Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
178
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 178 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 87 114 140
1440p QHD 119 157 205 252
1080p Full HD 181 239 278 300

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 140
3840x2160 Medium 114
3840x2160 High 87
3840x2160 Ultra 66
2560x1440 Low 252
2560x1440 Medium 205
2560x1440 High 157
2560x1440 Ultra 119
1920x1080 Low 300
1920x1080 Medium 278
1920x1080 High 239
1920x1080 Ultra 181

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, a combination that places 61st out of 2944 tested combos in this game. The data reveals a system where the CPU consistently limits performance at lower resolutions, while the GPU’s immense power ensures playable frame rates even at 4K Ultra. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to explain how each component contributes to the final experience.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1080p with High settings, the combo averages 239 FPS. Moving to 1440p High drops that to 157 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K High, the average falls further to 87 FPS, which is 64% below the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the workload shifts from the CPU to the graphics card.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically as resolution increases. At 1080p, Low produces 300 FPS while Ultra yields 181 FPS, a difference of 119 FPS. At 1440p, the same settings spread is 252 FPS versus 119 FPS, a 133 FPS gap. At 4K, Low hits 140 FPS and Ultra drops to 66 FPS, a 74 FPS difference. The narrowing of this gap at 4K suggests that the GPU is saturated and can no longer translate higher settings into proportionally higher frame rates.

The 4K Medium result provides the only min/max data in the pack, with an average of 114 FPS, a minimum of 96 FPS, and a maximum of 131 FPS. This 35 FPS spread indicates that even at 4K, the combination can maintain a relatively stable frame delivery, though the variance is notable. The 1080p Medium result shows a similar pattern with an average of 278 FPS, a minimum of 237 FPS, and a maximum of 320 FPS, an 83 FPS range that reflects the CPU’s difficulty in keeping up with the GPU’s output at lower resolutions.

The data shows that this combo is best suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where it can push well past 144 FPS on High settings. At 4K, the system still delivers playable frame rates, but the scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings (239 to 87 FPS) represents a 64% loss, which is steeper than what a purely GPU-bound scenario would suggest. This indicates that the CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by its 872-point 3DMark single-thread score, contributes to the bottleneck at higher resolutions where the GPU’s raw power is partially wasted.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This Zen 3 architecture, built on a 7 nm process, has a 16 MB L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU’s benchmark scores place it at the 74th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 21088. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-1220P, scores 21066, a mere 0.1% difference, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112, just 0.1% ahead.

In Palworld, the CPU’s impact is most evident at 1080p, where the average FPS across all settings is 249.5. The jump from Low (300 FPS) to Medium (278 FPS) is small, but the drop to High (239 FPS) and Ultra (181 FPS) is significant. This pattern suggests that the CPU handles the game’s simulation and AI tasks well, but the GPU is waiting for the CPU to feed it data, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU’s workload is lighter. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for Palworld’s threading model, as evidenced by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 5451, which is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 5455.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, measured at 872 points in 3DMark single-thread and 1409 in Cinebench R23 single-core, is a critical factor. Palworld’s main thread likely relies on this performance, and the data shows that at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 181 FPS, which is 40% lower than the 300 FPS at Low. This suggests that the CPU’s single-thread capabilities, while adequate, cannot fully saturate the RTX 5090 D at lower resolutions when settings demand more CPU-side work. The CPU’s passmark single-thread score of 3177 reinforces this, showing a strong but not exceptional performance for its class.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while typical for DDR4, may also play a role in the scaling pattern. At 4K, the CPU is less of a factor, as the GPU’s workload dominates, but at 1080p, the CPU’s memory access patterns can influence frame delivery. The 1080p Medium min FPS of 237 and max FPS of 320, a spread of 83 FPS, indicates that the CPU’s frame pacing is not perfectly consistent, likely due to the 6-core/12-thread configuration being stressed by the game’s simulation.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU built on a 5 nm process, featuring 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. It has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and its benchmark scores place it at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 77712. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT, scores 76904, a 1.1% difference, while the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, 1.6% ahead.

