Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
182
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 182 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 64 85 110 136
1440p QHD 115 153 199 246
1080p Full HD 176 233 301 367

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 85
3840x2160 Medium 110
3840x2160 Low 136
2560x1440 Ultra 115
2560x1440 High 153
2560x1440 Medium 199
2560x1440 Low 246
1920x1080 Ultra 176
1920x1080 High 233
1920x1080 Medium 301
1920x1080 Low 367

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld’s measured performance with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combo places it at rank 1922 out of 2944 tested configurations. This mid-pack positioning indicates a system that delivers playable frame rates at mainstream resolutions, but requires careful settings management to maintain smooth gameplay at higher fidelity levels. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions, with the combination of this 16-core processor and 8 GB graphics card producing results that scale predictably from 1080p to 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Palworld?

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 provides the most consistent experience, with average frame rates ranging from 74 FPS at Ultra settings to 156 FPS at Low settings. At 2560x1440, averages drop to between 48 FPS and 103 FPS, while 3840x2160 produces averages between 27 FPS and 57 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: According to the benchmark data, the RTX 5060’s average benchmark score of 26331 is 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon 860M and 0.3% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550. It sits 0.8% below the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary and 1.2% above the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance relative to its closest competitors?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX achieves an average benchmark score of 76212, which places it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D. It trails the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 0.4% each.

Q: Does the combo perform better at High or Medium settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers an average of 64 FPS, while the Medium preset produces 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 96 FPS. The Medium setting offers a substantial improvement in average frame rate and includes measured minimum and maximum values for stability assessment.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM capacity sufficient for Palworld at 4K?

A: The measured results at 3840x2160 show playable averages at Low settings with 57 FPS, but Ultra settings drop to 27 FPS. The data suggests the GPU’s memory configuration becomes a limiting factor at higher presets, as the average frame rate falls by more than half from Low to Ultra.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread results?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 6030 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 42713 in multi-core, while PassMark single-thread testing yields 3907 and multithread testing yields 51405. These results indicate strong scaling across the 16 cores, with multi-thread scores approximately seven times higher than single-thread scores in Cinebench R23.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1922 out of 2944 tested combinations places it in the lower-middle segment of the database. This positioning reflects the balance between the RTX 5060’s modest standing among GPUs and the Ryzen 9 8945HX’s stronger processor ranking. The GPU’s percentile of 72 among all GPUs suggests it outperforms roughly a quarter of the graphics cards tested, while the CPU’s percentile of 95 indicates it sits among the top 5% of processors.

The disparity between CPU and GPU percentiles explains the combo’s overall rank. The processor is a high-end mobile part capable of feeding even demanding games, but the graphics card’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus width constrain performance at higher resolutions. In Palworld specifically, the measured frame rates show that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck when settings are increased, particularly at 4K where the Ultra preset averages only 27 FPS.

Compared to the GPU’s nearest rivals, the RTX 5060’s average benchmark score of 26331 places it within 1.2% of competing products, indicating that the graphics card is not an outlier in either direction. The CPU’s nearest rivals show a similar tight grouping, with the Ryzen 9 8945HX scoring within 0.6% of four competing processors. This suggests that the combo’s rank is more influenced by the GPU’s limitations at high settings than by any deficiency in processing power.

The gap between the combo’s rank and the CPU’s high percentile underscores the importance of pairing balanced components. While the 8945HX provides ample compute resources for Palworld’s simulation and physics workloads, the RTX 5060’s memory subsystem and raw throughput cap the achievable frame rates at higher quality presets.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data indicates that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 126 FPS on average with a minimum of 107 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440, Medium produces 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS, which remains playable on standard 60 Hz displays and approaches the 75 Hz refresh rate common on mid-range monitors.

The High preset at 1440p produces 64 FPS on average, which falls below the 70 FPS minimum observed on the Medium preset. This suggests that High settings introduce frame time variability that could cause noticeable stuttering during intense gameplay sequences. At 4K, the Medium preset averages 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 FPS, which is playable but may require adaptive sync technology to avoid visible tearing.

For users prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, the Low preset at 1080p achieves 156 FPS, which is suitable for high-refresh-rate displays. However, the step from Low to Medium costs only 30 FPS on average while likely providing significant visual improvements in texture detail and shadow quality. The Ultra preset should be avoided at all resolutions, as it produces average frame rates below 75 FPS even at 1080p and drops to 27 FPS at 4K.

The data suggests that Medium at 1440p provides the most balanced experience, offering a 30% improvement over High settings while maintaining frame rates above 70 FPS. At 1080p, Medium is the recommended preset for users who want to maximize visual quality while preserving a smooth experience, as the 126 FPS average leaves headroom for demanding scenes.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset averages 156 FPS, representing the highest measured frame rate in the dataset. Medium follows at 126 FPS with a minimum of 107 FPS and a maximum of 145 FPS, demonstrating consistent frame pacing. High settings drop to 97 FPS on average, while Ultra falls to 74 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 53% reduction in average frame rate, indicating that the GPU’s capabilities are increasingly taxed as quality increases.

