Evolve

Evolve

AVERAGE FPS
38
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 38 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 13 18 23 30
1440p QHD 22 32 41 53
1080p Full HD 33 48 61 79

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 30
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 High 18
3840x2160 Ultra 13
2560x1440 Low 53
2560x1440 Medium 41
2560x1440 High 32
2560x1440 Ultra 22
1920x1080 Low 79
1920x1080 Medium 61
1920x1080 High 48
1920x1080 Ultra 33

Evolve with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 890M, In-Depth Analysis

Settings Recommendations

For Evolve, the measured frame rates across the tested presets show a clear hierarchy at every resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 79 FPS average, which is the only setting that exceeds the 60 FPS threshold for smooth playability. The Medium preset follows at 61 FPS average, with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 70 FPS, placing it just at the edge of the playable range. The High preset drops to 48 FPS, while Ultra falls to 33 FPS, both of which are below the ideal smoothness threshold for a fast-paced FPS title.

At 2560x1440, the situation becomes more constrained. The Low preset produces 53 FPS average, which is the only playable option at this resolution. Medium yields 41 FPS average with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS, while High drops to 32 FPS and Ultra to 22 FPS. The data suggests that for 1440p gaming, users must accept either the Low preset for near-playable performance or Medium for a more visually acceptable experience with occasional frame dips.

At 3840x2160, none of the presets reach playable frame rates. Low produces 30 FPS average, Medium produces 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 27 FPS, High produces 18 FPS, and Ultra produces 13 FPS. The measured results indicate that 4K is not a viable option for this combination in Evolve. Based on the data, the recommended experience is the Low preset at 1920x1080, which provides the best balance of playability and visual fidelity, or the Medium preset at 1080p if the user prioritizes visual quality over a comfortable frame rate margin.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its silicon contains 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, with a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 185.6 GTexel/s, and the FP32 performance is 5.939 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance matching at 5.939 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is rated at 15 W, and the interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

The memory configuration is System Shared, meaning the GPU relies on the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bus width and bandwidth are also System Shared and System Dependent, respectively. This shared memory architecture is a critical factor in the measured performance. In Evolve, the frame rates scale linearly with resolution and settings, which points to the GPU as the primary constraint. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combination achieves 79 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 30 FPS, a reduction of more than half. This pattern is consistent with a GPU that is limited by both its compute throughput and its memory subsystem.

The Radeon 890M's benchmark scores place it in the 45th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 9210. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Vega 8, which scores 9221 with a deltaPct of -0.1, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, which scores 9273 with a deltaPct of -0.7. These comparisons indicate that the 890M sits just below the performance level of a GTX 960 in general benchmarks, which aligns with the measured FPS results in Evolve. The 890M's performance in DirectX 11 benchmarks (score 73) versus DirectX 12 (score 37) suggests that the GPU is more efficient in older API workloads, which is relevant for a 2015 title like Evolve.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, with the codename Strix Halo. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is rated at 55 W, and the socket is AMD Socket FP11. The processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². Memory support is LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35314, and single-core is 2044. Geekbench scores are 20992 for multi-core and 2464 for single-core. In PassMark, the multi-thread score is 54934, and single-thread is 4147. The processor ranks in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (score 76513, deltaPct 1.6) and the Intel Core i9-14900K (score 79097, deltaPct -1.7), indicating that the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is competitive with high-end desktop processors.

In the context of Evolve, the CPU's role is less critical than the GPU's, given that the measured frame rates decline steeply with increased resolution and settings, which is a GPU-bound pattern. However, the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, along with its high boost clock of 5.10 GHz, ensure that it is unlikely to bottleneck the integrated GPU. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the frame rate reaches 79 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit for this title, but at higher settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 316, is more relevant for game logic and draw calls, and it appears sufficient for the demands of Evolve.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the AMD Radeon 890M ranks 3488 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve, placing it in the bottom 6% of all tested configurations. This low ranking is primarily attributable to the integrated GPU's performance ceiling, as the CPU itself ranks in the 95th percentile among all processors. The data shows a significant mismatch between the CPU's capability and the GPU's output, with the GPU ranking in the 45th percentile among all GPUs.

The combo's ranking reflects the measured FPS results, which are below average for most settings and resolutions. At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 33 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 1440p, only the Low preset reaches above 50 FPS, and at 4K, no preset reaches 30 FPS. The rank of 3488 out of 3700 suggests that most other tested combinations, which likely include discrete GPUs, outperform this integrated solution by a substantial margin.

