Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 38 | 50 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 69 | 89 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 79 | 104 | 136 | 167 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers a solid, if not spectacular, experience in Palworld, landing in the 58th percentile of all tested system pairings. This mid-pack placement indicates a balanced platform that prioritizes consistent frame delivery over extreme high-end performance, making it a dependable choice for the survival genre's demanding open-world environments.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 2149 out of 3711 tested combinations places it squarely in the middle of the pack, a positioning that reflects the hardware's respective standings in the broader benchmark ecosystem. The RTX 2070 SUPER sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 7 5800X achieves an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs, suggesting that the graphics card is the more limiting factor in this pairing for Palworld. This dynamic is common in GPU-bound titles, where the processor's headroom cannot fully compensate for the graphics card's throughput ceiling. The data indicates a system that avoids severe bottlenecks; the 8-core, 16-thread processor provides ample compute resources, while the GPU delivers respectable frame rates without reaching the heights of more modern architectures. When examining the GPU's nearest rivals, the performance gap is narrow: the Quadro M4000M sits just 1% behind, the RTX 3070 Mobile trails by 1.2%, and both the Intel Arc B570 and Arc A750 are 1.3% and 1.5% behind respectively. This clustering shows that the 2070 SUPER is competitive within its performance tier, though it lacks the substantial uplift seen in newer generations. For the CPU, the Ryzen 7 5800X trades blows with its closest competitors: it edges out the Core Ultra 5 135H by a mere 0.1%, falls 0.4% short of the Xeon Phi 7210, and trails the Core i5-13500HX by 0.5%, while leading the Ryzen 5 5600XT by 0.6%. These negligible deltas confirm that the processor is well-positioned for its launch generation, offering performance that remains relevant against newer mobile and desktop parts.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective, which proves adequate for Palworld's texture-heavy environments at most settings. The GPU's base clock of 1605 MHz boosts to 1770 MHz, driving 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The Turing architecture provides 40 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, though Palworld's implementation does not heavily leverage ray tracing, making the standard rasterization performance the primary metric. The GPU achieves 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and a pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s, figures that align with its mid-range positioning. In benchmark tests, the card scores 18,169 in Passmark's G3D test and 1,651 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 7,557. The VRAM capacity becomes a limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings, where the average frame rate drops to 29 FPS, suggesting memory pressure or shader complexity overwhelms the 8 GB frame buffer. However, at lower settings and resolutions, the GPU scales effectively, indicating that the memory subsystem is sufficient for the game's typical play scenarios. The 12 nm process node from TSMC, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, contributes to a 215 W TDP, requiring a dual-slot cooler and both a 6-pin and 8-pin power connector.
FAQ
Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in overall GPU performance?
A: The RTX 2070 SUPER's average benchmark score of 20,282 places it within a tight competitive band. It trails the Quadro M4000M by 1%, the RTX 3070 Mobile by 1.2%, and both the Intel Arc B570 and Arc A750 by 1.3% and 1.5% respectively, showing a nearly four-way tie at this performance level.
Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded capability relative to single-threaded performance?
A: The Ryzen 7 5800X shows significant scaling with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the 16-thread score of 7,586 is nearly four times the 2-thread score of 1,846, while Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,476) is roughly ten times the single-core score (1,574.5), indicating strong multi-threading efficiency.
Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 1440p in Palworld?
A: Yes, at 1440p, the Medium preset achieves 89 FPS average with minimums of 76 FPS, and the High preset delivers 69 FPS. Low settings push to 110 FPS, but Ultra drops to 52 FPS, so a stable 60 FPS experience requires Medium or High settings.
Q: What is the highest resolution where this combo can play at Ultra settings?
A: At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 79 FPS, but at 1440p Ultra it falls to 52 FPS, and at 4K Ultra it drops to 29 FPS. The 1080p Ultra setting is the highest resolution where the Ultra preset remains playable.
Q: How does the CPU's memory bandwidth affect gaming performance?
A: The Ryzen 7 5800X supports dual-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This is sufficient for the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, and the system's overall performance in Palworld suggests memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck at the tested settings.
