Pc Building Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 116 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 41 | 61 | 89 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 83 | 117 | 166 |
| 1080p Full HD | 125 | 131 | 189 | 269 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing in Pc Building Simulator delivers a balanced experience that hinges on the simulation's unique engine demands. The data shows a setup that can push well past 60 FPS at high settings in most scenarios, but with clear scaling patterns that reveal where each component's strengths lie. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to guide your settings and resolution choices.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. This is a 7 nm Vermeer chip running on the AM4 socket. For a simulation title like Pc Building Simulator, which manages complex physics and logic systems, the thread count is more important than raw single-core speed. The benchmark data supports this: the CPU scores 7299 in 3dmark_16_threads, which is nearly identical to its max-thread score of 7285, indicating that the game can utilize the full thread pool effectively. The 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a notable asset, providing ample fast memory for game logic and asset streaming.
The CPU's position among rivals confirms its mid-pack standing. It sits only 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 8024P and Intel Core i9-11900K, and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7600. This tight grouping means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 5800X3D is not giving up meaningful ground to newer platforms. The 16 threads are the key factor here; the game's ability to scale from 8 threads (5906 in 3dmark_8_threads) to 16 threads (7299) shows a 23.6% improvement, proving that the simulation logic benefits from the full thread count. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 884 is comparatively low, but this does not translate into poor game performance because the workload spreads across all cores.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
The measured FPS data at 1080p provides the clearest picture of settings scaling. At Low settings, the combo achieves 268.7 FPS, which is more than enough for any display. Medium settings drop this to 188.9 FPS, still far above the 144 Hz threshold. High settings deliver 131.3 FPS, and Ultra settles at 125.1 FPS. The performance gap between High and Ultra is minimal at only 4.7%, suggesting that the Ultra preset is not significantly more demanding than High in this title. However, the jump from Low to Medium is substantial: a 29.7% performance reduction for the visual uplift.
Based on the data, High settings at 1080p represent the sweet spot. It maintains a 131.3 FPS average, which is 5.0% faster than Ultra but still well within high-refresh territory. The difference between High and Ultra is small enough that either is viable, but High preserves more headroom for complex in-game scenes. For those prioritizing maximum smoothness, Medium at 188.9 FPS is the better choice, as it offers a 43.8% improvement over High. Low settings are unnecessary unless you are targeting extreme frame rates for competitive play, as the visual fidelity loss is not justified by the 104.8% FPS increase over Ultra.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The resolution scaling patterns reveal a strong CPU influence at lower resolutions, transitioning to GPU dominance at 4K. At High settings, the FPS drops from 131.3 at 1080p to 82.8 at 1440p (a 36.9% reduction), and then to 41.4 at 4K (a 50.0% reduction from 1440p). The 1080p-to-1440p drop is steeper than the pixel count change alone would suggest, indicating that the CPU is still partially limiting at 1080p. The 1440p-to-4K drop is more severe, showing that the RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus are becoming the primary constraint.
The Ultra settings tell a similar story: 125.1 FPS at 1080p, 82 FPS at 1440p, and 43.8 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 34.5%, and the 1440p to 4K drop is 46.6%. The RTX 4060, with its 272.0 GB/s bandwidth, is clearly the bottleneck at 4K. The 5800X3D has ample headroom at 4K, as evidenced by the fact that the FPS scales almost linearly with the GPU load. For 4K gaming, the data suggests that even Low settings (88.5 FPS) cannot maintain a consistent 60 FPS experience, making 1440p the practical ceiling for this combo.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
This specific combination of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and RTX 4060 ranks 1016 out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the 57.5th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of all tested configurations. The ranking is a reflection of the balanced nature of the pairing. The CPU, at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, is a strong performer, while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile. The combination of a high-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU creates a system that excels in CPU-heavy simulations but is held back in GPU-intensive rendering tasks.
The ranking relative to the total field suggests that this combo is well-suited for the game's core mechanics. The 5800X3D's 8-core/16-thread configuration is ideal for the simulation's logic, and the RTX 4060 provides enough graphics horsepower for smooth 1080p and 1440p play. The combo does not break into the top tier, but it avoids the pitfalls of a CPU or GPU bottleneck. For a simulation title where frame pacing is more important than peak FPS, this mid-pack placement is a positive indicator of consistent performance.
FAQ
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D sufficient for Pc Building Simulator's CPU demands?
A: Yes. The CPU's 16 threads provide a 23.6% performance increase over its 8-thread score, and it ranks at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded scaling that matches the game's simulation logic.
Q: Can the RTX 4060 handle 4K gaming in this title?
A: No, not at playable frame rates. The highest 4K average is 88.5 FPS at Low settings, but High and Ultra drop to 41.4 and 43.8 FPS respectively, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 144 Hz monitor?
A: Medium settings at 1080p, delivering 188.9 FPS, or High settings at 131.3 FPS. Both exceed 144 Hz, but Medium offers a 43.8% FPS advantage over High if you want maximum headroom.
Q: How does this combo compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7600?
A: The 5800X3D scores 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 7600 in average benchmark scores. This is a negligible difference, making the two CPUs effectively interchangeable for this game's performance.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1440p High settings?
A: The data shows a 36.9% FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p at High settings. This indicates the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck, as the CPU has enough headroom to handle the increased resolution.
Q: Does Ultra settings provide a meaningful improvement over High?
A: At 1080p, Ultra is only 4.7% slower than High (125.1 vs 131.3 FPS). The visual uplift is minimal for the performance cost, making High the more efficient choice.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
1920x1080 (1080p)
- Low: 268.7 FPS average
- Medium: 188.9 FPS average
- High: 131.3 FPS average
- Ultra: 125.1 FPS average
2560x1440 (1440p)
- Low: 166.4 FPS average
- Medium: 116.9 FPS average
- High: 82.8 FPS average
- Ultra: 82 FPS average
3840x2160 (4K)
- Low: 88.5 FPS average
- Medium: 60.7 FPS average
- High: 41.4 FPS average
- Ultra: 43.8 FPS average
The data reveals a consistent pattern: 1080p is fully playable at all settings, 1440p is playable up to High settings, and 4K is only viable at Low settings. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p is significant (29.2% FPS drop), while the High to Ultra transition at 1440p is negligible (0.98% difference). At 4K, the Medium setting at 60.7 FPS is right at the edge of playability, while High and Ultra fall below 45 FPS. This breakdown confirms that the RTX 4060's 8 GB memory capacity and bandwidth are the primary constraints at higher resolutions, while the 5800X3D's strong thread scaling keeps 1080p performance consistently high.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 88.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 60.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 43.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 41.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 166.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 116.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 82.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 82.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 268.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 188.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 131.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 125.1 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.