Palworld
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 156 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 72 | 94 | 116 |
| 1440p QHD | 99 | 130 | 169 | 209 |
| 1080p Full HD | 150 | 198 | 257 | 318 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld pairs a 12-core AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, a combination that delivers a wide spread of framerates depending on how aggressively you push the settings. The measured data shows this combo ranks 247th out of 3711 tested configurations, placing it comfortably in the top tier for this survival title. Across all resolutions, the RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and Ada Lovelace architecture provide ample headroom, while the CPU's 12 Zen 4 cores keep up with the game's simulation demands. The result is a system that can handle everything from competitive low-setting play to visually rich Ultra presets, though the latter comes with a significant performance cost.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows reveal a clear hierarchy across the four available presets, and the optimal choice depends heavily on your target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset produces an average of 198 FPS, which is already well beyond what most high-refresh monitors can display. However, the Low preset jumps to 318 FPS, a massive 60% improvement over High, making it the obvious pick for esports-style play or for users with 240Hz+ displays who want to maximize input responsiveness. The Medium preset sits at 257 FPS, offering a balance between visual fidelity and speed, but the jump from Medium to High is steep — a 23% drop from 257 to 198 FPS — suggesting that High's additional effects are costly relative to their visual return at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the calculus shifts. The High preset delivers 130 FPS, which is still excellent for most gaming monitors and provides a substantial visual upgrade over Low's 209 FPS. Medium lands at 169 FPS, and the step from Medium to High costs roughly 23% performance again, but the absolute value remains above 120 FPS. For 1440p users with 144Hz panels, High is the recommended preset because it holds above the refresh threshold while offering the best image quality in that range. Ultra, at 99 FPS, is playable but dips below the 100 FPS mark, making it a choice for users who prioritize visuals over smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more constrained. High produces 72 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS console-like target but not ideal for fast-paced action. Medium, at 94 FPS, is the sweet spot for 4K — it stays well above 60 FPS with a comfortable margin, and the drop from Medium to High is 23%, from 94 to 72 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K, at 55 FPS, falls below 60 and is only recommended for players who demand maximum visual quality and can tolerate occasional dips. Low at 4K, at 116 FPS, is surprisingly playable and suggests that the RTX 4080 has enough raw power to brute-force this game even at high pixel counts. Overall, Medium at 4K and High at 1440p offer the best balance of image quality and frame rate, while Low at 1080p is the performance king for competitive play.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications explain the observed framerate patterns. The GPU features a 2205 MHz base clock and a 2505 MHz boost clock, with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is crucial for Palworld, a game that can easily consume large amounts of VRAM at high resolutions and Ultra settings. The 16 GB capacity ensures that even at 4K Ultra, the card does not run into memory ceilings, which would cause stuttering or texture pop-in. The 9728 shading units and 76 RT cores provide the compute throughput needed for the game's lighting and effects, though Palworld is not particularly ray-tracing heavy compared to other modern titles.
The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its position. It achieves a Passmark G3D score of 34457, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 54247 is nearly identical to the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209, a delta of just 0.1% — the two cards are effectively neck-and-neck in synthetic tests. This parity explains why the measured FPS numbers are so high; the 4080 is operating at the top of the current GPU hierarchy. The card's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 761.5 GTexel/s texture rate are more than sufficient to feed the 112 ROPs at high resolutions.
The data shows a clear GPU-bound trend as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the system hits 318 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's practical limit for this game's engine. As you move to 1440p and 4K, the FPS drops in a pattern that tracks the pixel count increase, confirming that the RTX 4080 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The card's 320W TDP and triple-slot cooler design indicate it is a high-power part, but the measured performance justifies the power draw. For Palworld specifically, the GPU's strength lies in its ability to maintain high framerates at 1440p High and 4K Medium, which are the settings where the visual-to-performance tradeoff is most favorable.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 9 7900X and RTX 4080 achieves a combo rank of 247 out of 3711 tested systems in Palworld, placing it in the top 6.7% of all configurations. This rank reflects the synergy between a high-end 12-core CPU and a flagship-tier GPU, and the data suggests that this pairing is well-balanced for this title. The CPU's average benchmark score of 53288 is within 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206) and 0.6% of the Intel Xeon 634 (52974), while being slightly behind the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620) by 0.6%. These margins are negligible in gaming scenarios, meaning the 7900X is not the bottleneck in most situations.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4080's average score of 54247 puts it 0.1% ahead of the RTX 4080 SUPER and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X. The gap to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is larger at 2.6%, but that card is a lower-tier product. The 4080's percentile rank of 86 among all GPUs confirms that it is a top-15% part, and when paired with a CPU that ranks in the 91st percentile, the combination is expected to perform well. The rank of 247 suggests that there are 246 faster combos, likely featuring the RTX 4090 or newer 50-series cards, but for a 4080-based system, this is a strong showing.