In Palworld, the GPU’s role is most apparent at 4K, where it becomes the primary bottleneck. The 4K Ultra result of 66 FPS, while lower than other settings, still demonstrates the GPU’s capability to handle the game’s visuals at maximum quality. The 4K Medium result of 114 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS, shows that the GPU can maintain a playable frame rate even when the CPU is not the limiting factor. The GPU’s 32 GB of VRAM ensures that memory capacity is never an issue, even at 4K Ultra, where texture data can be substantial.

The GPU’s raw compute power, measured at 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, is more than sufficient for Palworld’s rendering needs. The texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s allow the GPU to handle high-resolution textures and effects without strain. The 680 tensor cores and 170 RT cores, while not directly relevant to Palworld’s non-ray-traced rendering, contribute to the GPU’s overall throughput. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 310674 and Vulkan score of 376915 confirm the GPU’s compute capabilities, though these are not directly reflected in the game’s frame rates.

The GPU’s performance scaling across resolutions is consistent with its capabilities. At 1080p High, the GPU delivers 239 FPS, which is only 20% lower than the Low setting’s 300 FPS. At 4K, the High setting (87 FPS) is 38% lower than Low (140 FPS), indicating that the GPU is becoming more stressed as resolution increases. The 4K Ultra result of 66 FPS is still above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, but the 114 FPS at Medium shows that the GPU has headroom to spare in most scenarios. The GPU’s 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth is likely a key factor in maintaining these frame rates, as Palworld’s open-world environments require frequent texture streaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Palworld?

A: The data shows that 1440p High provides 157 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and performance. At 1080p High, the combo reaches 239 FPS, but the CPU becomes a limiting factor, as evidenced by the 300 FPS at Low. At 4K High, the frame rate drops to 87 FPS, which is still playable but less ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1080p?

A: The CPU limits performance at 1080p, as shown by the 300 FPS at Low versus 181 FPS at Ultra. The 6-core/12-thread configuration, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 872, cannot fully saturate the GPU at lower resolutions, causing the frame rate to drop as settings increase and CPU-side work grows.

Q: Is the GPU overkill for this game?

A: The RTX 5090 D is highly capable, as shown by its 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs. In Palworld, it delivers 66 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is a demanding scenario. However, at 1080p, the CPU prevents the GPU from reaching its full potential, suggesting that the GPU is more powerful than needed for this game at lower resolutions.

Q: What is the frame rate at 4K Medium?

A: The 4K Medium setting produces an average of 114 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 131 FPS. This is the only 4K setting with min/max data, showing a 35 FPS spread that indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 61st out of 2944 tested combos in Palworld, placing it in the top 2% of all tested systems. This high ranking reflects the GPU’s strong performance, despite the CPU being a limiting factor at lower resolutions.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, Low produces 252 FPS, while Ultra yields 119 FPS, a difference of 133 FPS. This shows that the GPU handles the increased visual load well, but the CPU still plays a role, as the 119 FPS at Ultra is significantly lower than the 252 FPS at Low.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests that the High preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p High, the combo achieves 239 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on gaming monitors. At 1440p High, the 157 FPS result is still excellent for high-refresh-rate displays, while at 4K High, the 87 FPS average is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset, while visually superior, drops to 181 FPS at 1080p, 119 FPS at 1440p, and 66 FPS at 4K, which may not justify the performance cost unless the user has a display that can take advantage of the higher frame rates.

For users with 1080p displays, the Medium preset provides 278 FPS, which is a 16% improvement over High and only 7% lower than Low. The Medium preset’s min FPS of 237 and max FPS of 320 show that it maintains a consistent frame delivery, making it a solid choice for competitive play. At 1440p, Medium delivers 205 FPS with a min of 174 FPS, which is a good option for users who want a smoother experience than High. At 4K, Medium is the recommended preset, as it provides 114 FPS with a min of 96 FPS, which is a significant improvement over High’s 87 FPS and Ultra’s 66 FPS.

