Pc Building Simulator

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 pairing delivers surprisingly playable results in Pc Building Simulator, a game that leans heavily on the CPU to simulate component interactions. The data shows this combo ranks 2894th out of 3723 tested configurations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, yet the measured frame rates tell a story of consistent 1080p and 1440p capability, with 4K remaining a challenge. This analysis breaks down the specific roles of the processor and graphics card, interprets the benchmark scores, and provides a clear roadmap for settings adjustments based on the measured FPS data.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 98 frames per second. This is the lowest average at 1080p among the tested presets, but it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Core i5-14400F achieves an average benchmark score of 32279, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. It is 0.1% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i9-11900, while being 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo at 2560x1440?

A: The highest average frame rate at 1440p is 130 FPS, achieved with Low settings. For comparison, the Medium preset delivers an average of 92 FPS, while High and Ultra settings yield 65 FPS and 62 FPS, respectively.

Q: Is the RX 6600's performance more aligned with desktop or mobile GPUs?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 19036. The data shows it is effectively tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0% delta), but it is 0.1% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, indicating a performance level that sits near the boundary between older desktop workstation cards and modern mobile solutions.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?*

A: The data indicates that 4K is not a strong suit for this combo. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages only 32 FPS, and High settings average 34 FPS. Even dropping to Medium only raises the average to 48 FPS, which is still below the ideal smoothness threshold.

Q: What is the FPS range for the Medium preset at 1920x1080?

A: At 1080p Medium, the measured average FPS is 146, with a minimum of 124 FPS and a maximum of 168 FPS. This wide range demonstrates solid frame pacing with no severe dips below playable levels.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU's boost clock is rated at 2491 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz, and its FP32 performance is rated at 8.928 TFLOPS. These specifications place the RX 6600 in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating mid-range standing.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role is less about raw polygon pushing and more about handling the rendering of the 3D workspace and any visual effects. The benchmark results show that the RX 6600's performance scales predictably with resolution. At 1920x1080, the card is clearly not the bottleneck, as even Ultra settings produce an average of 98 FPS and Low settings hit 206 FPS. The story changes at 3840x2160, where the 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory interface become limiting factors. The Ultra preset drops to a 32 FPS average, and the High preset only manages 34 FPS, suggesting that the GPU is struggling to maintain fill rates at 4K.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 19036 places it in close competition with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. While the deltaPct between these rivals is minimal (0.1% or less), it highlights that the RX 6600's compute capabilities are on par with a modern laptop GPU, which is a relevant data point for a game that might have lighter graphical demands. The measured FPS data confirms that for this simulation title, the RX 6600 provides a smooth experience at mainstream resolutions, but its architectural limits become apparent when the pixel count is quadrupled.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It features 20 MB of shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU achieves a strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

For Pc Building Simulator, the CPU is the primary driver of performance due to the game's simulation mechanics. The 10 cores and 16 threads are leveraged to calculate system temperatures, power draw, and component compatibility in real-time. The data shows that this processing power is more than sufficient for the game's demands. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches an average of 206 FPS, which suggests the CPU is feeding the GPU efficiently without becoming a bottleneck. Even when the GPU is stressed at 4K Ultra, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3055) ensures that the simulation logic doesn't cause frame hitches, as the minimum FPS for 4K Medium is 41.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 32279 puts it in a dead heat with its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and the Intel Core i9-11900. The deltaPct values are all under 0.5%, indicating that the 14400F offers comparable compute power to these other mid-range and older high-end chips. In the context of this game, the high multi-core score (Passmark multithread score of 25470) is particularly relevant, as it directly correlates with the ability to handle the game's complex simulation threads without degradation. The i5-14400F's performance is a key reason why the combo can maintain high frame rates at 1440p, where the CPU must keep up with the increased render workload.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 is ranked 2894th out of 3723 tested combos in the database for Pc Building Simulator. This ranking places the pairing in the lower 22% of all configurations, which might seem alarming at first glance. However, the ranking is a holistic measure that includes extreme high-end systems with multiple GPUs and flagship processors. The measured FPS data provides a more nuanced view of the combo's actual gaming capability.

