Palworld

Palworld, the survival title from 2024, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly across hardware configurations. This analysis examines the specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H mobile processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 laptop GPU. The data provided offers a clear picture of how this combo navigates the game's various presets and resolutions, highlighting a system that is firmly capable at 1080p but encounters predictable limitations as graphical demands escalate.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Meteor Lake architecture using a 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and can boost up to 4.80 GHz, with a 24 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration provides substantial multi-threaded headroom, which is relevant for a game like Palworld that simulates a living world with numerous creatures and player-built structures. The processor's performance profile is solid, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the benchmark database, with an average benchmark score of 32697.

In the context of Palworld's measured FPS, this CPU proves more than adequate to feed the RTX 4060 at the lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 160 FPS average. This high frame rate suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at this setting; the workload is light enough that the processor's 16 cores and 22 threads can manage the game's simulation and draw calls without breaking a sweat. The processor's strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1743, is also critical for maintaining stable frame times in a game where physics and AI calculations are often single-threaded.

However, the data shows that the CPU's relative strength shifts as settings increase. When comparing the Core Ultra 7 155H to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is virtually tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T, with a deltaPct of 0. This means the performance in general CPU benchmarks is nearly identical, and in Palworld, we can expect similar CPU-bound behavior. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is also extremely close, with a deltaPct of 0.1, indicating that the Ultra 7 is effectively in the same performance tier as these other mobile and low-power desktop parts. For a game like Palworld, this level of CPU performance ensures that the primary frame rate limiters are the GPU and its 8 GB of VRAM at higher settings, not the processor's ability to compute the game logic. The processor’s 28 W TDP is low, which is typical for a mobile chip, but it does not seem to hamper its ability to deliver high frame rates in this specific title.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. It features 3072 shading units, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores, with a boost clock of 2460 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. In the GPU benchmark hierarchy, this card sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639.

The GPU's role is the dominant factor in Palworld's performance, and its 8 GB VRAM is a critical component. The measured FPS shows a clear and consistent drop as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p Low, the GPU delivers 160 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to just 28 FPS. This is a classic sign of the GPU being the primary bottleneck. The 8 GB VRAM appears to be a limiting factor at higher settings. While the data does not provide direct VRAM usage numbers, the steep performance cliff from High to Ultra settings at 1440p (66 FPS down to 50 FPS) and 4K (37 FPS down to 28 FPS) suggests that the memory capacity is being saturated, forcing the system to manage assets less efficiently.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4060 is in a strange position. The data shows it is nearly identical in benchmark score to the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (deltaPct of -0.2), a much older desktop card, and the AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics (deltaPct of 0.3). This is likely a quirk of the benchmark scoring, as the RTX 4060's modern feature set and driver optimizations would likely make it substantially faster in a modern game like Palworld. However, based solely on the provided numbers, it indicates that the raw compute score of the RTX 4060 is on par with these parts. For Palworld, this means the GPU is not a powerhouse; it is a capable mid-range part that can handle the game at reasonable settings. The 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become constraints when pushing for 4K or maximum quality presets.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear illustration of how Palworld scales with resolution for this combo. Starting at 1080p, the system is clearly GPU-bound, as even the most demanding preset (Ultra) yields a playable 76 FPS average. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a 84 FPS difference (160 to 76 FPS), which shows a significant performance cost for the higher fidelity settings. This scaling is expected and demonstrates that the GPU's workload is increasing proportionally with the visual complexity.

Moving to 1440p, the performance drops across the board. The Low preset still manages a smooth 106 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 50 FPS. This resolution is the "sweet spot" for this hardware, as High settings still provide a very playable 66 FPS. The drop from 1080p High (100 FPS) to 1440p High (66 FPS) is a 34% reduction, which is a typical cost for the increased pixel count.