Despite the low combo ranking, the CPU's high percentile (95th) means that in CPU-bound scenarios, this combo would fare much better. However, in Evolve, the data indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at all tested settings. The nearest GPU rivals, such as the GTX 960, which is a discrete card from a previous generation, show that the 890M's performance is comparable to older mid-range hardware, which is not sufficient for modern or demanding titles at high settings.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 79 at 1080p to 53 at 1440p (a 32.9% reduction) and then to 30 at 4K (a 43.4% reduction from 1440p). This represents a total drop of 62.0% from 1080p to 4K. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 61 at 1080p to 41 at 1440p (a 32.8% reduction) and then to 23 at 4K (a 43.9% reduction from 1440p), for a total drop of 62.3%. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 48 at 1080p to 32 at 1440p (a 33.3% reduction) and then to 18 at 4K (a 43.8% reduction from 1440p), for a total drop of 62.5%. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 33 at 1080p to 22 at 1440p (a 33.3% reduction) and then to 13 at 4K (a 40.9% reduction from 1440p), for a total drop of 60.6%.

The consistency of these percentage drops across all settings is a strong indicator that the GPU is the limiting component at every resolution. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the frame rates to remain relatively flat as resolution increases, since the CPU workload would be similar. Instead, the data shows a linear scaling with pixel count, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The total pixel count from 1080p to 4K increases by a factor of 4, and the frame rates drop by roughly 60%, which suggests that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints. The System Shared memory architecture likely exacerbates this issue, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth, and the bandwidth itself is System Dependent.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are as follows: Low produces 79 FPS, Medium produces 61 FPS with a minimum of 52 and a maximum of 70, High produces 48 FPS, and Ultra produces 33 FPS. The Medium preset's frame time consistency, as indicated by the 52-70 FPS range, shows that the GPU can hold above 50 FPS in most scenarios, but there are dips that may be noticeable in fast-paced action. The jump from Low to Medium is 18 FPS, from Medium to High is 13 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 15 FPS, showing a relatively even degradation across settings.

At 2560x1440, the measured average FPS values are: Low produces 53 FPS, Medium produces 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 47, High produces 32 FPS, and Ultra produces 22 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 35 FPS is below the 40 FPS playable threshold for many users, while the Low preset remains the only option that stays above 50 FPS. The frame rate drops from 1080p to 1440p are consistent across settings, as detailed in the Resolution Scaling section.

At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS values are: Low produces 30 FPS, Medium produces 23 FPS with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 27, High produces 18 FPS, and Ultra produces 13 FPS. None of these values are playable for a competitive FPS title, and the data clearly indicates that 4K is not a viable resolution for this combo in Evolve. The Medium preset's minimum of 20 FPS is below the threshold for even casual play, and the Ultra preset's 13 FPS average is essentially a slideshow. The data shows that the combo's performance is best suited for 1080p gaming at Low or Medium settings, with 1440p possible only at Low settings for a playable experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo in Evolve at 1080p?

A: The Low preset produces 79 FPS average at 1920x1080, which is the highest frame rate measured. The Medium preset delivers 61 FPS average with a minimum of 52 FPS, which is also playable, but the Low preset provides a more comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Evolve?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 30 at Low settings, and the Ultra preset only reaches 13 FPS. The data shows that 4K is not a viable option for this combination in Evolve.

Q: Which component is the limiting factor in this combo's performance?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rates drop by roughly 60% from 1080p to 4K across all settings, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 45th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 890M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (score 9221) and 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (score 9273). This places it in a similar performance tier as those older mid-range GPUs.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations in Evolve?

A: The combo ranks 3488 out of 3700 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 6% of all configurations. This low rank is primarily due to the integrated GPU's performance limitations.

Q: Does the Medium preset provide a consistent frame rate at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset produces an average of 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS. The minimum is below the 40 FPS playable threshold, indicating potential frame dips during intense gameplay.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket AMD Socket FP11
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon 890M

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2900 MHz MHz
TDP 15 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 890M in Evolve

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 30.0
3840x2160 Medium 23.0
3840x2160 High 18.0
3840x2160 Ultra 13.0
2560x1440 Low 53.0
2560x1440 Medium 41.0
2560x1440 High 32.0
2560x1440 Ultra 22.0
1920x1080 Low 79.0
1920x1080 Medium 61.0
1920x1080 High 48.0
1920x1080 Ultra 33.0

Evolve with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Other GPUs

See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Evolve with 890M + Other CPUs

See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + 890M

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.