Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 89 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 39 | 57 | 68 |
| 1440p QHD | 58 | 76 | 96 | 118 |
| 1080p Full HD | 86 | 112 | 146 | 182 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld places heavy demands on both processor and graphics hardware, and the combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT produces a distinctive performance profile. Measured results across resolutions and presets show a system that is clearly capable of high refresh rates at standard resolutions but begins to strain under the load of 4K and maximum settings. The data indicates that this pairing is balanced, with the GPU typically becoming the primary constraint as resolution and visual fidelity increase, while the CPU provides ample headroom for physics and world simulation tasks.
FAQ
Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combo for Palworld?
A: This specific combination ranks 930th out of 1718 tested combos for Palworld, placing it in the middle of the pack among all tested hardware pairings.
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13400F compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.5% ahead of both the AMD EPYC 9474F and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340. It sits 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D.
Q: What is the best resolution for achieving a 60+ FPS average with this combo?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 and 1920x1080 resolutions both achieve averages above 58 FPS across all tested settings, while 3840x2160 only exceeds 60 FPS on the Low preset.
Q: How much performance difference is there between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces an average of 182.3 FPS, while the Ultra preset produces 86.4 FPS. This represents a reduction of approximately 95.9 FPS when moving from Low to Ultra.
Q: Does the GPU benchmark data suggest it is a strong performer relative to other cards?
A: The Radeon RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721 and sits in the 77th percentile of all GPUs. It scores 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A5000.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Palworld?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 182.3, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT sits at rank 930 out of 1718 tested combinations for Palworld. This middle-tier placement is informative, as it suggests that while the individual components are competent, the pairing does not break into the upper echelon of performance for this specific title. The i5-13400F itself holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with a strong average benchmark score of 25236, indicating it is a high-performing processor in general workloads. The GPU, meanwhile, sits in the 77th percentile of all GPUs, which is also above average but not flagship territory.
The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles is small, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component is drastically holding back the other. However, the specific demands of Palworld, which often involves complex world interactions and many on-screen entities, can shift the bottleneck. The benchmark results indicate that at lower resolutions, the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21279) is sufficient to keep pace, but at higher resolutions, the GPU's raw throughput becomes the limiting factor. This is a classic configuration where the system behaves well within its design envelope, offering a consistent experience without a severe imbalance between the two primary components.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for different priorities. For players targeting the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset at 1920x1080 delivers an average of 182.3 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors. However, this comes at the cost of visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 1920x1080 offers a significant jump in visual quality for a modest performance hit, delivering an average of 146.3 FPS. This is arguably the sweet spot for 1080p, providing a high frame rate while maintaining acceptable graphical standards.
At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves an average of 76.1 FPS, which is generally comfortable for most players. This resolution and preset combination appears to be the most balanced for a premium visual experience without sacrificing smoothness. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 58.4 FPS, which is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced action. For 4K gaming, the data suggests that only the Low preset (67.7 FPS) maintains a playable frame rate, while Medium (57 FPS) and High (39.4 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K yields a mere 33.6 FPS, making it unsuitable for a smooth experience. Based on the measured rows, the Medium preset at 1080p or the High preset at 1440p provides the best balance of performance and visual quality.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The FPS measurements reveal a clear and consistent scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its full potential, with the Low preset achieving 182.3 FPS and the Medium preset hitting 146.3 FPS. Moving to High yields 111.7 FPS, and the Ultra preset brings the average down to 86.4 FPS. This shows a smooth progression of performance drop as graphical demands increase, with a total range of 95.9 FPS between the lowest and highest settings.
At 2560x1440, the same trend continues but with lower absolute numbers. The Low preset produces 117.8 FPS, which is still very high, while Medium drops to 95.9 FPS. High settings yield 76.1 FPS, and Ultra lowers the average to 58.4 FPS. The performance hit from increasing resolution is evident; for example, the High preset drops from 111.7 FPS at 1080p to 76.1 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 35.6 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system is clearly under significant strain. The Low preset is the only one that breaks the 60 FPS barrier at 67.7 FPS. Medium falls to 57 FPS, while High drops to 39.4 FPS. The Ultra preset is nearly unplayable at 33.6 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe, particularly on the High preset, which drops by 36.7 FPS. This data confirms that 4K gaming is only viable with significant compromises on visual quality for this hardware combination.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT plays a pivotal role in determining the system's performance ceiling in Palworld, especially as resolution increases. The GPU is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for the textures and geometry typical of survival games, but the 4K results suggest it is not enough to maintain high frame rates at maximum settings.
The GPU's core clocks are high, with a base clock of 2321 MHz and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, along with a game clock of 2424 MHz. This allows for substantial compute throughput, rated at 13.21 TFLOPS FP32. However, the measured FPS data indicates that this raw power is not sufficient to handle the Ultra preset at 4K, where the average falls to 33.6 FPS. The GPU's 40 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate are present, but Palworld's primary rendering load appears to be on traditional rasterization, where the card performs more predictably.
The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its position as a strong mid-range performer. Its Passmark G3D score is 19786, and it holds a 77th percentile ranking. In comparisons, it sits very close to the AMD Radeon RX 6800, scoring 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000, scoring 1.3% higher. This suggests that in synthetic tests, the RX 6700 XT is a capable competitor. In the context of Palworld, the data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (with a Passmark multithread score of 25032) is not fully utilized when the GPU is saturated. The VRAM capacity of 12 GB appears adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the performance drop at 4K points to a combination of memory bandwidth and compute limitations rather than a simple capacity issue.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 67.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 57.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 39.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 117.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 95.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 76.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 58.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 182.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 146.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 111.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 86.4 |
Palworld with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-13400F + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.