Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 94 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 43 | 56 | 70 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 78 | 102 | 126 |
| 1080p Full HD | 90 | 119 | 155 | 191 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a highly capable Palworld experience, firmly establishing itself in the upper echelon of tested configurations. The data indicates that this combo ranks in the 1311th position out of 2944 tested combos, placing it in the top half of all systems. This pairing leverages an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor with 32 MB of shared L3 cache to feed a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 graphics card, resulting in a system that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The benchmark results reveal a clear performance hierarchy, with the combination favoring high refresh rate 1080p and 1440p gameplay while maintaining playability at 4K.
FAQ
Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in Palworld?
A: The combo ranks 1311th out of 2944 tested combinations. This placement indicates that the system performs better than the majority of tested setups, though it is not at the very top tier. The data suggests a balanced pairing that handles the game’s demands effectively.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its closest CPU rivals in general benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996. It is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which scores 69875, a delta of 0.2%. It sits slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, which scores 69515, a delta of 0.7%. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, putting the 9700F behind by -0.2%, and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355, which the 9700F leads by 0.9%.
Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo, and at what settings?
A: The highest average frame rate is 191 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This demonstrates the system’s ability to hit very high refresh rates when graphical load is minimized. The 1080p Medium preset also delivers a high 155 FPS average.
Q: Is the RX 7700’s performance more comparable to a modern mid-range card or an older enthusiast card?
A: According to the nearest rival data, the RX 7700’s average benchmark score is 15852. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a close competitor with a score of 16014, a delta of -1%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, also a close comparison, with a delta of -1.7%. It also matches the older AMD Radeon R9 370X, which scores 15862.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the measured data, and under what conditions?
A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 33 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. The data also includes a min FPS of 48 for 4K Medium settings and a min FPS of 87 for 1440p Medium settings. The 1080p Medium preset shows a min FPS of 131.
Q: Does the CPU’s single-thread performance suggest it is a bottleneck in this game?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has a PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and a percentile ranking of 94 against all CPUs. This high single-thread score suggests it is unlikely to be a limiting factor in Palworld, allowing the GPU to be the primary driver of frame rates. The data shows that frame rates scale well with resolution, further indicating a GPU-bound scenario.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the primary driver of frame rates in this Palworld configuration. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a substantial 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that proves crucial for storing and accessing the game’s textures and geometry. The GPU’s architecture, RDNA 3.0, with 2560 shading units, is tasked with rendering the vibrant world. The clocks show a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz, which indicates the card’s dynamic performance range.
The benchmark results show a clear pattern where the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions. For instance, at 4K Ultra, the system averages only 33 FPS, while at 4K Low, it reaches 70 FPS. This 37 FPS swing is a direct consequence of the GPU’s workload. The data suggests that the 16 GB VRAM buffer is sufficient for the game’s demands, as even at the highest settings, the performance drop is due to compute and fill-rate limits rather than memory capacity. The card’s PassMark G3D score of 20974 and its 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs place it in a solid mid-range position.
The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, show that the RX 7700 is competing in a familiar performance tier. The delta of -1.7% against the RTX 3060 Ti in average benchmark scores indicates that the two cards are closely matched. This context is important when interpreting the Palworld results; the RX 7700 is delivering performance that is expected of its class. The 40 RT cores are present for ray tracing, but the game’s measured results do not specifically isolate that feature, so its impact is not directly quantifiable here. The data points to a GPU that is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring settings adjustments to maintain smooth frame rates.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F serves as the backbone of this system, ensuring that the GPU is fed with data efficiently. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, the CPU provides ample processing power for Palworld’s simulation and AI tasks. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz allow it to handle both multi-threaded workloads and single-threaded game logic effectively. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant resource, helping to reduce latency and improve data access for the CPU cores.
The processor’s PassMark multi-thread score of 36470 and single-thread score of 4691 demonstrate strong performance in both areas. The single-thread score is particularly relevant for gaming, as it often dictates the minimum frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios. In this data set, the CPU’s influence is most visible at lower resolutions. For example, the gap between 1080p Low (191 FPS) and 1440p Low (126 FPS) is a 65 FPS drop, which is a larger percentage drop than the transition from 1440p to 4K. This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is working harder to keep up with the GPU’s high frame output.
