Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title that tasks players with assembling and troubleshooting virtual PCs, presents an interesting benchmark scenario for the Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The measured frame rates across different resolutions and settings reveal a system that is capable of delivering high performance, though the balance between CPU and GPU workload shifts dramatically depending on the configuration chosen. The data suggests that this combination is particularly well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, while still providing a playable experience at 4K, but the underlying bottleneck dynamics are worth examining closely.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data from 1080p to 4K shows a classic pattern of GPU load scaling, but with some notable inflection points. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 309 FPS. This is an exceptionally high frame rate, which strongly implies that the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400F, is the primary limiting component at this setting. The GPU is being fed a relatively light workload, allowing it to render frames far faster than the CPU can process the game's simulation and draw calls. This is a common scenario in simulation games, where CPU-bound logic can cap the maximum achievable FPS.

Stepping up to 1440p Low, the average FPS drops to 195, a reduction of 114 FPS from the 1080p result. This is a significant drop, but the frame rate remains incredibly high, indicating the system is still heavily CPU-bound at this resolution with Low settings. The GPU has more work to do, but the CPU is still the constraining factor. Moving to 4K Low, the FPS falls to 102. This is a substantial drop from 1440p, showing that at 4K, the GPU workload has increased enough to start shifting the bottleneck. The 4K Low result is less than half the 1080p Low result, which suggests the GPU is now the primary limiting factor.

The scaling pattern changes when looking at higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 147. This is much lower than the 309 FPS seen at Low, but still very high. The CPU is likely still a factor, but the increased GPU workload from the Ultra preset has brought the performance down. At 1440p Ultra, the average FPS is 93, and at 4K Ultra, it drops to 49. The progression from 1080p to 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a more consistent decline that is primarily attributed to the GPU. The data indicates that at Ultra settings, the RX 7700 XT is the dominant factor, with the CPU playing a smaller role.

The difference in scaling between Low and Ultra presets is the key takeaway. With Low settings, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, boosting up to 4.40 GHz, are the limiting factor. With Ultra settings, the GPU's rendering load becomes the primary constraint. The data implies that for players who prioritize maximum frame rates on a 1080p or 1440p monitor, this combo is a strong performer. For 4K gaming, even at High settings with 51 FPS, the system is playable, but the GPU is clearly the component that determines the final performance ceiling.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, with its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, provides a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. Its boost clock is rated at 2544 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz. These specifications are reflected in the benchmark results, showing the GPU's ability to handle the demands of Pc Building Simulator. The GPU's performance, as measured by its average benchmark score of 22549, places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, which scores 0.5% higher, and the RTX 4060 Mobile, which scores 0.8% lower. This places the RX 7700 XT in a competitive mid-to-high range segment.

The GPU's role in this game is most apparent at 4K resolution. At 4K High, the system produces an average of 51 FPS, while at 4K Ultra, it drops to 49 FPS. The relatively small difference between High and Ultra at 4K suggests that the GPU is nearing its limits, but it is still able to maintain a playable frame rate. The 4K Medium setting shows an average of 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS. This indicates that the GPU can handle a significant workload, but the higher settings start to tax its capabilities.

The VRAM capacity of 12 GB is a relevant factor for a game that involves managing system components. While Pc Building Simulator might not have the massive texture requirements of a modern AAA title, having 12 GB ensures that the GPU is not likely to be a bottleneck due to memory constraints. The data shows that the GPU is a strong performer, especially when paired with a capable CPU at lower resolutions. The performance difference between the RX 7700 XT and its closest rivals is minimal, with the RTX 5060 Mobile being nearly identical in average benchmark score. This suggests that in this specific game, the GPU's raw performance is a significant contributor to the high frame rates observed, particularly at 1440p and 4K where the workload is more balanced.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT ranks at 1384 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 37% of all system configurations, which is a solid result, though not a top-tier one. The data indicates that this combo is capable of delivering a high-quality gaming experience, but there are many other system pairings that can achieve higher frame rates.

The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 73, which is quite strong. This means it outperforms 73% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, has an almost identical average benchmark score, with a 0% delta. This indicates that the i5-12400F is a well-rounded performer. The GPU's percentile ranking is 67, which is also respectable, but slightly lower than the CPU's. This suggests that in this particular combination, the GPU might be the slight bottleneck in more demanding scenarios.

The combo's rank of 1384 suggests that while this system is powerful, it is not at the absolute top of the performance charts. This is likely because other combinations may feature higher-end CPUs or GPUs that can push frame rates even higher. However, for the target audience of a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, this ranking indicates a system that is more than capable of providing a smooth and detailed experience. The data shows that the system is well-balanced, with the CPU and GPU both contributing significantly to the overall performance, but the CPU has a slight edge in relative performance compared to other components in its class. This is a pairing that would not struggle with the game's demands, and the rank reflects that it sits comfortably in the upper-middle echelon of tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to use for this game with this hardware?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 2560x1440 provides an excellent balance. At High settings, it achieves an average of 98 FPS, which is very smooth. While 1920x1080 is faster, the 1440p resolution offers a significant visual upgrade with only a 57 FPS drop at High settings.