This rank of 2894 suggests that while the combo is not a top-tier performer, it is far from being an egregious bottleneck. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking indicate that both components are above average individually. The combined rank is likely dragged down by the GPU's relative weakness compared to the CPU, meaning the RX 6600 is the limiting factor in this pairing. In synthetic terms, the CPU outperforms its rivals by a hair (0.1% to 0.5% deltaPct), while the GPU trades blows with mobile and older workstation parts.

For a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, the ranking is less critical than raw FPS. The data shows that the combo can deliver an average of 146 FPS at 1080p Medium and 92 FPS at 1440p Medium, which are excellent results for a mid-range system. The 2894th rank is a reflection of the database's inclusion of high-refresh-rate 1080p and 4K beasts, but the measured performance indicates that this combo offers a smooth, stutter-free experience at the most common gaming resolutions. The rank also highlights the balance of the system; neither component is so weak that it cripples the other, allowing for predictable scaling across settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a complete picture of its performance envelope.

3840x2160 (4K):

At 4K, the combo is clearly out of its comfort zone. The Ultra preset produces an average of 32 FPS, which is unplayable for most users. High settings marginally improve the average to 34 FPS. The Medium preset is the only 4K option with a minimum FPS recorded, showing an average of 48 FPS with a range of 41 to 55 FPS. Low settings are the only playable option at 4K, yielding an average of 68 FPS. The data indicates that 4K should be reserved for Low settings, as anything higher will result in a sub-60 FPS experience.

2560x1440 (1440p):

1440p represents the sweet spot for this hardware. The Low preset achieves a high average of 130 FPS, which is excellent for fast-paced movement in the game's UI. The Medium preset delivers a robust average of 92 FPS, with a minimum of 78 FPS and a maximum of 106 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience with no major dips. High settings bring the average down to 65 FPS, and Ultra settings are nearly identical at 62 FPS. These numbers show that the combo can handle 1440p with High or Ultra settings, sacrificing only a bit of headroom for visual fidelity.

1920x1080 (1080p):

1080p is where this combo excels, providing high frame rates across all presets. The Low preset hits an average of 206 FPS, which is well beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. Medium settings average 146 FPS, with a minimum of 124 FPS and a maximum of 168 FPS, offering a very stable experience. High settings maintain an average of 103 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage a respectable 98 FPS average. At 1080p, the combo never drops below 98 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo in Pc Building Simulator depends on the user's resolution and refresh rate priorities.

For 1920x1080 displays, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation. The average of 98 FPS is well above the 60 FPS standard and is perfectly playable on a 100Hz monitor. The difference between High (103 FPS) and Ultra (98 FPS) is minimal, so there is no reason to sacrifice the highest visual quality settings for a marginal frame rate gain. If the user has a 144Hz or higher refresh rate panel, the Medium preset at 146 FPS is the best choice, as it provides a notable FPS boost while still offering a significant visual upgrade over Low.

For 2560x1440 users, the High preset is the best balance. The 65 FPS average is just above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay with high visual fidelity. The Ultra preset averages 62 FPS, which is also playable, but the 3 FPS difference is not worth the potential for more frequent frame dips. The Medium preset at 92 FPS is the choice for users with a 144Hz 1440p monitor, as it provides a much smoother experience that takes full advantage of the display's capabilities.

For 3840x2160, the recommendations are straightforward. The Low preset is the only option that delivers a consistently smooth experience, averaging 68 FPS. The Medium preset's 48 FPS average is below ideal, and the High and Ultra presets (34 FPS and 32 FPS, respectively) should be avoided. Users with a 4K display should play at Low settings to maintain playability, or they should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p to unlock higher quality presets. The data clearly shows that this combo is not designed for 4K gaming, and attempting to use higher settings will result in a poor experience.