Q: What is the production status and market position of these components?
A: The RTX 2070 SUPER is marked as end-of-life, having been succeeded by the GeForce 30 series, while the Ryzen 7 5800X remains in active production. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking versus all CPUs indicates it outpaces the GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs.
Settings Recommendations
The measured frame rates indicate that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium delivers 136 FPS average with a minimum of 115 FPS and maximum of 156 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above high-refresh-rate monitors while maintaining better visual quality than Low. Moving to 1440p, Medium still achieves 89 FPS average with 76 FPS minimums, ensuring smooth gameplay on standard 60 Hz displays and most 144 Hz panels. At 4K, Medium produces 50 FPS average with 42 FPS minimums, which is borderline playable but may require adaptive sync to feel consistent. The High preset is a viable alternative for users prioritizing visuals over frame rate; it yields 104 FPS at 1080p and 69 FPS at 1440p, but drops to 38 FPS at 4K where it becomes too demanding. Low settings offer the highest frame rates—167 FPS at 1080p, 110 FPS at 1440p, and 61 FPS at 4K—but sacrifice too much graphical quality for most users. Ultra settings should be avoided beyond 1080p, as the 79 FPS at 1080p falls to 52 FPS at 1440p and an unplayable 29 FPS at 4K. For the best overall experience, Medium at 1440p is the recommended configuration, offering near-90 FPS performance with reasonable visual fidelity. Users with 1080p monitors can safely select High for a 104 FPS experience without compromising smoothness.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 167 FPS, representing the fastest configuration measured. Medium settings yield 136 FPS average, with a minimum of 115 FPS and maximum of 156 FPS, indicating tight frame pacing. High settings deliver 104 FPS average, while Ultra settings drop to 79 FPS average. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 88 FPS spread, illustrating the significant performance cost of higher graphical presets at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low settings achieve 110 FPS average, Medium produces 89 FPS average with 76 FPS minimums and 103 FPS maximums, and High settings maintain 69 FPS average. Ultra settings fall to 52 FPS average, making them less suitable for competitive or fast-paced gameplay. The 1440p results show that the system can handle high-refresh-rate gaming at Medium settings but struggles to maintain 60 FPS at Ultra. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes heavily strained. Low settings produce 61 FPS average, barely crossing the 60 FPS threshold, while Medium settings drop to 50 FPS average with 42 FPS minimums and 57 FPS maximums. High settings yield only 38 FPS average, and Ultra settings plummet to 29 FPS average. The 4K results clearly demonstrate the limits of this combination; users targeting 4K must accept Low or Medium settings to achieve playable frame rates. The complete data set reveals that the system scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the most significant performance cliff occurring between Medium and High at 4K, where the average frame rate drops by 12 FPS.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename, provides 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz boosts to 4.70 GHz, offering strong single-threaded performance that benefits Palworld's game logic and physics calculations. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data. In synthetic benchmarks, the processor achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 943 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,574.5, demonstrating robust per-core performance. Multi-threaded results show the CPU's scalability: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 15,476, Geekbench multi-core hits 11,036, and Passmark multi-thread scores 27,732. The 7 nm process node from TSMC, containing 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, contributes to a 105 W TDP, making it a relatively power-efficient option for the AM4 socket. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms approximately four-fifths of tested processors, positioning it well above the GPU's 65th percentile. This disparity suggests that in Palworld, the RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary constraint on frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The CPU's nearest rivals show negligible performance differences, with the Core Ultra 5 135H just 0.1% slower and the Core i5-13500HX 0.5% slower, confirming that the 5800X remains competitive against newer mobile parts. The processor supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage. Its dual-channel DDR4 memory support with ECC capability, offering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, proves sufficient for Palworld's requirements, as evidenced by the frame rates not showing signs of memory starvation. The CPU's launch MSRP was $449, and it features an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, though the data does not include overclocked results.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 61.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 110.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 167.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 136.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 104.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 79.0 |
Palworld with Ryzen 7 5800X + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 2070 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X + RTX 2070 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.