Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 38 | 49 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 69 | 89 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 79 | 104 | 135 | 167 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld is an early-access survival title that leans heavily on both CPU and GPU depending on the settings and resolution you throw at it. The combination of an Intel Core i7-14700F with an AMD Radeon RX 9060 lands at rank 2181 out of 3711 tested combos in this game, which places it in the lower-middle portion of the database. That ranking is not a verdict on the hardware’s quality, but rather a reflection of how this specific pairing handles Palworld’s particular demands, especially given the GPU’s modest 8 GB VRAM and the CPU’s strong multi-core architecture.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 2181 out of 3711 tested combinations puts it in the 41st percentile of all pairings in the database for Palworld. That is a below-average standing, and the data suggests the bottleneck is almost entirely on the graphics side. The Intel Core i7-14700F is a high-end desktop processor with an average benchmark score of 53620 and a percentile ranking of 91 against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 91% of processors in general compute tests. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014 and a percentile of 59 against all GPUs, which is a solid mid-range result but not exceptional. In Palworld, this disparity shows up clearly: the CPU has plenty of headroom, but the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings.
Compared to the nearest rivals for the CPU, the i7-14700F sits within a tight cluster. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, which is 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, which is 0.6% lower. The AMD EPYC 7313P trails by 0.8% with a score of 53206. These deltas are negligible in real-world gaming, so the CPU is not the limiting factor here. On the GPU side, the RX 9060’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16129 and is 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and RX 7700 are 1% lower, and the Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% lower. Again, these are close margins, but the RX 9060’s overall standing in the 59th percentile for GPUs suggests it is a capable mid-range card, not a high-end one.
The rank of 2181 is heavily influenced by the fact that Palworld is a game that benefits from strong rasterization and high VRAM capacity at 4K, both of which are areas where this GPU is only average. At 1080p, the combo performs respectably, but as resolution climbs, the rank would likely drop further if re-evaluated per resolution, because the GPU’s 8 GB frame buffer becomes a constraint. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is never the issue—it is a top-tier processor for productivity and gaming alike, but pairing it with a mid-range GPU in a game like Palworld means the combo’s rank reflects the GPU’s limitations rather than any CPU deficiency.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU’s base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. That boost clock is high for a mid-range card, which helps in lighter scenes, but sustained performance in Palworld depends more on memory bandwidth and capacity.
The memory configuration is the key limitation. The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. In Palworld, which has large open-world environments with many objects and textures, 8 GB is enough for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but at 4K Ultra, the frame buffer fills up quickly. The measured FPS data supports this: at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 29, which is unplayable for most users. At 4K High, it climbs to 38 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it reaches 49 FPS with a minimum of 42 and a maximum of 57. Only at 4K Low does it cross the 60 FPS threshold, hitting 61 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity are the primary bottlenecks at high resolutions, not the compute units.
The GPU’s compute performance is solid for its class. It achieves 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s, with a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s. These numbers are competitive with the RTX 3060 Ti, which is its closest rival in average benchmark score. However, Palworld is not a heavily compute-bound game at lower settings; it becomes memory-bound at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is the single most important spec to consider here. If you plan to play at 1080p or 1440p, the RX 9060 is sufficient. At 4K, you will need to drop settings to Low or Medium to maintain playable frame rates, and even then, the 61 FPS at 4K Low is borderline.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K, which reveals where the bottleneck lies. At 1080p Low, the combo delivers 167 FPS average, which is extremely high and indicates that the CPU and GPU are both capable of handling the game’s lighter load. At 1440p Low, that drops to 110 FPS, a 34% decrease. At 4K Low, it falls to 61 FPS, another 45% decrease from 1440p. This steep drop-off from 1440p to 4K is classic GPU-bound behavior—the CPU is not the limiting factor because the frame rate is still high, but the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity are being saturated.
For Medium settings, the pattern is similar but with lower absolute numbers. At 1080p Medium, the average is 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 and a maximum of 156. At 1440p Medium, it drops to 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 and a maximum of 103. At 4K Medium, it falls to 49 FPS with a minimum of 42 and a maximum of 57. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 34%, and from 1440p to 4K is 45%, which again points to the GPU being the limiting component. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is not struggling at any resolution; it has plenty of headroom.
High settings show a similar trend. At 1080p High, the average is 104 FPS. At 1440p High, it is 69 FPS, a 34% drop. At 4K High, it is 38 FPS, a 45% drop from 1440p. Ultra settings are the most demanding, with 79 FPS at 1080p, 52 FPS at 1440p, and 29 FPS at 4K. The consistent percentage drops across all settings indicate that the scaling is purely resolution-driven, not settings-driven. This is a strong signal that the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions, while at 1080p, the combo has enough performance to keep frame rates high regardless of settings.
