Pc Building Simulator

FAQ

Q: What is the combo rank of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Pc Building Simulator?

A: This combination ranks 358th out of 3,723 tested combos in the database for this game, placing it in the top 10% of all tested configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25,517 on average, which is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25,530, delta -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (25,550, delta -0.1%). It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25,485) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25,446).

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER in average GPU benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 54,247 on average, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209, meaning the standard 4080 is 0.1% ahead of the SUPER variant in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the best average FPS achieved at 4K resolution with this combo?

A: At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the combo achieves 155 FPS average, which is the highest 4K result. The lowest 4K result is 74 FPS at Ultra settings.

Q: What is the largest FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings?

A: At Low settings, the drop is from 332 FPS at 1080p to 155 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 177 FPS. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 224 FPS to 74 FPS, a reduction of 150 FPS.

Q: Does the combo data include minimum or maximum FPS readings for all settings?

A: No. Only the Medium settings at each resolution include min and max FPS values. All other settings rows list only average FPS.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this pairing for Pc Building Simulator, given its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock runs at 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz, and its memory operates at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). These specifications position the RTX 4080 in the 86th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 54,247.

The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores nearly identically (54,209, delta 0.1%), which suggests that in this game, the standard 4080 is effectively at parity with its SUPER successor. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (delta -1.1%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (delta -2.6%), meaning the 4080 trails those two by a small margin in raw aggregate benchmarks.

The RTX 4080's 16 GB frame buffer is well above what a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator would need at any tested resolution, so VRAM capacity is unlikely to be a limiting factor. The 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate provide substantial headroom for rendering physics-based simulations and UI-heavy scenes typical of the genre. The GPU's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are present but likely underutilized in this title, which does not appear to stress ray tracing based on the benchmark pattern.

The GPU's role becomes more apparent when examining the FPS scaling: at 4K Ultra, the combo still produces 74 FPS, and at 4K High it reaches 78 FPS. These results indicate the RTX 4080 is doing the heavy lifting at higher resolutions, while the CPU takes a larger share of the workload at 1080p where frame rates exceed 300 FPS. The GPU's 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design suggest it is a high-end part that can sustain these frame rates without thermal throttling, though the data does not include temperature readings.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution scaling that points to the RTX 4080 as the primary bottleneck at 4K, with the Ryzen 7 5700 becoming more relevant at lower resolutions. At Low settings, the combo delivers 332 FPS at 1920x1080, dropping to 285 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 155 FPS at 3840x2160. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is 14.2%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 45.6%, showing a steeper decline as pixel count increases.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is similar but with lower absolute numbers: 224 FPS at 1080p, 141 FPS at 1440p (a 37.1% drop), and 74 FPS at 4K (a 47.5% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these drops across settings suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K regardless of quality preset, since the frame rate decline tracks with the 4x pixel count increase from 1080p to 4K more closely than with the 2.25x increase from 1080p to 1440p.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (332 FPS) and Ultra (224 FPS) is 108 FPS, or a 32.5% reduction. At 4K, the difference between Low (155 FPS) and Ultra (74 FPS) is 81 FPS, or a 52.3% reduction. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily loaded that the quality settings have a proportionally larger impact on frame rate, whereas at 1080p the CPU can help maintain higher minimums even with more demanding settings.

The Medium settings rows include min and max FPS values that provide additional insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the combo ranges from 248 to 335 FPS with an average of 292 FPS, showing a spread of 87 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 179 to 242 FPS with an average of 210 FPS, a spread of 63 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range narrows to 93 to 126 FPS with an average of 110 FPS, a spread of only 33 FPS. The narrowing spread at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU becomes the consistent bottleneck, reducing frame time variance compared to lower resolutions where CPU scheduling and game logic can cause larger swings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings yield 332 FPS average, Medium yields 292 FPS (with min 248 and max 335), High yields 235 FPS, and Ultra yields 224 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 32.5% total reduction in frame rate. The gap between High and Ultra is notably small at only 11 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds visual features that cost relatively little performance at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a more pronounced settings sensitivity. Low delivers 285 FPS, Medium delivers 210 FPS (min 179, max 242), High delivers 148 FPS, and Ultra delivers 141 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 50.5%, which is steeper than the 1080p drop. The Medium to High gap (62 FPS) is larger than the High to Ultra gap (7 FPS), indicating that the High preset is close to Ultra in performance cost at 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates fall into a range that is still playable but far from the high refresh rates seen at lower resolutions. Low settings produce 155 FPS average, Medium produces 110 FPS (min 93, max 126), High produces 78 FPS, and Ultra produces 74 FPS. The Low to Medium drop is 45 FPS, Medium to High is 32 FPS, and High to Ultra is only 4 FPS. This final 4 FPS difference suggests that the Ultra preset at 4K adds negligible visual improvements over High for this game, or that the GPU is already saturated at High settings.

The Medium settings at each resolution are the only rows with complete min/max data. The min FPS values at 4K Medium (93 FPS) is still above 60 FPS, which is a typical target for smooth gameplay. At 1440p Medium, the min of 179 FPS is well above any display refresh rate under 170 Hz. At 1080p Medium, the min of 248 FPS exceeds all but the most extreme gaming monitors.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combo ranks 358th out of 3,723 tested configurations in Pc Building Simulator, putting it in the top 9.6% of all combos in the database. This rank reflects the combination's ability to handle the game's simulation workloads and rendering demands simultaneously.

The CPU component of this combo sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,517. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% delta, meaning the Ryzen 7 5700 is at the center of a tight cluster of similarly performing processors. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25,530, -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (25,550, -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25,485, +0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25,446, +0.3%) all perform within statistical noise of each other.

The GPU component ranks in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, is effectively identical in performance (54,209, +0.1% for the standard 4080). The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828, -1.1%) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, -2.6%) both score higher, meaning the 4080 is slightly behind those parts in aggregate benchmarks.

The combination of a mid-80th percentile GPU with a high-70th percentile CPU yields a top-10% combo rank for this specific game. The rank is likely higher than the individual component percentiles would suggest because Pc Building Simulator is not an extremely demanding title, so the RTX 4080's raw power is more than sufficient, and the Ryzen 7 5700's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample processing for the game's simulation logic. The 16 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU support efficient data handling during build simulations.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver 224 FPS average, which is well above any current display refresh rate. There is no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset maintains frame rates that exceed 200 FPS. The small 11 FPS gap between High and Ultra further supports using Ultra.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings produce 141 FPS average, which is suitable for high refresh rate monitors in the 144 Hz class. The drop to High (148 FPS) is a marginal 7 FPS improvement, so Ultra is the recommended choice for visual fidelity. For gamers targeting 165 Hz or higher, dropping to Medium (210 FPS) provides a significant frame rate boost, but the data shows that High and Ultra are nearly identical in performance, making High a poor middle ground.

At 3840x2160, the recommendation becomes more nuanced. Ultra settings yield 74 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay but not ideal for high refresh rate displays. High settings (78 FPS) offer only a 4 FPS improvement, so Ultra is still viable. Medium settings (110 FPS) provide a substantial uplift and are the best choice for 4K displays with 120 Hz refresh rates. Low settings (155 FPS) are only necessary for 4K displays at 144 Hz or higher, but the visual compromise is substantial.

For the best overall experience, the Medium preset at 4K offers the most balanced performance, with a minimum FPS of 93 that keeps the experience smooth even in demanding scenes. At lower resolutions, Ultra is the clear winner because the GPU has ample headroom. The data shows that this combo is never CPU-bound at any tested setting, as even the lowest frame rate (74 FPS at 4K Ultra) is well above what a CPU bottleneck would typically produce in a simulation game.