The 2560x1440 results show a similar pattern with reduced absolute values. Low settings average 103 FPS, which is 34% lower than the 1080p result. Medium averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS and maximum of 96 FPS, maintaining the same 21 FPS spread between minimum and maximum as observed at 1080p. High drops to 64 FPS on average, while Ultra falls to 48 FPS. The performance gap between Medium and High at 1440p is 19 FPS, slightly narrower than the 29 FPS gap observed at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher presets. Low settings average 57 FPS, which is the only 4K preset exceeding 60 FPS. Medium averages 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 FPS and maximum of 53 FPS, showing a 14 FPS range between minimum and maximum. High drops to 35 FPS on average, while Ultra falls to 27 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 30 FPS, representing a 53% reduction in performance.

The frame rate data reveals that the Medium preset provides the most stable experience across resolutions, with consistent minimum-to-maximum spreads of 38 FPS at 1080p, 25 FPS at 1440p, and 14 FPS at 4K. The narrowing spread at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU becomes more consistently saturated, reducing frame time variance but also lowering overall performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz, and it contains 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. These specifications position the card as a mid-range mobile solution, with a PassMark G3D score of 20891 and a percentile ranking of 72 among all GPUs.

In Palworld, the GPU’s 8 GB memory capacity appears to be a limiting factor at higher resolutions and presets. The measured frame rates at 4K show a dramatic drop from 57 FPS at Low to 27 FPS at Ultra, a 53% reduction that suggests the memory subsystem is overwhelmed by the increased texture and geometry data required at Ultra settings. The 128-bit bus width, combined with the 8 GB capacity, limits the card’s ability to handle the memory footprint of high-quality assets at 4K resolutions.

The GPU’s synthetic benchmark scores indicate moderate compute capability relative to its peers. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787 place the card in a competitive position, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 77 suggests potential driver or architecture limitations in certain workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26331 is within 1.2% of its nearest rivals, indicating that the card performs as expected for its class.

The relationship between the GPU’s specifications and Palworld’s measured performance shows that the card is well-suited for 1080p gaming at Medium to High settings. At 1440p, the Medium preset’s 83 FPS average demonstrates that the card can handle the resolution with appropriate settings, but the 4K results reveal that the GPU is not designed for ultra-high-resolution gaming with this title.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The CPU’s 64 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support provide ample bandwidth for gaming workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 and single-core score of 6030 demonstrate strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks.

In Palworld, the CPU’s role is likely to handle the game’s simulation and world-generation workloads, which can benefit from multiple cores. The 8945HX’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide substantial parallelism for these tasks, and its PassMark multithread score of 51405 indicates robust multi-core performance. The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 6030 and PassMark single-thread score of 3907, ensures that the processor does not become a bottleneck in scenarios where Palworld’s main thread is the limiting factor.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 95 among all CPUs places it in the top 5% of processors tested, and its average benchmark score of 76212 is within 0.6% of its nearest rivals. This close grouping with competing high-end processors suggests that the 8945HX provides comparable performance to other top-tier mobile CPUs, making it unlikely to be the primary constraint on frame rates in Palworld.

The measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 156 FPS, which is likely approaching the CPU’s limit for this game. However, the fact that frame rates drop significantly when moving to higher resolutions and settings indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting component as graphical demands increase. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores suggest it can adequately feed the RTX 5060 in most scenarios, with the GPU’s memory and compute limitations becoming more apparent at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 156 FPS at 1080p to 103 FPS at 1440p to 57 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 45% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The cumulative reduction from 1080p to 4K is 63%, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed by the increased pixel count.

At Medium settings, the scaling follows a similar trajectory: 126 FPS at 1080p, 83 FPS at 1440p, and 46 FPS at 4K. The reductions are 34% and 45% respectively, matching the Low preset’s scaling pattern. This consistency suggests that the GPU’s performance scales predictably with resolution, and the limiting factor remains the graphics card rather than the CPU.

The High and Ultra presets show slightly different scaling behavior. High settings produce 97 FPS at 1080p, 64 FPS at 1440p, and 35 FPS at 4K, representing reductions of 34% and 45%. Ultra settings yield 74 FPS at 1080p, 48 FPS at 1440p, and 27 FPS at 4K, with reductions of 35% and 44%. The similarity in scaling across all four presets indicates that the GPU is consistently the bottleneck at every resolution and quality level.

The CPU’s role in this scaling can be inferred from the absolute frame rates at 1080p Low, which reach 156 FPS. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see frame rates plateau at lower resolutions rather than scale linearly with pixel count. The fact that frame rates continue to increase as resolution decreases suggests that the GPU remains the primary constraint even at 1080p, and the CPU has sufficient headroom to support higher frame rates if the GPU were more capable. This pattern confirms that the RTX 5060 is the component that determines Palworld’s performance ceiling for this combo, with the Ryzen 9 8945HX providing ample processing power to avoid becoming a limiting factor.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket AMD Socket FL1
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2497 MHz MHz
TDP 145 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Ultra 64.0
3840x2160 High 85.0
3840x2160 Medium 110.0
3840x2160 Low 136.0
2560x1440 Ultra 115.0
2560x1440 High 153.0
2560x1440 Medium 199.0
2560x1440 Low 246.0
1920x1080 Ultra 176.0
1920x1080 High 233.0
1920x1080 Medium 301.0
1920x1080 Low 367.0

Palworld with Ryzen 9 8945HX + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 8945HX + RTX 5060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.