The implication for a builder is straightforward: if you target 1440p, this combo is viable for Medium to High settings, but you will need to avoid Ultra at that resolution. For 4K, only Low settings are playable, and even then, 61 FPS is marginal. The CPU will not hold you back at any resolution; the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the constraining factors.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong performance across all settings. On Low, the average FPS is 167, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate of most monitors. On Medium, it drops to 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 and a maximum of 156, still very smooth. High settings yield 104 FPS average, which is excellent for a survival game with dense environments. Ultra settings bring the average down to 79 FPS, which is still playable but shows the GPU starting to work harder. The data indicates that 1080p is not a problem for this pairing—even Ultra settings remain above 60 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance becomes more moderate. Low settings produce an average of 110 FPS, which is good for competitive play. Medium settings drop to 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 and a maximum of 103, which is smooth for most gamers. High settings yield 69 FPS, which is acceptable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Ultra settings fall to 52 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and may cause noticeable stutter in busy areas. The minimum FPS for Medium at 1440p is 76, which suggests that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above 60, but at Ultra, the lack of VRAM likely causes dips below that.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become severe. Low settings average 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS line but with no headroom. Medium settings average 49 FPS with a minimum of 42 and a maximum of 57, meaning you will see drops below 45 FPS in heavy scenes. High settings average 38 FPS, which is only suitable for slower gameplay. Ultra settings average 29 FPS, which is effectively unplayable for a survival game that requires quick reactions. The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings at each resolution, but the pattern is clear: at 4K, the RX 9060 cannot keep up with the game’s demands.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo good for 1080p gaming in Palworld?
A: Yes, the data shows excellent performance at 1920x1080. Low settings average 167 FPS, Medium 135 FPS, High 104 FPS, and even Ultra maintains 79 FPS. All settings are above 60 FPS, making this a very capable 1080p setup for the game.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K in Palworld?
A: Only at Low settings, where it averages 61 FPS. At Medium, the average drops to 49 FPS, and at High or Ultra, it falls to 38 FPS and 29 FPS respectively. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the limiting factors at 4K.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701), 0.3% higher than the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469), 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288), and 0.8% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206). These are negligible differences in gaming.
Q: What is the GPU’s main weakness in this game?
A: The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for high settings at 4K. The frame rate drops significantly from 1440p to 4K, indicating memory bandwidth saturation rather than compute limitations.
Q: What settings are recommended for 1440p?
A: Medium settings are the sweet spot, averaging 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 FPS. High settings average 69 FPS, which is playable, but Ultra drops to 52 FPS. For a stable experience, Medium or High is recommended.
Q: How does the GPU rank against all GPUs?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has a percentile rank of 59 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16129 and is 0.7% higher.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-14700F is a Raptor Lake Refresh processor with 20 cores and 28 threads, split between performance and efficiency cores. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it efficient for a desktop chip. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and its 33 MB of shared L3 cache provides ample room for game data. In Palworld, which is known for its sprawling open world and many simultaneous entities, the CPU’s multi-threading capabilities are important for maintaining consistent frame rates.
Benchmark results show the i7-14700F is a powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35122 in multi-core and 4958 in single-core. Geekbench scores are 19620 multi-core and 2429 single-core. Passmark multithread score is 41317, and single-thread is 4257. These numbers place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 91% of processors in general compute tasks. Its nearest rivals, as noted, are within 1% of its average score, so there is no meaningful performance gap between them in most applications.
In Palworld specifically, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and handle game logic, AI, and physics. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 167 FPS, which is high enough that the CPU is not a bottleneck—if it were, the frame rate would plateau regardless of resolution. However, when the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the FPS drops proportionally, which indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads are more than enough for this game, and even at 4K Ultra with 29 FPS, the CPU is likely idle waiting for the GPU to catch up.
The i7-14700F’s 33 MB L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.40 GHz help with single-threaded performance, which is important for games that rely on one or two main threads. Palworld is not a particularly well-optimized game, so CPU performance can matter in dense bases or when many Pals are on screen, but the data does not show any CPU-related frame drops—the minimum FPS values for Medium settings at 1080p (115) and 1440p (76) are still high, suggesting the CPU maintains consistent performance. If you were to pair this CPU with a stronger GPU, you would likely see better 4K performance, but with the RX 9060, the CPU has ample headroom. In summary, the i7-14700F is a top-tier processor that is not the limiting factor in this combo; it provides a stable foundation, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute performance cap the overall results.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700F
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 61.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 110.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 167.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 135.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 104.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 79.0 |
Palworld with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700F + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.