Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a Simulation title released on 2019-01-28, was measured with an Intel Core i5-14600KF and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. This combination ranks 251st out of 1769 tested combos in this game, with the CPU sitting at the 93rd CPU percentile and the GPU at the 84th GPU percentile. Measured average FPS spans from 410.7 at 1920x1080 Low to 63 at 3840x2160 Ultra. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $294; the GPU has a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

How This Combo Ranks

The 251st-place finish out of 1769 tested combos places this pairing in the upper part of the tested list. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49367, and the GPU’s average benchmark score is 42576. These component scores line up with the percentile data: 93 for the CPU and 84 for the GPU.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals by average benchmark score, the i5-14600KF is 0.4% above the Intel Core i5-14600K (49166), 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (49062), and 1.4% above the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698). The only listed CPU rival with a higher average score is the AMD EPYC 4345P (49595), which is 0.5% above the i5-14600KF.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER trails the NVIDIA RTX A6000 by 0.2% (42653) and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE by 0.3% (42723). It leads the AMD Radeon Pro 580X by 1.4% (41991) and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 by 1.6% (41897). These comparisons use the average benchmark scores recorded for each part, and in both cases the paired components land within a narrow band of their nearest rivals.

The combination rank therefore reflects a CPU that is above almost all tested processors paired with a GPU that also sits above most tested GPUs. The measured frame rates in the following sections show how that positioning translates into actual Pc Building Simulator performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip in Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The chip contains 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, 80 ROPs, 56 RT cores, and 224 tensor cores. The GPU has a 1980 MHz base clock and a 2475 MHz boost clock. Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, with a 1313 MHz memory clock and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU’s TDP is 220 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W.

The GPU’s computed performance appears in its benchmark scores: PassMark G3D is 29995, PassMark GPU compute is 17108, and Geekbench OpenCL is 192684. In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU’s role is most visible in the 3840x2160 rows. At 4K, the measured average FPS is 135.6 on Low, 94.3 on Medium, 67.3 on High, and 63 on Ultra. The spread from High to Ultra is small, while Low is much faster.

This pattern indicates that the GPU is doing the heavy rendering work at higher resolutions. The 12 GB frame buffer and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to keep the image pipeline moving through the measured settings, but the 4K data still shows a clear quality-based frame rate cost. At lower resolutions, the same GPU reaches 410.7 fps at 1080p Low, meaning the RTX 4070 SUPER is not the limiting component in every measured row.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a Core 14th Gen part in Raptor Lake-R architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has 14 cores and 20 threads on Intel Socket 1700, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock is 3.50 GHz and the boost clock is 5.30 GHz, with a 125 W TDP.

The CPU’s benchmark results show both strong multi-core and single-core performance. Cinebench R15 multicore is 3315 and single-core is 468. Cinebench R20 multicore is 13813 and single-core is 1950. Cinebench R23 multicore is 32889 and single-core is 4643. Geekbench multi-core is 15636 and single-core is 2778. PassMark multithread is 38697 and single-thread is 4273.

In Pc Building Simulator, the highest measured average FPS — 410.7 at 1920x1080 Low — demands strong per-core throughput. The single-thread scores are useful context for that result. The 20 threads and the multicore scores provide additional headroom for the simulation side of the game. The data does not show the CPU becoming the primary limit at 4K, because FPS changes substantially with resolution. Instead, the CPU’s contribution is most apparent in the high frame-rate rows at 1080p, where the GPU can produce very large frame counts if the CPU keeps up.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured rows for this combo are listed below. Only average FPS values are recorded; minimum and maximum FPS fields are null.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|---|---:|---:|

| 3840x2160 | High | 67.3 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 135.6 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 94.3 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 63 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 130.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 260.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 185.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 123.1 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 201.5 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 410.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 291.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 196.4 |

The highest measured average is 410.7 at 1080p Low. The lowest measured average is 63 at 4K Ultra. At each resolution, the settings order by average FPS as Low, Medium, High, Ultra. The High and Ultra rows are close at every resolution: 201.5 vs 196.4 at 1080p, 130.1 vs 123.1 at 1440p, and 67.3 vs 63 at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The measured data shows a clear FPS drop as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 and then to 3840x2160. On Low, the average goes from 410.7 to 260.3 to 135.6. On Medium, it goes from 291.9 to 185.3 to 94.3. On High, it goes from 201.5 to 130.1 to 67.3. On Ultra, it goes from 196.4 to 123.1 to 63.

This consistent resolution sensitivity points to the GPU as the limiting component at high pixel counts. If the CPU were the main constraint, raising the resolution would not change the average FPS as much, because CPU work is largely independent of pixel count. Here every step from 1080p to 4K lowers the result by a large margin in every preset, so the RTX 4070 SUPER is the part that controls how this game scales across resolutions.

The 1080p results remain the least constrained by the GPU. At 1080p Low, the 410.7 average is far above every 1440p and 4K row. At 1440p, even Ultra stays at 123.1, which is still well above the 4K Medium result of 94.3. The 4K tier is where the combination shows the most GPU pressure, with Low at 135.6, Medium at 94.3, High at 67.3, and Ultra at 63.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured average FPS rows, the recommended settings depend on which resolution is being targeted.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is measured at 196.4 fps, while High is at 201.5 fps. The two presets are close enough that Ultra provides essentially the same measured average while applying the highest quality preset. Medium is available at 291.9 fps for more frame-rate headroom, and Low reaches 410.7 fps for the fastest measured 1080p result.

At 2560x1440, Ultra returns 123.1 fps and High returns 130.1 fps. This is a close pair, so either preset is defensible depending on quality preference. Medium at 185.3 fps gives a much larger margin, and Low at 260.3 fps is the fastest measured 1440p option.

At 3840x2160, the measured rows are Low 135.6, Medium 94.3, High 67.3, and Ultra 63. For 4K, High is the preferred compromise: it remains well ahead of Ultra while staying above Medium’s large quality step, and its 67.3 average is still a usable result. Ultra can be chosen for maximum visual settings, since it remains close to High in the data. Medium is the better option when a higher average FPS margin is desired at 4K. The overall measured data points to 1440p Ultra as the strongest balance between visual preset and average FPS, because it keeps a 123.1 average while avoiding the sharp frame-rate drop seen at 4K.