Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that tasks players with assembling and configuring systems, and the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti reveals a combination that is heavily weighted toward the graphics card. The measured results show a pattern where frame rates scale directly with resolution, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver of performance across all tested settings. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread part from the 2000 series, provides sufficient throughput for the game’s logic, but the data suggests that its influence diminishes as the graphical load increases.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K demonstrates a clear and predictable drop, a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 223.3 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low reduces that to 194.1 FPS, a decrease of roughly 13%. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 141.9 FPS, which is about 36% lower than the 1080p result. This scaling pattern indicates that even at the lowest settings, the RTX 4070 Ti is the limiting factor, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.

When examining higher settings, the trend becomes even more pronounced. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 168.5 at 1080p to 129.2 at 1440p, and then to 66.7 at 4K. The 4K Ultra figure represents a substantial 60% reduction compared to the 1080p Ultra score. This steep decline highlights the intense load placed on the GPU at 4K with maximum detail, where the RTX 4070 Ti’s capabilities are fully taxed. The data suggests that the Ryzen 5 2600 is not the bottleneck at any resolution, as the FPS differences between settings are consistent with GPU workload changes rather than CPU limitations.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (223.3 FPS) and Ultra (168.5 FPS) is 54.8 FPS. At 1440p, that gap narrows to 64.9 FPS (194.1 vs 129.2), and at 4K, it expands to 75.2 FPS (141.9 vs 66.7). This widening gap indicates that the GPU is working progressively harder at higher resolutions, making the choice of settings more impactful on the final experience. The limiting component is unequivocally the graphics card, as the CPU’s role becomes less significant with each resolution increase.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 4K with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 72.2, which is a playable frame rate for most users, though it falls below the 144Hz threshold that some monitors support.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 196.3, indicating that the system can easily handle high refresh rate gaming at this resolution and preset combination.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 2600 holding back the RTX 4070 Ti in this game?

A: The data does not show significant CPU limitation. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent with GPU-bound behavior, and the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for the simulation’s demands.

Q: What is the best resolution for a smooth 144Hz experience?

A: At 1440p with High settings, the average FPS is 135.4, which is close to 144Hz but not fully there. For a guaranteed 144Hz, 1080p with High settings delivers 175.1 FPS, providing a comfortable margin.

Q: How does the combo rank among other tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 608 out of 1769 total tested combos, placing it in the upper half of the database. This indicates a solid performance level, though not at the very top tier.

Q: What is the FPS drop from 1080p Low to 4K Ultra?

A: The average FPS drops from 223.3 at 1080p Low to 66.7 at 4K Ultra, representing a 70% reduction in performance. This shows the extreme load that 4K Ultra places on the GPU.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. Its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11186 and a single-core score of 1579, indicate a capable mid-range part. In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role appears to be secondary to the GPU, as the game’s simulation logic does not appear to be heavily threaded or demanding on the processor.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 77 versus all other CPUs suggests it performs better than most processors in general benchmarks. However, its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-1345U (avgScore 19691, deltaPct -0.4) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (avgScore 19508, deltaPct 0.6), showing that the 2600 is closely matched with modern mobile parts. This indicates that while the CPU is not a top-tier performer, it is adequate for this game, which relies more on the GPU for frame generation.

The data shows that the CPU’s 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support contribute to its overall capability, but these factors do not translate into a bottleneck in this context. The FPS at 1080p Low (223.3) is high enough to suggest that the CPU can handle the game’s physics and system monitoring tasks without limiting the frame rate. The boost clock of 3.90 GHz provides sufficient single-thread performance for the game’s primary logic thread, and the 12 threads handle any background tasks efficiently.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest tested resolution, the average FPS ranges from 168.5 at Ultra to 223.3 at Low. The Medium preset delivers 196.3 FPS, while High yields 175.1 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system is well-suited for 1080p gaming, with even the most demanding settings producing frame rates well above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. The Low preset averages 194.1 FPS, which is still exceptionally high, while Medium achieves 172.4 FPS. High settings drop to 135.4 FPS, and Ultra falls to 129.2 FPS. This resolution presents a sweet spot for the combo, as it offers a balance between visual fidelity and frame rate, with High settings still providing a smooth experience for most monitors.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed significantly harder. The Low preset averages 141.9 FPS, which is surprisingly high for 4K, but the Medium preset drops to 102.9 FPS. High settings yield 72.2 FPS, and Ultra dips to 66.7 FPS. These figures show that 4K gaming is viable with this combo, but only at lower settings for high refresh rates. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 75.2 FPS, demonstrating the substantial impact of settings on performance at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 608 out of 1769 tested combinations, placing it in the 65th percentile of all combos in the database. This ranking reflects a strong overall performance, though it is not in the top tier. The GPU, an RTX 4070 Ti, has a percentile rank of 85 versus all GPUs, indicating it is a high-end part. However, the CPU’s percentile rank of 77 is slightly lower, suggesting that the processor may be a minor limiting factor in some scenarios, but not in this game.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the RTX 5090 Mobile (avgScore 45152, deltaPct -0.6) and the Intel Arc A730M (avgScore 45592, deltaPct -1.5), showing that the RTX 4070 Ti is closely matched with other high-performance parts. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-11600KF (avgScore 19740, deltaPct -0.6) and the Intel Core i7-10700F (avgScore 19485, deltaPct 0.7), indicate that the 2600 is competitive with newer processors despite its age. This data suggests that the combo’s ranking is primarily driven by the GPU’s strong performance, with the CPU providing adequate support.

The rank of 608 out of 1769 means that the combo outperforms a majority of other tested systems, but it is not among the top 34%. This positioning is expected for a combination of a mid-range CPU from 2018 with a high-end GPU from 2023. The data shows that the combo is well-balanced for Pc Building Simulator, as the game’s demands align with the strengths of both components.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best settings preset depends on the user’s target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p gaming, all settings presets provide excellent performance, with even Ultra delivering 168.5 FPS. The Medium preset at 196.3 FPS offers a good balance, but High at 175.1 FPS is recommended for those who want a slight visual boost without sacrificing frame rate. For 144Hz monitors, High or Ultra settings are viable, as both exceed the refresh rate.

At 1440p, the High preset at 135.4 FPS is the recommended choice for a smooth experience on 144Hz displays, as it provides near-maximum frame rates with high visual quality. The Medium preset at 172.4 FPS is better for those who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, but High offers a more immersive experience. Ultra at 129.2 FPS is still playable, but the marginal visual gains over High may not justify the small FPS drop.

For 4K gaming, the Low preset at 141.9 FPS is the only option that fully utilizes high refresh rate monitors, but it sacrifices significant visual quality. The Medium preset at 102.9 FPS is a good compromise for 60Hz displays, offering a balance between detail and performance. High at 72.2 FPS is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action, while Ultra at 66.7 FPS is only recommended for those who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate. The data indicates that Medium is the most balanced choice for 4K, providing a smooth experience without the stark visual downgrade of Low.