Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
109
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 109 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 41 58 82
1440p QHD 74 78 111 156
1080p Full HD 118 124 175 247

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 82
3840x2160 Medium 58
3840x2160 High 41
3840x2160 Ultra 39
2560x1440 Low 156
2560x1440 Medium 111
2560x1440 High 78
2560x1440 Ultra 74
1920x1080 Low 247
1920x1080 Medium 175
1920x1080 High 124
1920x1080 Ultra 118

Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination delivers a distinctive performance profile in Pc Building Simulator, placing this pairing in the 1710th position out of 3002 tested combos. This places the combo in the lower-middle tier of the database, a rank that reflects the specific demands of this simulation title.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.10 GHz, figures that directly influence how the CPU handles the simulation workloads in Pc Building Simulator. The processor operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This configuration supports the game's simulation logic, which involves tracking numerous components and system states simultaneously. The 12 threads allow for parallel processing of game systems, and the 5.10 GHz boost clock provides the single-thread responsiveness that simulation games often favor.

Benchmark data shows the CPU's capabilities across various workloads. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 12,735 in multi-core and 1,852 in single-core tests. The Geekbench results are similarly robust: 13,413 multi-core and 2,521 single-core. The PassMark multithread score reaches 27,058, while the single-thread score is 3,910. These numbers indicate a balanced processor that can handle both the multi-threaded simulation aspects and the single-threaded UI interactions within Pc Building Simulator.

The 3DMark results reveal scaling behavior: 1,938 for 2 threads, 3,686 for 4 threads, 5,508 for 8 threads, and 6,499 for 16 threads. The close scores between the 8-thread (5,508) and 16-thread (6,499) results suggest diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, which is relevant for a game that may not fully utilize all 12 threads. The maximum threads score of 6,503 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, confirming this plateau.

The CPU sits in the 78th percentile of all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 26,324. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26,274 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26,402 (0.3% ahead), the Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26,212 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26,187 (0.5% behind). This clustering indicates the 7600 is mid-pack among comparable CPUs.

For Pc Building Simulator specifically, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU in many scenarios, but the measured FPS data suggests that at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and 32 MB L3 cache help maintain high frame rates. The game's simulation nature means that even simple scenes can tax the CPU when many components are being tracked, and the 6-core/12-thread layout provides a solid foundation for these computations.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 achieves a rank of 1710 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the pairing in the 57th percentile of all combinations, meaning roughly 43% of tested combos perform worse while 57% perform better. This is a moderate ranking that reflects the GPU's position in the market more than the CPU's.

The GPU itself sits in the 59th percentile of all tested graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 16,014. Its nearest rivals show interesting comparisons: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15,862 (1% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15,852 (1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15,679 (2.1% lower). The RX 9060 is essentially neck-and-neck with the RTX 3060 Ti, while holding a slight edge over the R9 370X and RX 7700.

The combo's rank suggests that in Pc Building Simulator, this pairing delivers playable performance at most settings, but it is not among the top-tier configurations. The data indicates that the GPU is the more significant contributor to the combo's ranking, as the CPU's high percentile (78th) does not translate into a proportionally high combo rank. This discrepancy suggests that the game's performance is more dependent on graphics processing than on CPU compute.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing sits in a crowded middle ground. The deltaPct values for the GPU's rivals are small, ranging from -0.7% to 2.1%, indicating that many GPUs in this performance class will yield similar combo rankings. The CPU's rivals also cluster closely, with deltaPct values from -0.3% to 0.5%. This tight grouping means that swapping either component for a near-rival would likely change the combo rank by only a small margin.

The measured FPS data supports this middle-tier positioning. At 1080p Ultra, the combo delivers 118 FPS, which is smooth but not exceptional for a simulation game. The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is at the edge of playability, confirming that this combo is not designed for maximum settings at high resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The combo delivers an average of 175 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600 compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26,324, while the Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26,402, making the 7435HS 0.3% faster on average.

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?

A: At 3840x2160 with High settings, the combo achieves 41 FPS, and with Low settings it reaches 82 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 39 FPS, which is below the typically desired 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile compared to all tested GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is in the 59th percentile of all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16,014.

Q: How much faster is the lowest FPS setting compared to the highest at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low setting averages 156 FPS, while the Ultra setting averages 74 FPS. This represents a 2.1x difference between the two extremes.

Q: What is the CPU's rank percentile and average score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 is in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,324.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings tiers. At 1920x1080, the combo shows strong performance across all settings. The Low preset delivers an average of 247 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates the CPU and GPU are not heavily taxed at this setting. Medium settings reduce the average to 175 FPS, with a minimum of 149 and maximum of 201 FPS, showing some variance in frame times. High settings produce 124 FPS average, while Ultra settings yield 118 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is only 6 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns from the highest preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings average 156 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings drop to 111 FPS, with a minimum of 94 and maximum of 127 FPS. High settings produce 78 FPS, and Ultra settings average 74 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra narrows to just 4 FPS at this resolution, indicating that the Ultra preset's additional effects have minimal impact on this hardware.

At 3840x2160, the combo begins to struggle with higher settings. Low settings still manage an average of 82 FPS, which is acceptable for most players. Medium settings drop to 58 FPS, with a minimum of 49 and maximum of 66 FPS, showing noticeable frame time variation. High settings reduce the average to 41 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 39 FPS. The 4K results clearly show that this combo is not suited for maximum settings at this resolution, as both High and Ultra fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

The data reveals a consistent pattern across resolutions: the difference between Low and Medium is substantial, while the difference between High and Ultra is minimal. At 1080p, Low averages 247 FPS while Medium averages 175 FPS, a 72 FPS drop. High averages 124 FPS while Ultra averages 118 FPS, only a 6 FPS drop. This pattern holds at 1440p (156 to 111 FPS is a 45 FPS drop, while 78 to 74 FPS is a 4 FPS drop) and at 4K (82 to 58 FPS is a 24 FPS drop, while 41 to 39 FPS is a 2 FPS drop).

