Palworld

Palworld, the survival crafting phenomenon, presents a demanding workload that scales heavily with GPU capability. This analysis examines the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the Intel Arc B370, a combination that yields playable results only at specific settings and resolutions. The data indicates a system heavily constrained by its graphics processor, particularly at higher resolutions, where frame rates fall below acceptable thresholds.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution increases, demonstrating that the Intel Arc B370 is the definitive limiting factor in this configuration. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 76 FPS, which is the highest performance point recorded. Moving to 2560x1440 at Low settings, the average drops to 50 FPS, representing a substantial 34% decrease. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average falls further to 28 FPS, a 44% drop from the 1440p figure and a 63% decline from the 1080p baseline.

This scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For instance, at Medium settings, the average FPS is 62 at 1080p, 41 at 1440p, and 23 at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K is significant, indicating that the GPU's rendering capabilities are overwhelmed by the pixel count at higher resolutions. The data suggests that the CPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, has ample headroom; the frame rate drops are directly attributable to the Intel Arc B370's inability to maintain throughput as the resolution increases.

The performance delta between 1080p and 1440p is roughly a 30-35% reduction, while moving from 1440p to 4K incurs another 40-45% reduction. This non-linear scaling implies that the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading resources become saturated quickly. The Arc B370's memory being "System Shared" and bandwidth being "System Dependent" likely contributes to this bottleneck, as the GPU must contend with system RAM for data access. For users targeting 4K gaming, the data shows that even the Low preset cannot deliver a consistently playable experience, with an average of only 28 FPS.

The implication is clear: this combination is best suited for 1080p gaming. At 1440p, only the Low preset approaches playability, and even then, it is borderline. The 4K results are universally below 30 FPS, rendering that resolution impractical for this hardware pairing in Palworld.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Palworld?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the only resolution that provides consistently playable frame rates. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 36 on Ultra to 76 on Low, with Medium and High presets hitting 62 and 47 FPS respectively.

Q: Can this system run Palworld at 4K?

A: The data indicates no. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 28 on the Low preset. The Medium preset averages 23 FPS, High averages 17 FPS, and Ultra averages 13 FPS. All of these results fall below the 30 FPS threshold generally considered the minimum for playable performance.

Q: How much of a performance drop occurs when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: The drop is significant across all settings. For example, at Low settings, the average FPS falls from 76 at 1080p to 50 at 1440p. At Medium settings, it falls from 62 to 41 FPS. This represents an approximate 30-35% reduction in frame rate.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 or the Intel Arc B370 the bottleneck here?

A: The benchmark results strongly suggest the Intel Arc B370 is the bottleneck. The frame rates scale poorly with resolution, a classic sign of GPU limitation. The CPU, which is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, is unlikely to be the limiting factor at 4K, where the GPU is clearly struggling.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 76 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves an average of 36 FPS. This is a difference of 40 FPS, or roughly 53% lower performance on Ultra compared to Low.

Q: Does the system have enough performance for High settings at 1440p?

A: The data shows an average of 31 FPS at 2560x1440 on High settings. While this is technically above 30 FPS, it is a marginal result that may not provide a consistently smooth experience in a game with frequent action and exploration.

Settings Recommendations

Given the measured data, the optimal experience for this hardware combination is found at 1920x1080. The frame rate curve at this resolution is steep but offers a clear "sweet spot." The Low preset delivers the highest average at 76 FPS, ensuring maximum smoothness. However, for a better visual experience, the Medium preset provides a significant upgrade in fidelity while still maintaining an average of 62 FPS, with a minimum frame rate of 52 FPS. This is the recommended starting point for most users, as it balances visual quality and performance.

The High preset at 1080p averages 47 FPS, which is playable but begins to show the GPU's limitations, especially in demanding scenes. The Ultra preset, averaging 36 FPS, is only suitable for players who prioritize image quality over frame rate consistency and are willing to accept occasional dips.

At 2560x1440, the choices become more constrained. The Low preset is the only option that provides a comfortable margin, averaging 50 FPS. The Medium preset at 41 FPS is acceptable, but the minimum frame rate of 35 FPS suggests potential stuttering in heavy combat or when many Pals are active. High and Ultra settings at 1440p, averaging 31 and 24 FPS respectively, are not recommended for a smooth experience.

