Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 93 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 41 | 57 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 58 | 76 | 101 | 129 |
| 1080p Full HD | 89 | 120 | 156 | 192 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-9400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld’s measured performance with the Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 shows a configuration that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but reveals CPU limitations at 1080p, placing it in the middle of the database’s tested combos. The data indicates a playable experience across most settings, though the transition from 1440p to 4K is punishing, and the CPU’s six-core, six-thread design becomes a notable constraint at lower resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is steep and consistent, clearly identifying the GPU as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 120.1 FPS at 1080p to 76.1 FPS at 1440p, a 36.6% reduction, and then further to 41.2 FPS at 4K, which is a 45.9% drop from 1440p. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU that is being pushed to its limits, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, demanding significantly more from the rendering hardware.
However, the scaling is not purely linear with pixel count, which points to other bottlenecks. At Low settings, the frame rate at 1080p is 192.1 FPS, but at 1440p it drops to 128.8 FPS, and at 4K it lands at 69.1 FPS. The 4K result is still more than double the 1080p Low score, but the 1440p result is only 67% of the 1080p score. This suggests that while the RTX 5060 is the main limiter at 4K, the Intel Core i5-9400 starts to cap performance at 1080p, preventing the GPU from reaching even higher frame rates. The gap between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution further confirms this: at 1080p, the spread is 103.4 FPS (from 88.7 to 192.1), while at 4K, the spread is only 37.9 FPS (from 31.2 to 69.1). The wider spread at lower resolutions indicates that the CPU can still feed the GPU enough data for settings to matter, while at 4K, the GPU is so saturated that the settings changes have a smaller relative impact. Benchmark results indicate that for 4K gaming, users should expect to dial settings down to Low to achieve playable frame rates, as even Medium only yields 57.4 FPS.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a high frame rate?
A: At 1920x1080, the combo achieves an average of 120.1 FPS on High settings and 156.3 FPS on Medium, making it the only resolution where a consistently high refresh rate experience is possible across multiple presets.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Palworld?
A: Yes, but with significant compromises. The measured data shows 41.2 FPS on High and 31.2 FPS on Ultra at 3840x2160, which are below the 60 FPS threshold. Only the Low preset at 4K, with 69.1 FPS, provides a playable frame rate.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1080p?
A: The Intel Core i5-9400, with its 6 cores and 6 threads, appears to be a limiting factor at 1920x1080. The fact that the FPS at Low settings (192.1) is not significantly higher than at High settings (120.1) suggests the CPU is nearing its ceiling in this scenario, preventing the RTX 5060 from being fully utilized.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS jumps from 57.6 on Ultra to 128.8 on Low, a substantial 123.6% performance increase. This makes Low the only preset at this resolution that comfortably exceeds 120 FPS.
Q: Is the RTX 5060 a strong performer relative to other GPUs in the database?
A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 30109 and sits in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, has a nearly identical average score of 30097, showing a deltaPct of 0.0, meaning they are statistically tied in raw compute performance.
Q: How does the CPU's benchmark score compare to its immediate rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2305, placing it in the 50th percentile of all CPUs. It is virtually tied with the Intel Core i3-10305, which has a score of 2300 and a deltaPct of 0.2%, while it is slightly behind the Intel Core i7-8809G, which scores 2319 with a deltaPct of -0.6%.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-9400 is a six-core, six-thread processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture, running on the Intel Socket 1151 platform. Its base clock is 2.90 GHz with a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, and it has a 9 MB shared L3 cache. In the context of Palworld, this CPU’s role is to handle game logic, AI, and physics, which the benchmark data suggests it does adequately but without much headroom. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7969 and single-core score of 1125 indicate a mid-range performer, which aligns with its 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs.
