reflected in the CPU and GPU scores alone.

The CPU’s individual ranking is stronger, sitting in the 96th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9115 (deltaPct 0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (deltaPct -0.4%), showing that the i7-14700KF is competitive at the top of the desktop market. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking is lower, reflecting its position relative to newer and higher-tier cards. The overall combo rank of 670 suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, as the CPU has more headroom than the graphics card.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is less critical than in more complex simulations, but the data still shows its capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 44557, while the single-core score is 6290, indicating strong performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 52425 and single-thread score of 4480 corroborate this. With a 96th percentile ranking, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in this game, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates across resolutions.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the i7-14700K, shows a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two chips perform identically in synthetic benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is 0.4% faster in average score, but the i7-14700KF holds its own. Given that the game’s physics and logic are not heavily threaded, the single-core performance is likely the more relevant metric, and the 6290 R23 single-core score ensures that the CPU will not introduce frame pacing issues. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz provides ample headroom for the game’s simulation logic, making the CPU a non-factor in the overall frame rate results.