Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title where the rendering load is modest by modern standards, and the measured frame rates for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination reflect that. The data shows a system that is capable of very high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being the only resolution where the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS threshold on higher presets. This pairing of a six-core, twelve-thread CPU with an 8 GB graphics card produces a balanced profile, though the benchmark results reveal that the GPU becomes the primary scaling factor as resolution increases.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is built on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.60 GHz, which provides strong single-thread performance for a simulation game that often relies on consistent frame pacing. The processor’s 32 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient for this genre, where the simulation logic does not typically scale with the thread counts of higher-end workstation chips.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5600X achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18578 and a single-core score of 2622. These numbers indicate that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions in Pc Building Simulator. The measured FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings is 266 FPS, which is a strong indicator that the processor can feed frames quickly. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 20680 places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT, which scores 20740 (a delta of -0.3%), and the Intel Core i7-10700, also scoring 20746 (a delta of -0.3%). This close grouping shows that the 5600X is competitively positioned but not an outlier in raw compute.

For Pc Building Simulator specifically, the CPU’s role is to manage the game’s underlying simulation state, which includes component compatibility checks and system configuration logic. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5582 and the PassMark multithread score of 21858 suggest that the 12 threads are adequately utilized, but the game does not appear to demand more than what this chip offers. The single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 917 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3364, is more relevant here, as simulation steps are often serialized. The data shows no significant frame rate drop from 1080p to 1440p that would implicate the CPU, with the 1080p Ultra average of 129.5 FPS and the 1440p Ultra average of 81.5 FPS, indicating the GPU is starting to take over the workload.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for Pc Building Simulator, which does not feature high-resolution textures or complex shaders that would exhaust the VRAM capacity. The GPU’s 3072 shading units and 48 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s, which is sufficient for the game’s relatively simple visual output.

In the measured FPS data, the RTX 4060 shows clear scaling with settings. At 1080p, the average frame rate moves from 266 FPS on Low to 191.5 on Medium, 130.6 on High, and 129.5 on Ultra. This pattern indicates that the GPU is not severely taxed at 1080p, and the performance headroom is large. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23181, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which scores 23321 (a delta of -0.6%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti, scoring 23338 (a delta of -0.7%). The RTX 4060 is slightly below these rivals in synthetic tests but performs competitively in this game.

The GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 4K, the average frame rate on Ultra drops to 39.7 FPS, which is a substantial reduction from the 129.5 FPS seen at 1080p on the same settings. This drop is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors. The RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are modest for 4K gaming, and the data reflects that, with the 4K High preset at 41.8 FPS and 4K Medium at 59.8 FPS. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and PassMark G3D score of 19545 provide context for its overall capability, but in Pc Building Simulator, the performance is more dependent on resolution and preset than on raw compute.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data shows a clear trend of diminishing performance as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average frame rate on Ultra settings drops from 129.5 FPS to 81.5 FPS, a reduction of approximately 37%. Moving from 1440p to 3840x2160 on Ultra, the frame rate falls further to 39.7 FPS, a drop of about 51% from the 1440p figure. This progressive decline is steeper than what would be expected from a CPU bottleneck, as the CPU’s workload does not change significantly with resolution.

On Low settings, the scaling is even more dramatic, highlighting the GPU’s limits. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 266 FPS, which is extremely high and suggests that the CPU is capable of pushing frames well beyond typical display refresh rates. At 1440p Low, the average drops to 167.8 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 89.9 FPS. This pattern indicates that even at the lowest settings, the RTX 4060 cannot maintain the same frame rates at higher resolutions due to the increased pixel count. The difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low is a 66% reduction in FPS, which is a substantial penalty.

The data suggests that the RTX 4060 is the limiting component at resolutions above 1080p. At 1080p, the CPU and GPU are well balanced, with the system capable of exceeding 130 FPS on all presets except the most demanding, where it still stays above 129 FPS. At 1440p, the system remains playable on all presets, with the lowest average being 81.5 FPS on Ultra. At 4K, however, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the frame rates on High and Ultra presets fall below 60 FPS, and even Medium only reaches 59.8 FPS. The 4K Low preset at 89.9 FPS shows that the GPU can still handle the resolution when graphical load is minimized, but the scaling is not linear, confirming that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are the key constraints.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset at 130.6 FPS and the Ultra preset at 129.5 FPS are nearly identical, with only a 1.1 FPS difference. This suggests that players can enable Ultra settings without a meaningful performance penalty, as the GPU has sufficient headroom. The Medium preset at 191.5 FPS is also an option for those seeking higher frame rates, but the jump from High to Medium is substantial, and the visual quality difference in a simulation game may not justify the extra FPS.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 84.5 FPS provides a smooth experience, while the Ultra preset at 81.5 FPS is only 3 FPS lower. The Medium preset at 117.6 FPS offers a significant boost in frame rate, making it a good choice for players with 144Hz monitors who want to avoid any potential dips. The Low preset at 167.8 FPS is excessively high for most displays and would not provide a better visual experience. For 1440p, the High preset is recommended as the best balance, as it stays above 60 FPS with room to spare.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. The Medium preset at 59.8 FPS is just below the 60 FPS target, while the High preset at 41.8 FPS and Ultra at 39.7 FPS are not ideal for smooth gameplay. The Low preset at 89.9 FPS is the only 4K option that exceeds 60 FPS, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. For 4K, the Medium preset is the best choice, as it provides near-60 FPS performance without the visual downgrade of Low settings. The data shows that the High preset at 4K is only 2.1 FPS faster than Ultra, so there is no advantage to choosing High over Ultra in this case.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The highest measured average frame rate is 266 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: At 4K, the Medium preset yields an average of 59.8 FPS, which is just below 60 FPS. The Low preset achieves 89.9 FPS, while High and Ultra presets drop to 41.8 FPS and 39.7 FPS, respectively.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600X compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600X has an average benchmark score of 20680, which is -0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT (20740) and the Intel Core i7-10700 (20746), and -0.5% lower than the Intel Core i5-12490F (20794).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 23181.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between High and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the High preset averages 130.6 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 129.5 FPS, a difference of only 1.1 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as evidenced by the frame rate drop from 167.8 FPS on Low to 81.5 FPS on Ultra, while the CPU’s performance remains consistent.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 266 FPS on Low, 191.5 FPS on Medium, 130.6 FPS on High, and 129.5 FPS on Ultra. These figures show a steep drop from Low to Medium, followed by a more gradual decline to High and Ultra. The system is capable of exceeding 130 FPS on all presets at this resolution, making it well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 167.8 FPS on Low, 117.6 FPS on Medium, 84.5 FPS on High, and 81.5 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Medium is a 30% reduction, while the drop from Medium to High is 28%, and from High to Ultra is only 3.6%. This indicates that the Ultra preset offers minimal visual improvement over High at a slight performance cost. The 1440p results are all above 80 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience regardless of settings.

At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 89.9 FPS on Low, 59.8 FPS on Medium, 41.8 FPS on High, and 39.7 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Medium is 33%, and the decline continues sharply to High and Ultra. Only the Low and Medium presets provide acceptable performance for 4K, with the High and Ultra presets falling well below 60 FPS. The data shows that the RTX 4060 is not designed for 4K gaming, as the frame rates on higher presets are too low for a fluid experience. The overall combo rank in game is 1010 out of 1769 combinations, which places this system in the upper half of tested configurations.