Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 89 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 44 | 51 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 73 | 96 | 119 |
| 1080p Full HD | 85 | 115 | 146 | 184 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-9400 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-9400 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination ranks 939th out of 1,718 tested combos in Palworld, placing it just above the median. This mid-pack positioning reflects a pairing where the GPU is clearly the dominant performance driver, but the six-core CPU is sufficient to avoid being a severe bottleneck at most settings. The data indicates a system that delivers smooth, high-refresh-rate gameplay at 1080p and remains very playable at 1440p, with 4K being the only resolution where the hardware begins to struggle under maximum load.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 939 out of 1,718 places it in the 54th percentile of all tested configurations for Palworld. This is a solidly mid-tier result, suggesting that while this setup is far from the fastest available, it comfortably outperforms a significant majority of systems. The ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU's strong performance profile, as the RX 6700 XT sits in the 77th percentile among all GPUs. The CPU, however, is an average performer, ranking in the 50th percentile. The combination of a high-percentile GPU with a mid-pack CPU results in a system that is balanced for gaming but not exceptional, with the CPU potentially limiting performance in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the undisputed performance anchor of this combo. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for Palworld's textures and geometry at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's high clock speeds, with a base of 2321 MHz and a boost of 2581 MHz, are key to its performance. The chip is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 7 nm process, featuring 2,560 shading units and 40 ray accelerators. Its FP32 compute rating of 13.21 TFLOPS underscores its raw power. In benchmark comparisons, the RX 6700 XT is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6800, trailing it by only 0.7% in average score, and it leads the NVIDIA RTX A5000 by 1.3%. This performance level is reflected in the measured FPS, where the combo achieves over 115 FPS on High settings at 1920x1080.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-9400 plays a supporting but crucial role. With 6 cores and 6 threads, it lacks hyper-threading, which can be a limitation in modern, multi-threaded titles. Its base clock of 2.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.10 GHz are modest by today's standards. The CPU's average benchmark score of 2,305 places it in a dead heat with the Intel Core i3-10305, which scores 2,300 (a 0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i3-1125G4, which scores 2,299 (also a 0.2% delta). It is only 0.4% ahead of the Intel Xeon E-2134. This indicates that the i5-9400 provides just enough processing power to keep the RX 6700 XT fed in most scenarios. However, the data suggests that at lower resolutions, such as 1080p, the CPU can become a limiting factor, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential in less demanding scenes. The lack of multi-threading is a notable weakness for a game like Palworld, which involves complex world simulations.
FAQ
Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT a strong performer for Palworld?
A: Yes, the data strongly indicates this. The GPU ranks in the 77th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 33,721 is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800. This translates to high frame rates in practice, such as 115.3 FPS on High settings at 1080p.
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-9400 stack up against its closest competitors?
A: It is essentially tied with several other mid-range parts. Its average score of 2,305 is just 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i3-10305 and 0.4% higher than the Intel Xeon E-2134, but it is 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-8809G. This places it as a perfectly average CPU.
Q: Is this combo better suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming?
A: The data shows it excels at both, but is particularly strong at 1080p. At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, it achieves 145.9 FPS, and at 2560x1440 with High settings, it still delivers a very smooth 72.6 FPS. This makes it a great choice for high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors and solid 1440p gaming.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Palworld?
A: It can, but with compromises. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate on High settings drops to 44.1 FPS. This is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. To get a smoother 4K experience, the user would need to lower the settings to Medium (51.4 FPS) or Low (68.6 FPS).
Q: What is the limiting factor for this combo in Palworld?
A: At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be a constraint due to its lack of multi-threading. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck, as the frame rate drops significantly across all settings. The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K highlights this shift.
Q: What kind of performance can I expect on Ultra settings?
A: Ultra settings are demanding for this combo. At 1080p, it averages 84.7 FPS, which is good. At 1440p, it drops to a playable 59.3 FPS. However, at 4K, the Ultra preset yields only 29.8 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay and indicates the GPU is overwhelmed.
Resolution Scaling
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear transition in what limits this system. At 1920x1080, the combo is highly capable, producing 184.4 FPS on Low settings and 115.3 FPS on High. This high frame rate at lower resolutions suggests the workload is light enough for the CPU to keep up, but it is also here that the CPU's limitations are most likely to surface in specific in-game scenes. Moving to 2560x1440, there is a predictable performance drop: High settings fall from 115.3 FPS to 72.6 FPS, a decrease of about 37%. This indicates the GPU is now doing significantly more work. The most dramatic shift occurs at 3840x2160, where the system is clearly GPU-bound. High settings plummet to 44.1 FPS, and Ultra settings can only manage 29.8 FPS. This steep decline from 1440p to 4K confirms that the RX 6700 XT's 12 GB frame buffer and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are tested to their limits at 4K, and the CPU's role becomes negligible as the GPU struggles to fill the massive pixel count.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the Medium settings preset is the optimal choice for this combo. At 1920x1080, it delivers a very high 145.9 FPS, which is more than sufficient for a smooth experience. At 2560x1440, Medium settings produce 95.5 FPS, which is excellent for a high-refresh-rate monitor. Even at 3840x2160, Medium settings yield a playable 51.4 FPS. The High preset is also a strong option for users with 1080p or 1440p displays, offering 115.3 FPS and 72.6 FPS respectively, but it becomes too demanding at 4K. The Ultra preset is only recommended for 1080p gaming, where it achieves 84.7 FPS. For 4K enthusiasts, the Low preset provides the only truly smooth experience at 68.6 FPS, but this comes at a significant visual cost. The data clearly indicates Medium is the sweet spot for this hardware.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates its strength. The Low preset yields an average of 184.4 FPS, offering an exceptionally smooth experience. Medium settings still provide a very high 145.9 FPS. High settings bring the frame rate down to 115.3 FPS, which is still excellent. The Ultra preset is the most demanding at this resolution, producing 84.7 FPS, which is very playable.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings average 118.7 FPS, which is great for competitive play. Medium settings drop to 95.5 FPS, a very good result for the increased resolution. High settings deliver 72.6 FPS, which is smooth for most titles. Ultra settings, however, reduce the frame rate to 59.3 FPS, which is right on the edge of ideal smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The Low preset is the only one to offer a consistently smooth experience, averaging 68.6 FPS. Medium settings fall to 51.4 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. High settings produce 44.1 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to a disappointing 29.8 FPS, indicating that this combination is not well-suited for maximum quality 4K gaming.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-9400
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-9400 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 68.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 44.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 118.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 95.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 72.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 59.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 184.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 145.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 115.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 84.7 |
Palworld with ii5-9400 + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with ii5-9400 + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.