Palworld
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 122 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 43 | 57 | 73 | 91 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 102 | 132 | 163 |
| 1080p Full HD | 117 | 155 | 201 | 248 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld’s open-world survival gameplay can be surprisingly demanding, and the data for this Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination shows a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh 1440p gaming but begins to show its limits at 4K Ultra. The measured frames per second (FPS) across resolutions and presets paint a clear picture of where this combo excels and where you will need to make compromises. This analysis focuses strictly on the measured data, providing a practical guide for what to expect and how to configure the game.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial, indicating a shift in bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU as resolution increases. At the High preset, the average FPS scales from 155 at 1920x1080, down to 102 at 2560x1440, and finally to 57 at 3840x2160. This represents a 63% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is linear in this case, with each step up in resolution costing roughly a third of the previous performance.
The Low preset shows a similar trend, with a 248 average at 1080p, dropping to 163 at 1440p, and then to 91 at 4K. The fact that the 1080p Low result is so high (248 FPS) strongly suggests that at this resolution and preset, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is the primary limiting factor. The GPU is capable of rendering frames faster than the CPU can feed it, capping the output. This is a classic sign of a CPU bottleneck in a lower-resolution, lower-detail scenario.
However, the 4K results tell a different story. The gap between Low (91 FPS) and Ultra (43 FPS) at 4K is a massive 48 FPS. This wide delta indicates that at 4K, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the dominant constraint. The GPU is being fully utilized, and its performance is heavily influenced by the graphical workload. The data shows that this combo is best suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming, where it can maintain high average FPS without maxing out the GPU's capabilities. Pushing to 4K is possible, but the user will have to accept a significant performance hit, especially on higher presets.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the clear workhorse at higher resolutions. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth provides the necessary data throughput for Palworld's detailed environments at 2560x1440. The memory configuration is sufficient to handle the textures and assets at this resolution without causing a performance cliff, as evidenced by the 102 FPS average at High settings.
The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 1920 MHz and a boost of 2475 MHz, are a significant factor in its rasterization performance. This is reflected in the benchmark scores, where the card achieves a Passmark G3D score of 26927. The data suggests the RTX 4070 is not the bottleneck at 1080p, as the CPU limits performance there. It is only when the resolution is increased to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 that the GPU's role becomes fully dominant, and the frame rate becomes directly tied to the graphical settings.
At 4K Ultra, the card's limits are exposed. The 43 FPS average is below the 60 FPS target that many players consider the minimum for a smooth experience. The transition from High to Ultra at 4K is particularly punishing, with a 14 FPS drop (from 57 to 43). This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces settings that are disproportionately heavy on the GPU, such as advanced lighting or shadow effects, that the RTX 4070 struggles to process at this resolution. For a consistent experience at 4K, the data indicates that the High preset is the most demanding setting this GPU can reasonably handle.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the ideal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For a 1080p gamer with a high-refresh monitor, the Medium preset is the sweet spot. It delivers a 201 FPS average, which is only 47 FPS less than the Low preset but provides a significant visual upgrade. The High preset at 155 FPS is also viable if a 144Hz monitor is the target, and it offers a better visual experience than Medium.
For 1440p, the High preset is the best choice for a premium experience. It achieves a 102 FPS average, which is well-suited for a high-refresh 1440p monitor and looks significantly better than the Medium preset's 132 FPS. The 30 FPS jump from High to Medium (from 102 to 132) is not worth the visual fidelity loss for most users. The Ultra preset at 77 FPS is playable if visual quality is the absolute priority, but the 25 FPS drop from High makes it a less attractive option for competitive or fast-paced gameplay.
At 4K, the recommendation is to use the High preset, which averages 57 FPS. While not a locked 60 FPS, it is a playable experience and is a massive 14 FPS improvement over the Ultra preset's 43 FPS. The Low preset at 91 FPS is also an option for players who prioritize frame rate above all else, but the visual quality will be significantly compromised. The data suggests that the Medium preset (73 FPS) is a good middle ground for 4K, providing a balance between visual fidelity and smoothness. Ultimately, the best experience per the measured rows is either High at 1440p or Medium at 4K, depending on your preference for resolution or detail.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Palworld, this pairing performs respectably but not exceptionally. The combo rank is 674 out of 2944 tested combos, placing it in the top 23% of all configurations. This is a strong result, indicating that this system will handle the game better than the vast majority of other PC builds in the database.
The ranking is a holistic measure, reflecting the balanced nature of the CPU and GPU. The Core Ultra 5 225 and RTX 4070 work together without a major bottleneck at typical gaming resolutions (1080p and 1440p), which is a key factor in its high percentile. The system's performance is not held back by a weak link, which is often the cause of lower rankings for other combos.
To put the individual components into perspective, the CPU's average benchmark score of 36938 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with its closest rival being the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with a score of 36945, a 0% delta. The GPU's average benchmark score is 37648, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with its closest rival being the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a score of 37628, a 0.1% delta. While both components are above average, the combo's rank of 674 indicates that there are many other combinations in the database that can achieve higher frame rates in Palworld, likely with more powerful GPUs or CPUs. This is a solid mid-to-high-tier pairing, not a top-tier one.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 plays a crucial role in ensuring the GPU is fed with enough data, particularly at lower resolutions. With 10 cores and 10 threads, and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, it provides ample processing power for Palworld's game logic, physics, and AI. The CPU's performance is highlighted by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 and single-core score of 3655, demonstrating strong capability in both multithreaded and single-threaded workloads.
The data shows that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p resolution. At the Low preset, the FPS jumps to 248, but even at the High preset, it reaches 155 FPS. This high frame rate suggests that the CPU is working at its limit to process the game's simulation, preventing the GPU from rendering even more frames. This is not a negative; it simply means the CPU is providing a high performance ceiling for the GPU to work within.
At 1440p and 4K, the CPU's role diminishes as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The difference in FPS between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p (163 vs 77 FPS) is almost entirely due to the GPU's workload. However, the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that it can keep up with the GPU's demands even at these higher resolutions, preventing stutters or frame drops caused by CPU limitations. The CPU's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth help maintain smooth data flow, contributing to the stable average FPS seen in the 1440p High preset. The CPU is not the star of the show, but it is a reliable foundation that does not hold the RTX 4070 back.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo at 1080p?
A: The highest average FPS for this combo at 1920x1080 is 248, which is achieved on the Low settings preset.
Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming at playable frame rates?
A: Yes, but only on lower to medium settings. The data shows a 91 FPS average on Low and a 73 FPS average on Medium at 3840x2160, while High and Ultra drop to 57 and 43 FPS, respectively.
Q: At which resolution and settings does this combo deliver a 100+ FPS experience?
A: A 100+ FPS average is achievable at 2560x1440 on the High preset with 102 FPS. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 155 FPS, and the Medium preset delivers 201 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck at 1080p High settings?
A: The data suggests the CPU is the limiting factor. The 1080p Low preset reaches 248 FPS, while the High preset is 155 FPS. The large gap between presets at this resolution indicates the GPU can handle more work, but the CPU's processing of game logic caps the frame rate.
Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 225's performance compare to its closest rival?
A: The Core Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36938, which is statistically identical to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, which has a score of 36945 and a deltaPct of 0%.
Q: How does the RTX 4070's performance compare to its closest rival?
A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a score of 37628, resulting in a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning the RTX 4070 is slightly faster in synthetic benchmarks.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 225
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 91.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 73.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 57.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 163.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 132.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 102.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 248.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 201.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 117.0 |
Palworld with iUltra 5 225 + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 225 + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.