Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 30 | 43 | 49 |
| 1440p QHD | 42 | 56 | 73 | 93 |
| 1080p Full HD | 68 | 89 | 111 | 142 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 6600, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld on the Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 pairing presents a clear case of GPU-bound performance. The data shows a system where the 24-core CPU is effectively a bystander, while the Radeon RX 6600, which sits at the 69th percentile of all GPUs, becomes the primary determinant of frame rates across all tested configurations. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, scaling behavior, and the specific roles each component plays.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings?
A: The measured average frame rate is 89.4 FPS. This is the result of the RX 6600's hardware, which includes a boost clock of 2491 MHz and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79824, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. It is effectively tied with the AMD EPYC 7413, which scores 80041, showing only a -0.3% delta. It is also 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900KF.
Q: Is this combination strong enough for a stable 60 FPS experience at 2560x1440?
A: At 2560x1440, the system can maintain an average of 56.1 FPS on High settings, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. To get a comfortable margin, you would need to lower the settings to Medium, which yields an average of 72.6 FPS.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded in the data?
A: The highest average frame rate is 142.2 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
Q: How does the RX 6600's benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
A: The RX 6600 has an average benchmark score of 25235, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 25120. This means the RX 6600 is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 3060 Ti in the provided aggregate benchmarks.
Q: What is the performance impact of switching from Medium to Ultra at 4K?
A: The data shows a significant drop from 43.4 FPS on Medium to 24.2 FPS on Ultra at 3840x2160. This represents a 44.2% reduction in average frame rate when moving to the highest preset.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the bottleneck in this configuration. The GPU's specifications—8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth—are directly reflected in the performance scaling. The boost clock of 2491 MHz and the 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are the engine behind the frame generation.
The GPU's benchmark results place it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 25235. The data shows it is a direct competitor to the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, which scores 25180 (a 0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 25120 (a 0.5% delta). This positioning indicates a mid-range card that, when paired with a high-end CPU, will always be the limiting factor in demanding titles like Palworld.
The most telling evidence of the GPU's role is the frame rate collapse at higher resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the card produces 142.2 FPS, but pushing to Ultra at the same resolution drops the frame rate to 67.8 FPS. This shows the GPU struggling with the increased shading and texture demands. At 4K, the card's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface are insufficient for High and Ultra presets, resulting in averages of 29.9 FPS and 24.2 FPS, respectively. These are not playable frame rates, confirming that the RX 6600 is not suited for 4K gaming in this title.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i9-14900K is a powerhouse that is underutilized in this pairing. With 24 cores, 32 threads, and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, the CPU's capabilities far exceed what Palworld demands at the tested settings. The CPU's benchmark scores confirm its high-end status: it scores 49872 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7040 in single-core. Its average benchmark score of 79824 places it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs.
Its nearest rivals show how close the top of the market is. The AMD EPYC 7413, a server chip, scores 80041, a -0.3% difference. The Intel Core i9-14900KF, a variant without integrated graphics, scores 79245, a 0.7% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and 265K also score 79240 and 79102, respectively, showing a 0.7% and 0.9% delta. These numbers show that the 14900K is performing at the expected level for its class.
In Palworld, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The data implies that the CPU is never the bottleneck, as the frame rates scale almost entirely with the GPU load. For instance, at 1080p Low, the 142.2 FPS average is likely near the CPU's limit for the game's engine, but even then, the GPU is still the limiting factor as the FPS drops to 89.4 at High. The 14900K has ample headroom, making it a future-proof component, but its power is not being fully tapped in this specific benchmark scenario.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets.
At 1920x1080, the system is at its most fluid. The Low preset delivers an average of 142.2 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium reduces this to 110.5 FPS, which is still a very smooth experience. High settings bring the average down to 89.4 FPS, which is excellent for most gaming scenarios. Ultra is the most demanding, producing an average of 67.8 FPS, which is still playable but begins to show the GPU's strain.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance takes a noticeable hit. Low settings yield an average of 92.6 FPS, which is good. Medium settings drop to 72.6 FPS, which is still a solid figure. High settings produce 56.1 FPS, which is borderline for a 60 Hz display, requiring a slight compromise on visual fidelity. Ultra settings fall to 41.6 FPS, which is a less desirable experience for fast-paced gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the RX 6600 is clearly out of its depth. Low settings are the only playable option, with an average of 49.1 FPS. Medium drops to 43.4 FPS, and High falls to 29.9 FPS. Ultra is the worst performer, with a 24.2 FPS average, making the game nearly unplayable at this resolution.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is severe and clearly illustrates the GPU bottleneck. At High settings, the system goes from 89.4 FPS at 1080p to 29.9 FPS at 4K. This is a 66.6% reduction in performance. This is a classic sign of a GPU that is limited by its memory bandwidth and fill rate. The RX 6600's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 64 ROPs are simply not enough to handle the pixel count at 4K.
The scaling is slightly different for the Low preset. At 1080p Low, the system hits 142.2 FPS, which drops to 49.1 FPS at 4K. This is a 65.5% reduction. While the percentage is similar, the absolute numbers show that even at Low settings, the 4K resolution overwhelms the GPU. The fact that the CPU is not a factor is highlighted by the consistent percentage drops across settings. If the CPU were the limit, the frame rates would not drop as sharply with resolution increases, because the CPU workload is relatively constant.
The data suggests that the i9-14900K is capable of pushing far more frames than the RX 6600 can render. The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a moderate drop, but the jump to 4K is a cliff. This is a critical consideration for any builder considering this pairing: the CPU has headroom for a future GPU upgrade, but the current GPU caps the overall experience.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the best experience depends on the target resolution.
For 1920x1080, the High preset is the sweet spot. At 89.4 FPS, it provides a smooth, responsive experience without the performance penalty of Ultra, which drops to 67.8 FPS. The visual jump from High to Ultra is often not worth a 24.2% reduction in frame rate. For competitive play, the Low preset at 142.2 FPS is the best choice, prioritizing frame rate over visuals.
For 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. It delivers 72.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target and maintains a good balance of visual quality and performance. High settings at 56.1 FPS are workable, but you will notice the difference from a solid 60 FPS. Ultra at 41.6 FPS is not recommended for a good experience.
For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only viable option for a playable experience, yielding 49.1 FPS. Even then, the frame rate is not ideal. This resolution is simply beyond the capability of the RX 6600 in Palworld. The data shows that this pairing is not suited for 4K gaming, and users should stick to 1080p or 1440p for the best results.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i9-14900K
AMD Radeon RX 6600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 6600 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 49.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 43.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 92.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 72.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 56.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 41.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 142.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 110.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 89.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 67.8 |
Palworld with ii9-14900K + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 6600 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii9-14900K + RX 6600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.