For 4K, no settings preset is recommended. Even the Low preset's 28 FPS average is below the playability threshold, and higher presets drop into the teens. Users with a 4K display should run the game at a lower resolution to achieve acceptable performance.

The data suggests that the best "feeling" experience is 1080p Medium. It offers a 62 FPS average, which is above the standard 60 FPS target, and the minimum FPS of 52 ensures that the game remains fluid. This provides a better overall experience than 1080p Low, which, while faster, may exhibit more visual artifacts and lower detail settings. The performance cost of moving from Medium to High is a 15 FPS drop, which is substantial and indicates that the GPU is nearing its limits.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Palworld, this particular pairing ranks poorly. The combo rank in game is 2706 out of 2944 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of all results. This indicates that the vast majority of CPU and GPU pairings tested by the database deliver superior performance in this game. The low rank is almost entirely attributable to the Intel Arc B370's weak showing. The GPU's percentile vs. all GPUs is 5, meaning it performs better than only 5% of all graphics cards tested in the database's benchmark suite.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 1184, which is extremely low. Its nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark charts include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186 (a delta of -0.2%), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, which scores 1192 (a delta of -0.7%). These are legacy mobile graphics solutions, highlighting the Arc B370's lack of computational power. While the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600, is a competent processor with a percentile of 78 vs. all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 26324, it cannot compensate for the GPU's deficit.

The combination of a modern, powerful CPU with a very weak GPU results in a system that is severely imbalanced for gaming. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and the Intel Core i9-11900KF, both of which are high-end parts, yet the GPU's performance drags the entire system to the bottom of the rankings. This ranking serves as a clear indicator that the Intel Arc B370 is not suitable for demanding titles like Palworld, and the system's overall performance is defined by its weakest link.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370's role in this configuration is the primary constraint on performance. Its specifications are those of an integrated graphics processor, not a discrete gaming solution. It is based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and is fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process node. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units. Its boost clock is listed at 2400 MHz, and it has a TDP of just 25 W, which is typical for an integrated solution.

Crucially, the memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. The memory bus width and bandwidth are also listed as "System Shared" and "System Dependent," respectively. This is a severe disadvantage for a game like Palworld, which requires substantial memory bandwidth for textures and geometry. The GPU's performance metrics are low, with a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS.

These specifications directly correlate with the measured FPS. The lack of dedicated VRAM and reliance on system memory likely causes significant bottlenecks in data transfer. This explains why the performance degrades so sharply with increased resolution and settings, as the memory subsystem becomes a major limiting factor. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1184, which is a very low score, confirming its weak standing relative to other graphics solutions. The data indicates that this GPU is designed for basic display output and light workloads, not for the demands of a modern survival game with high-resolution textures and complex rendering. Its 10 RT cores are present, but the overall processing power is insufficient to leverage them effectively in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel Arc B370 combination in Palworld, as provided by the data.

1920x1080:

• Low: The average frame rate is 76 FPS. This is the highest score recorded for this combo.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 62 FPS. The minimum FPS recorded is 52, and the maximum is 71.
• High: The average frame rate is 47 FPS.
• Ultra: The average frame rate is 36 FPS.

2560x1440:

• Low: The average frame rate drops to 50 FPS.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 41 FPS. The minimum FPS is 35, and the maximum is 47.
• High: The average frame rate is 31 FPS.
• Ultra: The average frame rate falls to 24 FPS.

3840x2160:

• Low: The average frame rate is 28 FPS.
• Medium: The average frame rate is 23 FPS. The minimum FPS is 19, and the maximum is 26.
• High: The average frame rate is 17 FPS.
• Ultra: The average frame rate is 13 FPS.

The data shows a clear and consistent pattern. At each resolution, the frame rate scales inversely with the quality preset. The difference between 1080p Low and 4K Ultra is a stark 63 FPS, highlighting the extreme performance limitations of the GPU. The minimum FPS values recorded for the Medium preset at each resolution (52 at 1080p, 35 at 1440p, 19 at 4K) provide additional insight into the stability of the frame rate. While 1080p Medium maintains a playable minimum, the 1440p Medium minimum of 35 FPS is close to the edge of playability, and the 4K Medium minimum of 19 FPS confirms that this resolution is not viable. These numbers collectively paint a picture of a system that can handle the game at 1080p with a balanced preset, but struggles to maintain acceptable performance at higher resolutions or with more demanding graphical settings.