At 4K, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. The Low preset is the only one that approaches playability at 59 FPS, while High drops to 37 FPS, Medium to 47 FPS, and Ultra falls to a stuttery 28 FPS. The data shows a clear trend: the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep, with the Low preset falling from 160 FPS to 59 FPS (a 63% reduction) and High falling from 100 FPS to 37 FPS (a 63% reduction). This consistent 60%+ drop across settings when moving to 4K is a strong indicator that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU's performance is relatively constant across resolutions, so the frame rate is being dictated by the GPU's ability to render the increasingly large number of pixels. The 8 GB VRAM is also likely a major factor, as 4K textures and geometry can easily exceed this capacity, leading to the low average FPS observed.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the overall benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1757 out of 2944 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 40% of all tested systems. This ranking is a global statistic that includes all types of hardware, from high-end desktop rigs to low-end laptops, and it reflects the fact that this is a mid-range mobile solution.

This rank of 1757 out of 2944 suggests that while the combo is capable of running the game, there are a significant number of faster configurations. The ranking is heavily weighted by the GPU's performance, as Palworld is a graphics-intensive title. The RTX 4060, while a competent card, is not a top-tier performer, and the mobile variant used here is constrained by power and thermal limits. The CPU's strong performance, as indicated by its 83rd percentile ranking, helps the combo but is not enough to overcome the GPU's mid-range positioning.

The data shows that the combo is placed in a competitive field. The fact that the CPU's closest rivals are all within a 0.4% performance delta of each other means that the processor is not the differentiating factor in the ranking. Instead, the GPU's score and its interaction with the game's settings are what drive the combo to its 1757 position. For a user with this hardware, the ranking indicates that a solid 1080p and acceptable 1440p experience is achievable, but they should not expect to compete with high-end systems at 4K. The performance is what it is: a balanced but not exceptional pairing for Palworld.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 100 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare in performance to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697, which is virtually identical to the Intel Core i5-14600T's score of 32707, resulting in a deltaPct of 0.

Q: Is this combo capable of running Palworld at 4K with Ultra settings at a playable frame rate?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is only 28 FPS, which is below the generally acceptable threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the GPU's standing in the overall benchmark hierarchy?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this setup?

A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 28 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this setup?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 160 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table details the exact measured average FPS for each resolution and settings preset combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| 3840x2160 | High | 37 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 59 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 66 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 106 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 86 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 100 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 160 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 130 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76 |

The data shows a consistent pattern. At 1080p, all presets are playable, with Low and Medium providing high refresh rate experiences (160 and 130 FPS respectively). At 1440p, the Low and Medium presets remain the best options for smooth gameplay, while High is still viable. At 4K, only the Low preset approaches 60 FPS, and all other presets fall below 50 FPS, indicating that this resolution is not recommended for this hardware. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a minimum FPS of 73 and a maximum of 98, indicating some frame time variance but still a stable experience. At 1080p Medium, the variance is from 111 to 150 FPS, showing a wider range but with an average of 130 FPS.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo depends on the user's target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p, the High preset offers an excellent balance, delivering a 100 FPS average. This provides a fluid and visually detailed experience without the performance hit of the Ultra preset, which drops to 76 FPS. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz+), the Medium preset at 130 FPS or even the Low preset at 160 FPS are better choices to fully utilize the display's capabilities.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts. The High preset's 66 FPS average is acceptable for most players, but the Medium preset's 86 FPS provides a smoother experience with a moderate visual compromise. The data indicates that Ultra at 1440p is not ideal, as the 50 FPS average is below the 60 FPS target for most gamers. For 4K, the data suggests that this hardware is not well-suited for the resolution. The Low preset's 59 FPS is the only playable option, but it sacrifices significant visual fidelity. In this case, users are better off sticking to 1440p with Medium or High settings for a superior visual and performance balance.

The best overall experience is arguably the Medium preset at 1440p. It provides a high average FPS of 86 with a minimum of 73, ensuring that frame drops are not severe. This preset offers a good balance between visual quality and smoothness, making it the recommended choice for most users with this hardware. For 1080p, the High preset is the recommended choice for a standard 60-100Hz monitor, while Medium or Low is better suited for high refresh rate displays.