The Low preset, while providing the highest frame rates (300 FPS at 1080p, 252 FPS at 1440p, 140 FPS at 4K), sacrifices too much visual quality for most users. The data indicates that the High preset is the sweet spot for this combo, as it leverages the GPU’s power without being excessively limited by the CPU. Users who prioritize maximum frame rates should consider Medium, while those who want the best visuals can use Ultra, but should be prepared for the lower frame rates, especially at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 300 FPS on Low, 278 FPS on Medium (with a min of 237 and max of 320), 239 FPS on High, and 181 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting provides the most complete data, showing a 83 FPS range that indicates the CPU’s influence on frame pacing. The step from Low to Medium is 22 FPS, from Medium to High is 39 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 58 FPS, showing a consistent degradation as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the results are 252 FPS on Low, 205 FPS on Medium (with a min of 174 and max of 235), 157 FPS on High, and 119 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting’s 61 FPS range is narrower than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is taking on more of the workload. The steps between settings are 47 FPS from Low to Medium, 48 FPS from Medium to High, and 38 FPS from High to Ultra, showing a more linear scaling pattern.

At 3840x2160, the combo produces 140 FPS on Low, 114 FPS on Medium (with a min of 96 and max of 131), 87 FPS on High, and 66 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting’s 35 FPS range is the narrowest of any resolution, confirming that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The steps between settings are 26 FPS from Low to Medium, 27 FPS from Medium to High, and 21 FPS from High to Ultra, showing that the GPU’s performance ceiling is being approached as settings increase.

The data shows a consistent pattern across all resolutions: Low provides the highest frame rates, Ultra the lowest, with Medium and High in between. The 1080p results are the most CPU-bound, as evidenced by the wide frame range at Medium and the significant drop from Low to Ultra. The 4K results are the most GPU-bound, with a narrower frame range and smaller differences between settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination ranks 61st out of 2944 tested combos in Palworld. This places the combo in the top 2.1% of all tested systems, which is a strong result given the CPU's mid-range positioning. The CPU itself ranks at the 74th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 21088, while the GPU ranks at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 77712. The disparity in percentile rankings suggests that the GPU is the primary driver of the combo's high rank.

The combo's rank is likely influenced by the GPU's ability to maintain high frame rates at 4K, where it delivers 66 FPS at Ultra and 114 FPS at Medium. The CPU's performance, while adequate, is a limiting factor at lower resolutions, as shown by the 1080p results. However, the combo's overall rank of 61st indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of tested systems, which is impressive given that the CPU is a 5000-series part paired with a 50-series GPU.

The nearest rivals for the CPU, such as the Intel Core i3-1220P (0.1% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (0.2% behind), have similar average benchmark scores, but the combo's rank in Palworld suggests that the specific pairing with the RTX 5090 D yields better results than these alternatives would. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (1.1% behind) and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.6% ahead), show that the RTX 5090 D performs well relative to its peers, but the combo's rank is ultimately a product of both components working together. The data indicates that this combo is a high-performance pairing for Palworld, with the GPU providing the bulk of the frame rate headroom while the CPU supports it adequately.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

VRAM 32 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2407 MHz MHz
TDP 575 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 140.0
3840x2160 Medium 114.0
3840x2160 High 87.0
3840x2160 Ultra 66.0
2560x1440 Low 252.0
2560x1440 Medium 205.0
2560x1440 High 157.0
2560x1440 Ultra 119.0
1920x1080 Low 300.0
1920x1080 Medium 278.0
1920x1080 High 239.0
1920x1080 Ultra 181.0

Palworld with Ryzen 5 5600G + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RTX 5090 D + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600G + RTX 5090 D

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.