The minimum and maximum FPS data only exists for Medium settings, providing insight into frame consistency. At 1080p Medium, the range is 149 to 201 FPS, a 52 FPS spread. At 1440p Medium, the range is 94 to 127 FPS, a 33 FPS spread. At 4K Medium, the range is 49 to 66 FPS, a 17 FPS spread. This narrowing range at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU becomes the limiting factor, reducing the variance in frame times.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a Radeon RX 9000 series GPU built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip and Strix Point codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, containing 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The GPU features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores.

Clock speeds are notable: the base clock runs at 1700 MHz, the game clock at 2400 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2990 MHz. The memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for Pc Building Simulator, which does not appear to require massive VRAM allocations based on the measured FPS data.

The GPU's compute capabilities include 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance (1:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s. The TDP is rated at 132 W, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 300 W PSU. The card occupies a dual-slot form factor and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Benchmark scores show the GPU's general performance: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 3,322, Geekbench OpenCL scores 88,183, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 39,476. PassMark tests show G3D at 17,631, G2D at 1,002, and GPU compute at 9,919. The DirectX-specific tests are lower, with DirectX 10 at 104, DirectX 11 at 182, DirectX 12 at 44, and DirectX 9 at 280.

The GPU's percentile rank of 59 places it slightly above the median of all tested GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 16,014 positions it within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16,129), and ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862) and AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15,852) by 1% each. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails at 15,679, which is 2.1% behind.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role becomes more prominent as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU appears capable of feeding the GPU sufficiently, but at 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become limiting factors. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the game's demands at lower settings, but the 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 118 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience. The High preset at 124 FPS offers only a 6 FPS improvement over Ultra, so the visual quality gain from Ultra is essentially free at this resolution. For players seeking maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 247 FPS offers an extremely responsive experience, but the visual trade-off is likely not worth it for a simulation game where readability is important.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 111 FPS provides the best balance. The High preset at 78 FPS is still playable, but the 33 FPS difference between Medium and High is substantial. The Ultra preset at 74 FPS is nearly identical to High (only 4 FPS difference), so Ultra is the better choice if the player wants maximum visual quality without sacrificing much performance. However, the Medium preset's 111 FPS average with a 94 FPS minimum ensures that frame drops stay above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the safest choice for consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. The Low preset at 82 FPS is the only setting that reliably exceeds 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 58 FPS is borderline, with a minimum of 49 FPS that could cause noticeable stuttering. Both High (41 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) fall well below the 60 FPS threshold and are not recommended for a smooth experience. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is the only viable option, while Medium may be acceptable for players who prioritize visual quality over frame rate consistency.

The data suggests that the Medium preset provides the best overall experience across all resolutions. At 1080p, it delivers 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS, ensuring no drops below the 60 FPS threshold. At 1440p, it delivers 111 FPS with a minimum of 94 FPS. At 4K, it delivers 58 FPS with a minimum of 49 FPS, which is borderline but still playable. The Medium preset's performance consistency, as evidenced by the available minimum and maximum FPS data, makes it the most predictable choice for this hardware combination.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS scaling across resolutions reveals important information about which component limits performance in Pc Building Simulator. At the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 247 at 1080p to 156 at 1440p, a 37% reduction, and then to 82 at 4K, a 47% reduction from 1440p. This scaling pattern suggests that at Low settings, the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as the limiting factor, since the CPU has less graphics work to do and can maintain high frame rates.

At the Medium preset, the scaling is similar but slightly less steep. The average drops from 175 at 1080p to 111 at 1440p (37% reduction) and then to 58 at 4K (48% reduction from 1440p). This consistent scaling pattern across Low and Medium settings indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at all resolutions, with the CPU having sufficient headroom to feed the GPU even at 1080p.

The High preset shows a different scaling profile. The average drops from 124 at 1080p to 78 at 1440p (37% reduction) and then to 41 at 4K (47% reduction from 1440p). This pattern is nearly identical to the Low and Medium settings, reinforcing the GPU-limited nature of the combo. The Ultra preset follows the same trend: 118 at 1080p, 74 at 1440p (37% reduction), and 39 at 4K (47% reduction from 1440p).

The consistent percentage reductions across all settings presets strongly indicate that the GPU is the limiting component throughout the resolution range. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see smaller FPS drops at higher resolutions (since the CPU work stays constant) or larger drops at lower resolutions (where the CPU must feed more frames). Neither pattern appears in the data.

The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus contribute to this bottleneck. At 4K, the higher memory pressure and increased pixel throughput demand more from the GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, which appears insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at higher settings. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (3,910 in PassMark, 1,852 in Cinebench R23) suggest it is never the limiting factor, even at 1080p Low where the GPU is producing 247 FPS.

This analysis indicates that players looking to improve performance in Pc Building Simulator should focus on GPU upgrades rather than CPU upgrades. The Ryzen 5 7600 is more than capable of supporting this game, and the RX 9060's mid-tier positioning is the primary constraint on frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and settings.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2990 MHz MHz
TDP 132 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 82.0
3840x2160 Medium 58.0
3840x2160 High 41.0
3840x2160 Ultra 39.0
2560x1440 Low 156.0
2560x1440 Medium 111.0
2560x1440 High 78.0
2560x1440 Ultra 74.0
1920x1080 Low 247.0
1920x1080 Medium 175.0
1920x1080 High 124.0
1920x1080 Ultra 118.0

Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Pc Building Simulator with RX 9060 + Other CPUs

See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + RX 9060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.