Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
90
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 90 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 34 48 68
1440p QHD 62 65 92 129
1080p Full HD 98 102 145 205

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 68
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Ultra 32
2560x1440 Low 129
2560x1440 Medium 92
2560x1440 High 65
2560x1440 Ultra 62
1920x1080 Low 205
1920x1080 Medium 145
1920x1080 High 102
1920x1080 Ultra 98

Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis

# Pc Building Simulator Performance Analysis: Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 2060

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 represents a peculiar combination for Pc Building Simulator — a simulation title that rarely stresses high-end hardware. The data shows this combo ranks 2352 out of 3002 tested configurations, placing it in the lower third of all tested combos despite featuring a top-tier processor. This ranking stems from the GPU's mid-range positioning (58th percentile among all GPUs) rather than the CPU's strength (92nd percentile among all CPUs). The measured FPS across all resolutions and settings reveals a system that can handle 1080p gaming comfortably but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K with higher quality presets.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The processor includes 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for simulation workloads that often benefit from large cache pools. Its benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22807 and a single-core score of 2228, indicating it can handle both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks effectively.

The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 41318 and single-thread score of 4704 place it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows the Ryzen 7 9850X3D sits within a tight performance cluster: it is 0.1% above the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (average score 58323), 0.5% above the Intel Core i9-14900 (58115), and 0.2% below the Intel Xeon w5-2545 (58504). These margins are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the processor's raw compute capability is competitive with other high-end desktop and workstation chips.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is less about rendering complex scenes and more about managing the simulation logic, physics calculations, and system state updates. The 8-core/16-thread configuration with 96 MB of L3 cache provides ample headroom for these tasks, and the high boost clock of 5.60 GHz ensures responsive single-threaded performance when the game needs to process user interface interactions or component placement. The PassMark physics score of 4171 and data compression score of 474501 further indicate strong computational throughput that should prevent CPU bottlenecks at most settings.

However, the measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in this game. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 205 FPS average, which far exceeds what most displays can show. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is clearly strained, the CPU still delivers 32 FPS average, suggesting the processor maintains enough performance to feed the GPU without dropping frames due to simulation stalls. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D's DDR5 memory support with dual-channel bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s also ensures data can flow quickly between the CPU and system memory, which is important for a game that simulates component interactions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a Turing architecture GPU (chip TU106) manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process. It comes with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1365 MHz and boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It includes 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads.

The RTX 2060's benchmark scores show it performs at the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 14111 and an average benchmark score of 15290. Its nearest rivals reveal an interesting competitive landscape: it is statistically tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (deltaPct 0.0), 0.1% above the AMD Radeon 680M (15270), 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199), and 0.8% above the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171). This clustering suggests the RTX 2060 delivers performance comparable to these cards despite being from an older generation, though the 6 GB VRAM capacity may become a constraint at higher resolutions.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU handles rendering of the simulation environment, including component models, lighting, and the overall workspace. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may struggle at 4K where texture memory demands increase. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 98 FPS average, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 32 FPS average. The GPU's pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s and texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s are adequate for the game's visuals, but the 6.451 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits how many effects and high-resolution textures can be rendered simultaneously.

The RTX 2060's directx 12 benchmark score of 53 (PassMark) suggests it handles modern API workloads reasonably well, which is relevant since Pc Building Simulator likely uses DirectX 11 or 12. The GPU's 30 RT cores are unused in this game, as Pc Building Simulator does not appear to employ ray-traced effects. Instead, the GPU's traditional rasterization performance determines the frame rate, and the data shows that at 1440p High, the system delivers 65 FPS average, which is playable but not exceptional for a simulation title where user interaction is frequent.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling across resolutions. Starting at 1080p Low with 205 FPS average, the system drops to 129 FPS at 1440p Low (a 37% decrease) and then to 68 FPS at 4K Low (a 47% decrease from 1440p). This scaling is steeper than what would be expected if the CPU were the bottleneck, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly constrained as pixel count rises.

At Medium settings, the progression is 145 FPS (1080p), 92 FPS (1440p), and 48 FPS (4K), with min/max values at 1080p ranging from 123 to 167 FPS and at 1440p from 78 to 105 FPS. The 4K Medium setting shows a min FPS of 41 and max of 55, suggesting noticeable frame-time variance even at this reduced quality level. The 1080p Medium data includes min/max (123-167) but the 4K Medium also has min/max (41-55), indicating that the GPU's workload at 4K causes more fluctuation than at lower resolutions.

High settings follow a similar trajectory: 102 FPS at 1080p, 65 FPS at 1440p, and 34 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 36%, and from 1440p to 4K is 48%, showing that the GPU scales poorly as resolution increases. Ultra settings demonstrate the most severe scaling: 98 FPS at 1080p, 62 FPS at 1440p, and 32 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 32 FPS is below the generally accepted 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that this combination is not suitable for 4K gaming at maximum quality.

The resolution scaling analysis points to the GPU as the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong benchmark scores (92nd percentile) suggest it could drive higher frame rates if the GPU were faster, but the RTX 2060's 58th percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM create a bottleneck that becomes more pronounced at 1440p and 4K. At 1080p, the system maintains playable frame rates across all settings, but the gap between Low (205 FPS) and Ultra (98 FPS) shows that even at this resolution, GPU load significantly impacts performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Pc Building Simulator at 60 FPS in 4K?

