Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator’s measured frame rates with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti reveal a clear scaling pattern. At 1080p, the Low preset produces 424.4 FPS, dropping to 317.3 FPS on Medium, 226 FPS on High, and 216.6 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, those figures fall to 281 FPS, 202.2 FPS, 143.3 FPS, and 133.9 FPS respectively. At 4K, the same settings yield 150.5 FPS, 108.1 FPS, 76.9 FPS, and 73.3 FPS. The relative drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial: on Ultra, performance falls by roughly 66%, while on Low, it falls by about 65%. This consistent percentage decline across all presets indicates that the game’s load scales heavily with resolution, but the GPU still has enough headroom to maintain playable frame rates even at the highest resolution tested.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows that resolution scaling in Pc Building Simulator is largely linear in terms of workload, but the frame rate impact is more pronounced at lower settings. At 1080p Low, the system delivers 424.4 FPS, which is an exceptionally high ceiling that suggests the CPU is doing most of the heavy lifting at that point. By 1440p Low, that number drops to 281 FPS, a 34% reduction, and at 4K Low it falls to 150.5 FPS, a further 46% cut from 1440p. This pattern indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. However, even at 4K Low, the frame rate remains above 150 FPS, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti is not overwhelmed by the simulation’s rendering demands at lower quality settings.

When the preset is raised to Ultra, the frame rate at 1080p is 216.6 FPS, which is still very high but notably lower than the Low preset’s 424.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows as resolution increases: at 1440p, the difference is 147.1 FPS (281 vs 133.9), but at 4K, it shrinks to 77.2 FPS (150.5 vs 73.3). This convergence suggests that the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint at higher resolutions, regardless of the quality preset. In contrast, at 1080p, the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU with draw calls is more relevant, as evidenced by the larger spread between presets. The benchmark results indicate that the system is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, where even Ultra settings maintain an average above 133 FPS, while 4K Ultra still crosses the 60 FPS threshold comfortably.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the best experience per the data is achieved at 1440p with the High preset, which delivers 143.3 FPS. This is a sweet spot where visual quality is high without sacrificing smoothness. At 1080p, the High preset yields 226 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors, but the jump to Ultra at 216.6 FPS offers only a marginal improvement in fidelity for a 4% performance loss. At 4K, the High preset produces 76.9 FPS, which is playable but noticeably lower than the 1440p figure. The Medium preset at 4K, at 108.1 FPS, provides a more comfortable margin above 100 FPS, making it a better choice for 4K users who prioritize frame rate over maximum visual details.

The Low preset is not recommended for this hardware combination, as it leaves significant performance on the table: at 1080p it hits 424.4 FPS, which is beyond the refresh rate of most displays, and even at 4K it reaches 150.5 FPS. The measured data suggests that the Ultra preset at 1440p, at 133.9 FPS, is the most demanding setting that still offers a triple-digit frame rate. For users with 4K displays, the Medium preset at 108.1 FPS appears to be the optimal balance, as it maintains high fluidity while avoiding the steep drop seen when moving to High (76.9 FPS) or Ultra (73.3 FPS). The data clearly points to High or Medium as the sensible choices, depending on resolution, rather than pushing to Ultra.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. In Pc Building Simulator, which is a simulation title that often involves complex logic and system management, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is relevant. The processor’s benchmarks show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 43695 and a single-core score of 6168, indicating strong all-around capability. The game’s measured frame rates at 1080p Low (424.4 FPS) suggest that the CPU is capable of driving very high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10972 and max-thread score of 12536 further confirm that the 7900X handles parallel workloads effectively.

In comparison to its nearest rivals, the 7900X’s average benchmark score is 50556, with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scoring 50598 (a delta of -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scoring 50738 (-0.4%), the Intel Core i7-13850HX scoring 50827 (-0.5%), and the Intel Core i9-13980HX scoring 50944 (-0.8%). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the 7900X is effectively on par with those processors in general compute tasks. In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is likely more pronounced at lower resolutions and settings, where the FPS differences between presets are larger. The data shows that at 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 207.8 FPS (424.4 vs 216.6), which indicates that the CPU can handle the increased draw calls and simulation logic at high frame rates without becoming a severe limiting factor.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ranks 119th out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the combo in the top 7% of all configurations in the database, indicating that it is a high-performing setup for this specific game. The rank reflects the measured FPS across all resolutions and settings, and the fact that this combo sits above the vast majority of others suggests that both components contribute effectively to the game’s performance. The 7900X’s 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with the RTX 5070 Ti’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, provide a solid foundation for a simulation title that can be demanding on both CPU and GPU resources.

Given that the combo rank is 119 out of 1769, it outperforms approximately 93% of tested configurations. This is consistent with the CPU’s percentile of 93 versus all CPUs and the GPU’s percentile of 87 versus all GPUs. The data indicates that neither component is a weak link in this pairing for Pc Building Simulator. The rank also suggests that the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and even 4K, as the measured FPS at those resolutions are strong. While the combo is not at the very top of the leaderboard, it is firmly in the upper echelon, and the performance margins over lower-ranked combos are likely significant based on the FPS figures.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 2295 MHz and boost clock is 2452 MHz, and it has 8960 shading units. In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU’s role is to handle the rendering of the simulated PC building environment, which includes detailed 3D models of components and case internals. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (73.3 FPS) shows that the GPU is capable of handling the highest resolution and quality settings, albeit with a frame rate that is just above the 60 FPS threshold. The drop from 4K High (76.9 FPS) to 4K Ultra (73.3 FPS) is only 4.7%, indicating that the Ultra preset does not impose a heavy additional load on the GPU.

The RTX 5070 Ti’s average benchmark score is 52086, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 at 52085 (a delta of 0%), meaning they are statistically identical in performance. The AMD Radeon RX 7700S scores 52505 (-0.8%), while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 scores 50826 (2.5%) and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 53414 (-2.5%). These deltas show that the RTX 5070 Ti is closely matched with other high-end GPUs. In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU’s influence is most evident at 4K, where the frame rates are lower than at 1080p or 1440p. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as reducing settings from Ultra to Low increases FPS from 73.3 to 150.5, a 105% improvement. This indicates that the GPU’s shading and memory bandwidth are key factors in determining performance at higher resolutions.