Q: Will this system be able to handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Yes, the data shows that 4K is playable. At High settings, the average FPS is 51, and at Medium, it is 72. While not as high as lower resolutions, these frame rates are acceptable for a simulation game where precise timing is less critical than in a fast-paced shooter.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck at 1080p with Low settings?

A: The data strongly suggests the CPU is the limiting factor. The average FPS of 309 at 1080p Low is very high, indicating the GPU is not being fully utilized. The Intel Core i5-12400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is likely the component that caps the frame rate at this level.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to its direct competitors in this game?

A: The RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22549. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, scores 0.5% higher, while the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 0.8% lower. This shows that the GPU's performance is very similar to these competing models, making it a competitive choice.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for the Medium settings?

A: The data provides minimum FPS only for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 186 FPS. At 2560x1440, the minimum is 118 FPS. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 61 FPS.

Q: Is this a good combo for high-refresh-rate monitors?

A: For 1080p and 1440p, yes. At 1080p High, the average is 155 FPS, and at 1440p High, it's 98 FPS. These are well above the 60 FPS threshold, making them suitable for 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, particularly at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across all combinations of resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. With Low settings, it averages 309 FPS. The Medium preset averages 219 FPS, with a minimum of 186 FPS and a maximum of 252 FPS. High settings average 155 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 147 FPS. This shows that even at the highest settings, the system is capable of driving a high-refresh-rate 1080p monitor without issue.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 195 FPS. Medium settings average 138 FPS, with a minimum of 118 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 98 FPS, and Ultra settings average 93 FPS. The 1440p results show a more pronounced scaling with settings, indicating a more balanced workload between the CPU and GPU.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The Low preset averages 102 FPS. Medium settings average 72 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS. High settings average 51 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 49 FPS. The 4K results are the most demanding, but the system still provides a playable experience, with even the Ultra preset maintaining an average above 45 FPS.

The data shows a consistent trend: the higher the resolution, the more the GPU is stressed. At 1080p, the CPU's performance is the ceiling, but at 4K, the GPU's capabilities define the limits. The only settings with min/max data are Medium, which shows that frame time consistency is maintained across all resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its 18 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant asset for gaming. The CPU's benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and a single-core score of 1680. This performance is reflected in its 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system hits 309 FPS, a figure that is likely limited by the CPU's processing power. The game involves simulating a PC's components and their interactions, which is a CPU-intensive task. The 6 cores and 12 threads are well-suited for this type of workload, allowing for smooth simulation even when many components are active.

The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is notable. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, has a nearly identical average benchmark score. This indicates that the i5-12400F is a highly competitive processor. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz allows for strong single-threaded performance, which is crucial for games that rely heavily on a single core. The data implies that the CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the RX 7700 XT, and in many scenarios, it is the component that allows such high frame rates to be achieved at 1080p and 1440p.

The CPU's 65W TDP and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory make it a versatile choice. Its performance in the PassMark multi-thread test, scoring 19433, further confirms its capability. The data shows that for this game, the CPU is a strong partner for the GPU, providing enough processing power to avoid being a bottleneck at standard gaming resolutions, while its performance is a key factor in the system's high frame rates at 1080p.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the ideal settings depend on the user's display and performance goals.

For a 1920x1080 monitor, the Ultra preset is the clear choice. With an average of 147 FPS, it provides a visually rich experience without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset is also excellent, offering 155 FPS, but the Ultra preset's higher visual fidelity is worth the minor FPS hit.

For a 2560x1440 monitor, the High preset is recommended. It averages 98 FPS, which is smooth and responsive. The Ultra preset, at 93 FPS, is also viable, but the difference in visual quality is often imperceptible, making High a more efficient choice. The Medium preset, at 138 FPS, is an option for players who prioritize frame rate above all else, but the visual downgrade is more noticeable.

For a 3840x2160 monitor, the Medium preset is the safest recommendation. It averages 72 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target for a smooth experience. The High preset, at 51 FPS, is playable but may feel less fluid in fast-moving scenes. The Low preset, at 102 FPS, is the fastest, but it significantly reduces the visual quality of the simulation.

The data suggests that the "best experience" is a trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate. For most users, the High preset at 1440p offers the best overall balance, delivering high detail with a frame rate that is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. At 4K, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, ensuring that the game remains responsive while still looking good. The Ultra preset is only recommended for those with 1080p displays where the performance cost is minimal.