Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
134
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 134 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 53 72 101
1440p QHD 94 98 136 194
1080p Full HD 147 154 211 301

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 101
3840x2160 Medium 72
3840x2160 High 53
3840x2160 Ultra 48
2560x1440 Low 194
2560x1440 Medium 136
2560x1440 High 98
2560x1440 Ultra 94
1920x1080 Low 301
1920x1080 Medium 211
1920x1080 High 154
1920x1080 Ultra 147

Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that tasks players with assembling and benchmarking virtual PCs, so its performance profile is distinctly different from typical shooters or action games. The data for this configuration, pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, shows a system that is heavily front-loaded on CPU performance, which creates a unique scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. This analysis will break down the measured FPS data, contextualize the combo's rank, and explain what the numbers indicate about the limiting components within this specific game.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it carries a 65 W TDP. The CPU's benchmark results indicate strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25525 and a single-core score of 3603. This places the chip in the 85th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28246.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is central because the game's core loop is about managing components, running diagnostic tools, and observing benchmark outputs. The data suggests this title is exceptionally sensitive to CPU throughput. The 9600X's high boost clock and efficient Zen 5 architecture likely contribute to its ability to push frame rates to very high levels, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The processor's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support provide the bandwidth necessary for the simulation's logic, which involves tracking many system variables simultaneously. The nearest rivals for this CPU—the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Ryzen 5 230—are within a 0.3% margin of its average score, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Intel Core i5-14500T trail by 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively. This tight grouping indicates that the 9600X is performing exactly in line with expectations for its class, but the game's reliance on CPU speed is what allows it to excel.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

Within the benchmark database for Pc Building Simulator, this specific combination of the Ryzen 5 9600X and RTX 3070 holds a rank of 781 out of 1769 tested combos. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, which is surprising given the strength of the individual components. The rank suggests that while the CPU and GPU are both capable, the game's performance is being limited by a factor that is not entirely dependent on raw component strength. The RTX 3070 itself is an Ampere-architecture GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit memory bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its average benchmark score of 28238 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, being 0.9% behind.

The combo rank of 781 indicates that many other pairings, likely those with higher-end GPUs or more powerful CPUs, achieve better results in this specific simulation. The data implies that the RTX 3070, while a solid performer, may not be the optimal partner for the 9600X in this context. The GPU's nearest rivals—the AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X—are within a 1.1% margin of its average score, but the RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM could be a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with demanding settings. The benchmark results indicate that the combo's performance is good, but not top-tier, suggesting that a more balanced pairing or a stronger GPU would yield a better rank.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern in how the system scales from 1080p to 4K, and this scaling is the key to understanding the bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 301.2 FPS, which is an exceptionally high frame rate that only a very strong CPU can drive. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU is the primary driver of performance, and the RTX 3070 is not being fully utilized. As the resolution increases, the GPU becomes more involved, and the frame rate drops accordingly.

At 1440p Low, the frame rate drops to 194.1 FPS, a reduction of approximately 35.6% from 1080p. Moving to 4K Low, the frame rate falls to 100.5 FPS, a further drop of 48.2% from the 1440p figure. This steep decline as resolution increases confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The data shows that the system is CPU-bound at 1080p, where the 9600X's strong single-threaded performance can push frame rates beyond 300 FPS, but transitions to being GPU-bound at 4K, where the RTX 3070's 8 GB of memory and memory bandwidth become the bottleneck. The pattern is consistent across all settings, with the gap between 1080p and 4K widening as the preset quality increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 154.1 FPS on High, 211.4 FPS on Medium, 301.2 FPS on Low, and 147 FPS on Ultra. The jump from Low to Medium is a 29.8% decrease, while moving from Medium to High results in a further 27.1% drop. The Ultra preset is only 4.6% slower than High, indicating that the GPU is beginning to saturate at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the performance is still very strong but shows a more pronounced GPU influence. The system achieves 98 FPS on High, 136.4 FPS on Medium, 194.1 FPS on Low, and 93.5 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant: High settings see a 36.4% reduction, Medium sees a 35.5% reduction, Low sees a 35.6% reduction, and Ultra sees a 36.4% reduction. This consistency across settings indicates that the scaling is resolution-driven rather than settings-driven.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly GPU-bound. The frame rates are 52.6 FPS on High, 72.3 FPS on Medium, 100.5 FPS on Low, and 48.1 FPS on Ultra. The transition from 1440p to 4K is severe: High settings drop by 46.3%, Medium by 47.0%, Low by 48.2%, and Ultra by 48.6%. This substantial reduction at 4K highlights the RTX 3070's limitations, particularly with the Ultra preset, which falls below 50 FPS and is unlikely to provide a smooth experience. The data shows that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can maintain high frame rates, but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with higher settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 offers the highest frame rates, with the Low preset reaching 301.2 FPS and the Ultra preset still maintaining 147 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system remains capable, with the Ultra preset delivering 93.5 FPS, which is still smooth. The 3840x2160 resolution is the weakest, with the Ultra preset dropping to 48.1 FPS.

Q: Is the system CPU-bound or GPU-bound in this game?

A: The data indicates a shift in bottleneck. At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, up to 301.2 FPS on Low, which suggests the CPU is the primary driver. At 4K, the frame rates drop dramatically, with the Ultra preset falling to 48.1 FPS, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9600X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 28246, which is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Ryzen 5 230. It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 194.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 93.5 FPS. This represents a 51.8% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.

Q: Does the RTX 3070 perform well relative to other GPUs?

A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 28238, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra setting playable with this hardware?

A: The measured data shows the 4K Ultra preset delivers an average of 48.1 FPS. This is below the typical 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, suggesting that the setting is not ideal for a consistent experience.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows indicate that the best experience for this hardware depends on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 147 FPS, which is a strong result, but the High preset at 154.1 FPS is nearly identical, offering a negligible difference in frame rate. The Medium preset at 211.4 FPS is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it provides a massive frame rate boost with a moderate visual quality trade-off. The Low preset at 301.2 FPS is excessive for most displays and is only recommended for competitive play where frame rate is the absolute priority.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 98 FPS is a solid choice for a smooth gaming experience, while the Ultra preset at 93.5 FPS is also viable, with only a 4.6% drop in performance. The Medium preset at 136.4 FPS is ideal for users with 144 Hz monitors, as it clears the refresh rate threshold with headroom to spare. The Low preset at 194.1 FPS is again overkill but demonstrates the system's CPU strength. At 3840x2160, the High preset at 52.6 FPS is the best balance, as the Ultra preset at 48.1 FPS falls below the playable threshold for many users. The Medium preset at 72.3 FPS is the recommended choice for 4K, as it provides a playable frame rate while maintaining a reasonable level of visual fidelity. The Low preset at 100.5 FPS is the only settings level that offers a truly smooth 4K experience, but it compromises the visual quality that the resolution is meant to provide.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1725 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 100.5
3840x2160 Medium 72.3
3840x2160 High 52.6
3840x2160 Ultra 48.1
2560x1440 Low 194.1
2560x1440 Medium 136.4
2560x1440 High 98.0
2560x1440 Ultra 93.5
1920x1080 Low 301.2
1920x1080 Medium 211.4
1920x1080 High 154.1
1920x1080 Ultra 147.0

Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 3070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.