Pc Building Simulator

The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pairing delivers a commanding performance profile in Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title that is far more demanding on the CPU than the GPU. The data shows that the combo ranks 433rd out of 1769 tested combinations, placing it in the top quarter of all systems. While the GPU is a high-end Ampere part with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, the benchmark results reveal that the processor is the primary engine driving frame rates, especially at lower resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across three resolutions and four quality presets, interpreting what the numbers mean for someone building a system around these components.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The combo ranks 433rd out of 1769 tested combinations, which places it in the 75th percentile of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the Core i7-12700K compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845?

A: The Intel chip has an average benchmark score of 35684, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's score of 35802. This makes the performance difference negligible in synthetic workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to the RTX 3090?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41224, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 3090's score of 41441. The two cards are effectively tied in overall compute performance.

Q: What is the best FPS result recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate is 364 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This indicates a massive performance headroom for esports-style or lightweight play.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in this title?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo maintains an average of 61 FPS, which is right at the threshold for smooth gameplay. Lowering to High settings at 4K yields 61.4 FPS, showing a negligible difference between those two presets.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At 1080p High, the average FPS is 182.7, while at 4K High it drops to 61.4. This represents a 66% reduction in frame rate, highlighting the significant load increase on the GPU at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 433 out of 1769 tested systems places it in the top 25% of all configurations. This is a strong position, but it is not at the absolute top, which is expected given that the game is a simulation that heavily leverages CPU single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Core i7-12700K, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, scores 29241 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4128 in single-core, which are robust numbers. However, the nearest rivals show how tight the competition is: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35802 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 35940 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35468 (0.6% lower). This indicates that the 12700K is in a highly contested performance band where a few percentage points separate many CPUs.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3080 Ti's average benchmark score of 41224 puts it just behind the RTX 3090 by 0.5%, and also behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 by 0.9% and the RTX 5070 by 1.1%. These deltas are all within 1.6%, meaning that in raw compute, the 3080 Ti is essentially on par with these other high-end cards. However, the measured FPS in this game shows that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p, as the frame rates scale dramatically with resolution. For a builder, this rank suggests the combo is well-balanced for 1440p and 4K gaming, but it is somewhat overkill for 1080p where the CPU becomes the bottleneck.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of CPU-bound performance at lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces 364 FPS, which is an extremely high number that most monitors cannot even display. When the resolution increases to 1440p Low, the FPS drops to 231.7, and at 4K Low it falls to 120.8. This scaling indicates that the CPU is doing the heavy lifting at 1080p, and the GPU is not being fully utilized until the resolution increases. The drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is a 67% reduction in FPS, which is a massive hit that points directly to the GPU becoming more of a factor as pixel count grows.

At High settings, the scaling is different. The FPS drops from 182.7 at 1080p to 116.5 at 1440p (a 36% reduction), and then to 61.4 at 4K (a further 47% reduction). This shows that the GPU load is increasing more steeply with resolution at higher quality settings, but the initial 1080p to 1440p drop is still modest, suggesting the CPU is still contributing to the frame rate. At Ultra settings, the FPS is 171.4 at 1080p, 110.9 at 1440p, and 61 at 4K. The fact that 1080p Ultra (171.4 FPS) is only slightly lower than 1080p High (182.7 FPS) indicates that the CPU is still not the primary constraint even at the highest quality settings at 1080p. The data confirms that for this simulation, the RTX 3080 Ti is more than capable of handling the graphics load, and the 12700K is what keeps frame rates high at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured results provides a complete picture of the combo's capabilities. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 364 at Low, 257.9 at Medium, 182.7 at High, and 171.4 at Ultra. The gap between High and Ultra is only about 11 FPS, which is a small difference and suggests that the CPU is starting to limit performance at these high frame rates. At 2560x1440, the averages are 231.7 at Low, 164 at Medium, 116.5 at High, and 110.9 at Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant at each setting, but the system still delivers over 110 FPS at the highest quality preset, which is excellent for a 1440p monitor.

At 3840x2160, the averages drop to 120.8 at Low, 83.9 at Medium, 61.4 at High, and 61 at Ultra. Here, the difference between High and Ultra is negligible (0.4 FPS), indicating that the GPU is fully saturated and the settings have little impact on the final frame rate. The 4K results show that the RTX 3080 Ti is the limiting factor at this resolution, as the CPU has more than enough headroom. The most interesting data point is the 4K Low result of 120.8 FPS, which is higher than the 1080p Ultra result of 171.4 FPS, but still lower than the 1440p Low result of 231.7 FPS. This shows that even at 4K with low graphics settings, the GPU is not fully utilized, and the frame rate is still being constrained by something other than pure pixel fill rate.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the GA102 chip with a die size of 628 mm² and 28,300 million transistors. It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and the memory runs at 19 Gbps effective. These specifications are substantial, but the benchmark data shows that in Pc Building Simulator, the GPU is not the primary performance driver at lower resolutions. The GPU's compute power is evidenced by its passmark G3D score of 26896 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077, but the measured FPS does not correlate with these scores until the resolution reaches 4K.

At 4K, the GPU's role becomes more apparent. The FPS at 4K Low (120.8) is significantly lower than at 1440p Low (231.7), which is a drop of about 48%. This is a clear sign that the GPU's pixel processing capability is being taxed. The memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s is crucial for handling the large texture data at 4K, and the 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for this game at these settings. The data suggests that the RTX 3080 Ti is a very capable card for this title, but it is not the bottleneck until the resolution is pushed to 4K with high-quality settings. The GPU's percentile ranking of 83rd among all GPUs confirms it is a high-end part, but its performance in this specific game is more dependent on the CPU's ability to feed it frames.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For a 1080p monitor with a 144Hz or 165Hz refresh rate, the Ultra preset at 171.4 FPS is the best choice, as it provides a high frame rate that exceeds most monitor refresh rates while delivering the best visual quality. The High preset at 182.7 FPS offers a slight increase in frame rate but with lower visual fidelity, making Ultra the better value for the small FPS difference. For 1440p, the Ultra preset at 110.9 FPS is also recommended, as it comfortably exceeds 60 FPS and provides a smooth experience on a 144Hz monitor. The High preset at 116.5 FPS is nearly identical, so players can choose Ultra for the best visuals without a significant FPS penalty.

For 4K gaming, the choice is more nuanced. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is right at the edge of smooth gameplay, but the High preset at 61.4 FPS offers the same performance with slightly reduced quality. Since the difference between High and Ultra at 4K is only 0.4 FPS, the High preset is the better recommendation, as it provides a more stable frame rate with essentially identical visual output. The Medium preset at 83.9 FPS is also a viable option for players who want a higher frame rate on a 120Hz 4K display, but the visual quality drop is noticeable. The data clearly shows that the system is capable of running the game at maximum settings at 1080p and 1440p, while at 4K, the High preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.