A: No. The measured data shows that at 4K, the highest average FPS across any setting is 68 FPS at Low settings. Medium achieves 48 FPS, High achieves 34 FPS, and Ultra achieves 32 FPS. Only the 4K Low preset meets the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain high frame rates?

A: At 1080p, all settings deliver at least 98 FPS average, with Low reaching 205 FPS and Medium at 145 FPS. 1440p is also viable for Medium (92 FPS) and High (65 FPS), but Ultra at 1440p dips to 62 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in this system?

A: The RTX 2060 is effectively tied with the GTX 580 (0.0% delta), 0.1% above the Radeon 680M, 0.6% above the RTX 3050 OEM, and 0.8% above the RX 7600 in average benchmark scores. These differences are minimal, so swapping to any of these cards would produce similar performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9850X3D overkill for this GPU in this game?

A: The data suggests yes. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and high Cinebench scores (22807 multicore, 2228 single-core) far exceed what Pc Building Simulator requires, as frame rates are primarily limited by the GPU at higher resolutions and settings.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 92, with a minimum of 78 and maximum of 105. This provides a smooth experience with occasional dips, making it suitable for most players.

Q: Does the 6 GB VRAM on the RTX 2060 cause issues in this game?

A: The measured data shows playable performance at 1080p and 1440p across all settings, but 4K performance drops significantly. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 32, which likely reflects both VRAM capacity and compute limitations of the GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160 (4K), the system achieves 68 FPS average on Low settings, 48 FPS on Medium (with min 41 and max 55), 34 FPS on High, and 32 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show a clear progression: lowering settings from Ultra to Low more than doubles the average frame rate, from 32 to 68 FPS.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), performance improves substantially. Low settings yield 129 FPS average, Medium delivers 92 FPS (min 78, max 105), High produces 65 FPS, and Ultra reaches 62 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra at 1440p is minimal (3 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns from the Ultra preset's additional effects. The Medium setting at 1440p provides the best combination of fluidity and visual quality, with an average of 92 FPS and a minimum of 78 FPS that stays above most display refresh rates.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system shows its strongest performance. Low settings achieve 205 FPS average, Medium delivers 145 FPS (min 123, max 167), High produces 102 FPS, and Ultra reaches 98 FPS. The 1080p results indicate that even at Ultra, the system maintains near-100 FPS performance, which is smooth for most monitors. The Medium setting at 1080p offers a comfortable margin above 60 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS, ensuring consistent frame delivery.

Comparing across resolutions, the data shows that at Low settings, performance drops from 205 FPS (1080p) to 129 FPS (1440p) to 68 FPS (4K). At Medium, the drop is from 145 to 92 to 48 FPS. At High, from 102 to 65 to 34 FPS. At Ultra, from 98 to 62 to 32 FPS. The proportional drop from 1080p to 4K is consistent across settings, ranging from 67% at Low to 68% at Ultra, indicating that resolution scaling affects all quality presets similarly.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset delivers 98 FPS average, which is excellent for most users and provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. However, players with 144 Hz or higher refresh rate monitors might prefer the Medium preset at 145 FPS, which offers a significant frame rate boost while still maintaining good visuals.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering 92 FPS average with a minimum of 78 FPS. This combination provides a smooth experience that stays above 60 FPS even during demanding scenes. The High preset at 65 FPS is also viable for those prioritizing visual fidelity, but the Ultra preset at 62 FPS offers little additional benefit over High while requiring more GPU resources. The Low preset at 129 FPS is excessive for most displays but could suit competitive players seeking maximum responsiveness.

At 4K, the Low preset is the only settings level that achieves playable frame rates, with 68 FPS average. The Medium preset at 48 FPS is playable but may feel less responsive, while High (34 FPS) and Ultra (32 FPS) are likely too choppy for comfortable use. Players with 4K displays should either use Low settings or consider reducing the resolution to 1440p for better performance.

The data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the system delivers 145 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the 92 FPS average and 78 FPS minimum ensure smooth gameplay. At 4K Medium, the 48 FPS average is borderline but workable for less demanding players.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2352 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 78th percentile from the bottom (or 22nd percentile from the top). This ranking reflects the overall performance of the system across all tested configurations, and the data indicates that the GPU is the primary factor limiting this combo's position.

The CPU's strong benchmark performance (92nd percentile among all CPUs) does not translate to a high combo ranking because Pc Building Simulator is not CPU-intensive in a way that differentiates high-end processors. The GPU's 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs more directly correlates with the game's frame rate output, and the RTX 2060's position in the mid-range segment limits the combo to the lower third of tested configurations.

Compared to other combos that feature the RTX 2060, this system's performance is likely similar to those paired with mid-range CPUs, as the game's frame rates are GPU-bound at most settings. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D does not provide a meaningful advantage over less powerful CPUs in this title, as evidenced by the fact that the combo rank is determined more by the GPU than the processor. Players seeking higher combo rankings would benefit more from upgrading the GPU than the CPU, as the data shows the RTX 2060 is the limiting component at 1440p and 4K resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

VRAM 6 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1680 MHz MHz
TDP 160 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 68.0
3840x2160 Medium 48.0
3840x2160 High 34.0
3840x2160 Ultra 32.0
2560x1440 Low 129.0
2560x1440 Medium 92.0
2560x1440 High 65.0
2560x1440 Ultra 62.0
1920x1080 Low 205.0
1920x1080 Medium 145.0
1920x1080 High 102.0
1920x1080 Ultra 98.0

Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 2060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.