Pc Building Simulator

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics presents a specific performance profile in Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title that is generally more dependent on processor throughput than on raw graphics muscle. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings reveal a system that is clearly constrained by its integrated GPU, while the 16-core processor provides a stable foundation that prevents CPU-bound bottlenecks. The data shows a predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases, with the most playable experiences found at 1080p and lower graphical presets.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, confirming that the AMD Radeon 890M integrated GPU is the primary limiting factor in this configuration. At 1080p with Low settings, the system averages 111 FPS, which drops to 70 FPS at 1440p and further to 37 FPS at 4K. This represents a 67% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings, a pattern that clearly indicates the GPU is struggling to fill the increasing pixel count.

The scaling behavior becomes more pronounced at higher settings. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 55 FPS at 1080p to 35 FPS at 1440p, then to 18 FPS at 4K. The 4K High result is essentially unplayable, while the 1440p High result is borderline. At Medium settings, the system delivers 79 FPS at 1080p, 50 FPS at 1440p, and 26 FPS at 4K. The frame time consistency also degrades with resolution, as seen in the Medium preset measurements where the 4K run has a minimum of 22 FPS and a maximum of 30 FPS, compared to the 1080p run which ranges from 67 to 90 FPS.

This scaling pattern suggests the game is heavily pixel-bound at higher resolutions. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with 16 cores and 32 threads, has ample headroom even at 1080p, so the frame rate is not being limited by processor performance. The integrated GPU’s 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs are simply not sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K, especially when graphical effects are increased. The data indicates that 1080p is the only resolution where this combo can consistently exceed 60 FPS, and even then only at Low or Medium settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this pairing of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Radeon 890M ranks 2822 out of 3002 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 6% of all configurations, which is a poor result for a system with a high-end mobile processor. The ranking reflects the significant bottleneck created by the integrated GPU, as the processor alone is capable of far better performance in CPU-bound scenarios.

The CPU itself performs exceptionally well in synthetic benchmarks, scoring 35,314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 20,992 in Geekbench multi-core. This places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 77,740. However, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 9,210 places it in only the 45th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include older discrete cards like the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and GTX 465. This massive disparity between CPU and GPU capability explains the poor overall combo ranking.

The combo rank is particularly telling because Pc Building Simulator is a game that simulates the assembly and benchmarking of PCs, meaning it may have variable load characteristics. The measured results show that the integrated GPU is the clear weak point, and the system would benefit substantially from a discrete graphics card. However, within the constraints of this integrated-only configuration, the ranking accurately reflects the limited gaming performance available at higher resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The GPU uses system shared memory, meaning its bandwidth and capacity are dependent on the system’s LPDDR5X memory configuration, which in this case is quad-channel with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

The GPU’s synthetic benchmark scores are modest, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 and a Passmark G3D score of 8,076. Its average benchmark score of 9,210 places it just below the AMD Radeon Vega 8, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, and GTX 465 in the nearest rivals list, with delta percentages of -0.1%, -0.7%, and -0.9% respectively. This indicates that the 890M performs at a level comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs from several generations ago, which is consistent with its measured in-game performance.

The GPU’s FP32 compute performance is rated at 5.939 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 185.6 GTexel/s. These specifications translate to adequate performance for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings, but the system shared memory architecture means that increasing resolution beyond 1080p places significant pressure on memory bandwidth. The measured frame rates at 4K, which average between 17 and 37 FPS depending on settings, demonstrate that the GPU is overwhelmed by the pixel workload at that resolution.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the system consistently exceeds 60 FPS. At 1080p with Low settings, the average frame rate is 111 FPS, while at Medium it drops to 79 FPS. At 1440p, the best result is 70 FPS on Low, and at 4K the best result is 37 FPS on Low.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 890M compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The 890M has an average benchmark score of 9,210, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Vega 8, 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, and 0.9% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465. This places it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs tested.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor powerful enough for this game?

A: Yes, the processor is not the bottleneck. It has 16 cores and 32 threads with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and it scores 35,314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The frame rates are limited by the integrated GPU, not the CPU.

Q: What is the expected frame rate at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?

A: The measured average frame rate at 1440p Medium is 50 FPS, with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS. This is playable but may not be smooth enough for all users, especially during scenes with heavy object movement.

Q: Does raising the settings from Low to Ultra have a significant impact on performance at 1080p?

A: Yes, the impact is substantial. At 1080p, the average frame rate drops from 111 FPS on Low to 79 FPS on Medium, 55 FPS on High, and 53 FPS on Ultra. The difference between High and Ultra is minimal, but the jump from Low to Medium is a 29% reduction in frame rate.

Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested combinations in this game?

A: This pairing ranks 2822 out of 3002 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 6% of all configurations. This low ranking is primarily due to the integrated GPU’s limited performance compared to systems with discrete graphics cards.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 64 MB shared L3 cache. The processor is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC and has a TDP of 55 W, which is relatively low for a processor with this core count, indicating efficient power management.

In synthetic benchmarks, the processor demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance, scoring 5,463 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 35,314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 20,992 in Geekbench multi-core. Its single-thread scores are also respectable, with 316 in Cinebench R15 single-core and 2,044 in Cinebench R23 single-core. The processor’s average benchmark score of 77,740 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (1.6% higher score) and the Intel Core i9-14900K (1.7% lower score).

In Pc Building Simulator, the processor’s high core count and thread count ensure that it can handle the game’s simulation logic without becoming a limiting factor. The measured frame rates show no signs of CPU-induced stuttering or frame drops, as the performance scales consistently with resolution and settings changes. The processor’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, provided by quad-channel LPDDR5X, also helps feed the integrated GPU, although this shared bandwidth becomes a constraint at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s preference for visual quality versus smoothness. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 111 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, making it the best choice for competitive or fast-paced play. The Medium preset at 1080p still offers a solid 79 FPS average, with a minimum of 67 FPS, providing a good balance between visual fidelity and performance.

For users who prioritize visual quality, the High preset at 1080p yields 55 FPS on average, which is playable but may exhibit occasional dips below 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p provides only marginal improvement over High (53 FPS average) and is not recommended, as the performance cost is not justified by the visual gains. At 1440p, the Low preset is the only viable option, delivering 70 FPS average, while Medium drops to 50 FPS and High falls to 35 FPS. At 4K, none of the presets are recommended, as even Low averages only 37 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay.

The data suggests that the best experience is achieved at 1080p with Medium settings, offering a 79 FPS average with a minimum of 67 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while maintaining better visual quality than the Low preset. For users with less demanding expectations, 1440p Low at 70 FPS is also acceptable, but the frame rate consistency is not as strong as the 1080p Medium result.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 resolution, the system delivers an average of 18 FPS on High settings, 37 FPS on Low, 26 FPS on Medium, and 17 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset has the only complete frame rate data, with a minimum of 22 FPS and a maximum of 30 FPS. These results are uniformly below playable thresholds, making 4K unsuitable for this combo.

At 2560x1440 resolution, the average frame rates are 35 FPS on High, 70 FPS on Low, 50 FPS on Medium, and 33 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS, indicating some variability but generally playable performance. The Low preset at 1440p is the only setting that exceeds 60 FPS, with an average of 70 FPS.

At 1920x1080 resolution, the system achieves its best results: 55 FPS on High, 111 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium, and 53 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset has a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 90 FPS, providing a stable experience above 60 FPS. The Low preset at 1080p is the highest measured frame rate in the entire dataset, with an average of 111 FPS. The High and Ultra presets at 1080p are nearly identical in performance, with averages of 55 and 53 FPS respectively, suggesting that the Ultra preset offers no tangible benefit over High in this game.