The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 192.1 FPS. This is a high number, but the fact that the RTX 5060 is capable of much higher frame rates in less CPU-intensive scenarios suggests the i5-9400 is the limiting factor here. The processor’s performance is closely matched by its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i3-10305, which has a 0.2% higher average score. This indicates that the i5-9400 is not a performance outlier but rather a typical mid-range part from its generation. Its 65W TDP and support for DDR4 memory make it a standard, efficient choice, but its six threads mean it can struggle in modern titles that benefit from higher thread counts. The measured FPS at 1440p and 4K shows less CPU impact, as the GPU becomes the dominant constraint, but the 1080p results clearly show the i5-9400 is the component that caps the system’s ultimate performance ceiling.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. The Low preset achieves an average of 192.1 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. The Medium preset follows with 156.3 FPS, and High settings still produce a very smooth 120.1 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still manages an average of 88.7 FPS, which is playable on high refresh rate monitors.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops are significant but manageable. Low settings average 128.8 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. Medium settings yield 101.2 FPS, providing a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. The High preset averages 76.1 FPS, which is acceptable for most gamers, but the Ultra preset falls to 57.6 FPS, making it a borderline choice for those seeking a locked 60 FPS experience.
At 3840x2160, the system is clearly GPU-limited. The Low preset is the only one that provides a comfortable frame rate, averaging 69.1 FPS. Medium settings drop to 57.4 FPS, and High falls to 41.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of just 31.2 FPS, which is not ideal for a smooth gameplay experience. The data shows a clear pattern: for 4K, Low settings are required, while 1440p can handle High settings, and 1080p can run Ultra without issue.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 847th out of 1718 tested combos in Palworld. This places it in the 49th percentile of all configurations in the database, indicating that while it is not a top-tier setup, it is also far from the bottom. This mid-pack ranking is consistent with the individual component benchmarks, where the CPU sits at the 50th percentile and the GPU at the 73rd percentile.
The combo’s rank suggests that the CPU is holding the system back relative to what the GPU could achieve with a stronger processor. The RTX 5060’s performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, with a deltaPct of 0.0, meaning the GPU is capable of competing with much more powerful cards. However, the i5-9400’s mid-range standing means the overall combo does not break into the upper echelons of the rankings. The data implies that pairing this GPU with a higher-tier CPU would yield a significantly better rank, but as configured, this system represents a balanced, mid-range gaming PC that can handle Palworld at various settings, but without the headroom for extreme frame rates at high resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
For a 1920x1080 display, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it provides an average of 88.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and offers the highest visual fidelity. If a higher refresh rate is preferred, Medium settings deliver 156.3 FPS, which is excellent for 144Hz monitors, and High settings at 120.1 FPS are also a strong option.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended choice, offering an average of 76.1 FPS, which balances visual quality with smooth performance. For gamers who prioritize frame rate, the Medium preset at 101.2 FPS is a solid alternative, while Low at 128.8 FPS is the best for competitive play. The Ultra preset should be avoided at this resolution, as its 57.6 FPS average is below the ideal 60 FPS target.
For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only realistic option, with an average of 69.1 FPS. This provides a playable experience, but users will have to sacrifice most visual enhancements. The Medium preset at 57.4 FPS is borderline playable, but the High and Ultra presets are too demanding, with averages of 41.2 FPS and 31.2 FPS, respectively. The data clearly indicates that 4K gaming with this combo requires the lowest settings for a smooth experience.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the dominant component in this pairing, based on the benchmark data. It is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU with 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, built on a 5 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU’s boost clock is 2497 MHz, and its FP32 performance is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS. With a Passmark G3D score of 20891, it ranks in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, putting it on par with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, which has a deltaPct of 0.0.
In Palworld, the RTX 5060’s role is to handle the rendering workload, which becomes the primary bottleneck at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The measured FPS at 4K, ranging from 31.2 on Ultra to 69.1 on Low, shows the GPU being pushed to its limits. Its 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for the game’s textures at these settings, but the 128-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors at higher resolutions. The GPU’s performance is consistent with its benchmark score, demonstrating a capable mid-to-high-end card that excels at 1080p and 1440p but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with this CPU. The launch MSRP is 299 USD.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-9400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-9400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 57.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 41.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 128.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 101.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 76.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 57.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 192.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 156.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 120.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 88.7 |
Palworld with ii5-9400 + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with ii5-9400 + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.