The nearest rival data for the CPU shows it is in a tight race with other high-end processors. Its average score of 69996 is only 0.2% away from the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, indicating the 9700F is a top-tier performer. The 0.7% lead over the Ryzen 9 7950X is also noteworthy. This level of performance ensures that the CPU is not a significant bottleneck in Palworld, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of visual quality and resolution scaling. The 65W TDP reflects the efficiency of the 4nm process, delivering high performance without excessive power draw.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s resolution and performance targets. For 1920x1080, the High preset is the best choice for a balance of visual quality and performance, delivering an average of 119 FPS. The Medium preset is also excellent, offering 155 FPS for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. The Ultra preset, while visually demanding, still provides a playable 90 FPS average, but the jump from High to Ultra results in a 29 FPS loss, which may not be justifiable for the visual improvement.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the sweet spot, achieving 78 FPS average. This provides a smooth and detailed experience on higher-resolution monitors. The Medium preset offers a more fluid experience at 102 FPS, which is preferable for fast-paced gameplay. The Ultra preset drops to 59 FPS, which is playable but shows the system’s limits at this resolution. The Low preset at 1440p yields 126 FPS. For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point, with an average of 56 FPS and a min FPS of 48, which is the only 4K preset with a recorded min FPS. The High preset at 4K produces 43 FPS, while Low produces 70 FPS, but the visual sacrifices are significant.
The data suggests that the "best experience" is found on the High preset at 1080p and 1440p. This preset provides a strong balance, avoiding the diminishing returns of Ultra while maintaining a high level of graphical fidelity. For 4K, the Medium preset is the only viable option that holds a reasonable frame rate, as the Ultra preset at 33 FPS is likely too choppy for most users. The measured min FPS values of 48 at 4K Medium, 87 at 1440p Medium, and 131 at 1080p Medium highlight the stability of the Medium preset across all resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The Ryzen 7 9700F and RX 7700 combination ranks 1311th out of 2944 tested combos in Palworld. This ranking places the system in the 55th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms more than half of the other combinations. The data indicates that this is a balanced pairing, with neither component drastically holding back the other. The CPU’s high percentile ranking of 94 among all CPUs contrasts with the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking, suggesting that the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in this system.
This ranking is a direct result of the measured FPS data. While the CPU can deliver a single-thread score of 4691, the GPU’s performance in the 58th percentile keeps the overall combo from reaching the top tiers. The nearest rival data for the GPU shows it is comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti, which is a well-known mid-range card. This positioning means that the combo is not a high-end enthusiast setup, but rather a very capable mid-range to upper-mid-range system. The 1311th rank out of 2944 combos is a solid result, indicating that users of this hardware can expect a good experience in Palworld, particularly at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the system’s performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is clearly capable of high refresh rates. The Low preset averages 191 FPS, Medium averages 155 FPS with a min of 131 and max of 178, High averages 119 FPS, and Ultra averages 90 FPS. This shows a linear progression, with each step up in quality costing about 30-40 FPS on average.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain impressive but show a noticeable drop. The Low preset averages 126 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS with a min of 87 and max of 117, High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra averages 59 FPS. The performance is still very playable at this resolution, with the High preset offering a smooth experience. At 3840x2160, the system starts to struggle with the highest settings. The Low preset averages 70 FPS, Medium averages 56 FPS with a min of 48 and max of 65, High averages 43 FPS, and Ultra averages 33 FPS. The 4K results show that the GPU is heavily taxed, with only the Low preset maintaining a comfortable frame rate.
The data reveals a consistent pattern: the Medium preset offers the most stable performance, as it is the only one with recorded min and max FPS values across all resolutions. The lack of min/max data for other presets suggests that the frame pacing might be less consistent, but the average scores provide a clear performance baseline.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is significant, and it illustrates the relationship between resolution and the GPU’s workload. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 191 at 1080p to 126 at 1440p, a 34% decrease, and then to 70 at 4K, a further 44% decrease from 1440p. This scaling shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as reducing the pixel count dramatically increases the frame rate.
At Medium settings, the drop from 155 FPS at 1080p to 102 FPS at 1440p is a 34% decrease, and then to 56 FPS at 4K is a 45% decrease from 1440p. The pattern of a roughly 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 45% drop from 1440p to 4K holds true for the High preset as well (119 to 78, and 78 to 43). This consistent scaling indicates a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU’s performance is sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s demands at all resolutions.
The data implies that the CPU is not a limiting factor in this game. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would not drop as dramatically with increasing resolution. Instead, the frame rate scales almost inversely with the number of pixels, which is a classic sign of a GPU-limited system. The 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 9700F has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates, and the limiting factor is the RX 7700’s rendering capabilities. This analysis suggests that users with this CPU could upgrade to a more powerful GPU in the future and see a substantial performance increase in Palworld, as the CPU would not hold the new GPU back.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F
AMD Radeon RX 7700
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 70.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 102.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 78.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 59.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 191.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 119.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 90.0 |
Palworld with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 7700 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RX 7700
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.