The measured FPS data aligns with this ranking. At 1440p High, the combo produces 130 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS standard and competitive with systems that rank higher. The fact that this combo achieves 318 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU enough frames to saturate even the fastest displays. The rank of 247 reflects the 4080's efficiency — it delivers near-4090 performance in many scenarios while being a more reasonable physical package. For Palworld, this combo is overkill for 1080p but hits a sweet spot at 1440p and remains viable at 4K with adjusted settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system starts at 318 FPS on Low, drops to 257 FPS on Medium, 198 FPS on High, and bottoms out at 150 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset includes minimum and maximum figures of 219 and 296 FPS, respectively, indicating a smooth frame delivery with a 77 FPS spread between the 1% lows and highs. High and Ultra do not have min/max data, but the averages suggest that the GPU is still not fully stressed at this resolution — the CPU is likely the limiting factor at Low.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 209 FPS on Low, 169 FPS on Medium, 130 FPS on High, and 99 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 195 FPS, which is a tighter range than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is beginning to take on more load. The drop from Low to Medium is 19%, from Medium to High is 23%, and from High to Ultra is 24%. These consistent percentage drops suggest that each preset tier adds a similar amount of graphical work, and the GPU scales predictably as resolution increases.
At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit. Low averages 116 FPS, Medium averages 94 FPS, High averages 72 FPS, and Ultra averages 55 FPS. The Medium preset has a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 108 FPS, which means the frame time variance is more pronounced at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K on High is 44% (from 130 to 72 FPS), while on Medium it is 44% as well (from 169 to 94 FPS). This consistent 44% reduction across presets indicates that the GPU is being pushed harder at 4K, and the 16 GB VRAM is working to keep up with the increased texture and geometry loads. Ultra at 4K drops below 60 FPS, which is a notable threshold for smooth gameplay, and the 55 FPS average suggests that users should avoid this preset unless they have a VRR display.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the bottleneck in this system. At Low settings, the framerate drops from 318 FPS at 1080p to 209 FPS at 1440p (a 34% reduction) and then to 116 FPS at 4K (a 44% reduction from 1440p). This pattern shows that at Low settings, the CPU is still able to feed the GPU enough data to keep it busy, but the GPU's pixel processing power becomes the limiting factor as resolution climbs. The fact that 1080p Low hits 318 FPS suggests the CPU is near its practical limit for this game's engine, as higher FPS would require more single-threaded performance than the 7900X can provide.
At High settings, the scaling is more pronounced. The system delivers 198 FPS at 1080p, 130 FPS at 1440p (a 34% drop), and 72 FPS at 4K (a 45% drop from 1440p). This consistent ~34-45% reduction per resolution step indicates a GPU-bound scenario at High settings, where the RTX 4080's compute and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints. The 4K High result of 72 FPS is particularly telling — it is only 22% higher than the 4K Medium result of 94 FPS, suggesting that the High preset's additional effects (likely shadows and post-processing) disproportionately impact the GPU at higher pixel counts.
The scaling data also shows that the GPU is not fully utilized at 1080p. The difference between Low (318 FPS) and Ultra (150 FPS) at 1080p is 53%, which is a massive range that indicates the CPU can handle even the heaviest settings at this resolution. However, at 4K, the difference between Low (116 FPS) and Ultra (55 FPS) is also 53%, showing that the GPU's relative performance drop is consistent regardless of resolution. This means that the RTX 4080 is the primary bottleneck at 4K, while at 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor at lower settings. The 7900X's 12 cores and 24 threads are sufficient for Palworld's simulation, but the game's engine appears to have a single-threaded ceiling around 318 FPS.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X plays a supporting role in this combo, but its specifications are crucial for maintaining high framerates at lower resolutions. The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. This high boost clock is essential for single-threaded performance, which is where the game's main thread often bottlenecks. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for the game's world streaming and entity management.
In synthetic benchmarks, the 7900X achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29300 and a single-core score of 2016.5, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 53288 is nearly identical to the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206), a server chip with similar core counts, and within 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620). These numbers indicate that the 7900X is a top-tier consumer processor, but its gaming performance is more dependent on the boost clock than the core count. Palworld, being an early-access survival game, likely uses a limited number of threads, so the 12 cores are more about headroom for background tasks than direct FPS gains.
The measured FPS data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1440p or 4K, where the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. However, at 1080p Low, the system hits 318 FPS, which is likely close to the engine's maximum frame rate regardless of CPU. The 7900X's single-thread score of 1093 in 3DMark and 4238 in Passmark single-thread suggest that it has enough instruction throughput to drive the RTX 4080 at high framerates. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is particularly important for Palworld, as the game's physics and AI calculations often run on a single thread. The CPU's 170W TDP and 5nm process node ensure that it can sustain these boost clocks without thermal throttling, which is critical for long gaming sessions. In summary, the 7900X provides a solid foundation for the RTX 4080, ensuring that it is never starved for data, while the GPU handles the heavy lifting at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 116.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 94.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 209.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 169.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 130.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 99.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 318.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 257.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 198.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 150.0 |
Palworld with Ryzen 9 7900X + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + RTX 4080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.