Palworld
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 168 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 62 | 82 | 106 | 131 |
| 1440p QHD | 112 | 148 | 192 | 237 |
| 1080p Full HD | 170 | 224 | 268 | 289 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, a combination that produces a wide spread of frame rates depending on resolution and quality settings. The data reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound at 4K but increasingly CPU-limited as resolution drops, with the RTX 5090’s raw power often outpacing what the six-core Zen 3 processor can feed at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured performance across all twelve tested configurations, examining how the components interact and where the bottleneck shifts.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial across all settings, but the pattern reveals a clear shift in system balance. At Ultra settings, average FPS falls from 170 at 1920x1080 to 112 at 2560x1440, a 34% reduction, and then further to 62 at 3840x2160, a 45% drop from the 1440p result. This steep decline indicates the RTX 5090 is being progressively more taxed as pixel count increases, with the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor at 4K.
The scaling behavior is different at lower settings, where the CPU’s influence becomes more pronounced. At Low settings, the average frame rate goes from 289 at 1080p to 237 at 1440p and 131 at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p gap of 52 FPS (18%) is relatively modest, suggesting the Ryzen 5 5500 is holding back performance even at 1440p, as the GPU could likely push higher frame rates if given more headroom. The jump from 1440p to 4K, however, is a massive 106 FPS drop (45%), showing that the resolution increase finally overwhelms the GPU.
Medium settings display a similar but less extreme pattern. The average FPS moves from 268 at 1080p, to 192 at 1440p, and then to 106 at 4K. This represents a 28% drop between the first two resolutions and a 45% drop between the latter two. The consistency of the 4K penalty across Low, Medium, and Ultra settings—all hovering around 45%—strongly suggests that at 4K, the RTX 5090 is the definitive bottleneck, regardless of quality preset. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU’s single-thread performance, reflected in its 3dmark_single_thread score of 836, becomes a more significant factor, particularly at Low settings where the GPU work is lighter.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 brings a massive amount of hardware to bear on Palworld, with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. This is paired with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and the sheer memory capacity ensures that no texture or asset in the game will ever exceed the available VRAM, even at 4K Ultra. The data supports this, as the highest 4K Ultra average of 62 FPS is not a memory limitation but a compute one.
The GPU’s compute capabilities are equally formidable. The FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS, combined with 21,760 shading units, delivers the raw pixel-pushing power required for the higher resolution results. The pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s are the physical limits that the 4K frame rates approach. For instance, at 4K Medium, the measured average of 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 and maximum of 122 shows a consistent performance band, indicating that the GPU is processing frames steadily without thermal or power throttling issues.
The RTX 5090’s benchmark scores further contextualize its role. Its passmark_g3d score of 39,650 and 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 18,355 indicate a graphics card that is near the top of the performance stack, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the data—the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT with deltaPct values of 0.3% and 1.1% respectively—are actually lower-scoring, meaning the RTX 5090 is slightly ahead of them in average benchmark score. In Palworld, this translates to high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the CPU pairing prevents the GPU from reaching its full potential, especially at 1080p where the 289 FPS Low result is likely far below the GPU’s maximum capability.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 165th out of 3,711 tested combos for Palworld. This places it in the top 4.4% of all configurations, a strong result that reflects the GPU’s dominance. However, the rank also highlights the CPU’s limiting effect. The Ryzen 5 5500’s average benchmark score of 19,593 places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, Intel Core i5-12500, Intel Core i7-10700F, and Intel Core i5-11600KF—all have average scores within a 0.7% margin of each otheraint. This shows the CPU is a mid-range part, and pairing it with the top-tier RTX 5090 creates an imbalance.
The combo’s 165th rank, while impressive, is not indicative of a perfectly balanced system. If the CPU were stronger, the rank would likely be higher, given the GPU’s performance. The data shows that at 1440p High, the combo achieves 148 FPS, and at 1080p High, it reaches 224 FPS. These are excellent numbers, but the CPU’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 5,411 and 3dmark_16_threads score of 5,386 suggest that multi-threaded workloads are not its strong suit. In a game like Palworld, which can be CPU-intensive with many creatures on screen, the Ryzen 5 5500’s 6 cores and 12 threads may struggle to maintain high minimum frame rates, though the data does not show min FPS for most settings. The combo’s rank of 165 out of 3,711 confirms the RTX 5090’s raw power, but it also implies that many other combos with more balanced CPU-GPU pairings achieve better overall results.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the performance is consistently high but shows the CPU’s influence. The Low preset delivers an average of 289 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. Medium drops to 268 FPS, with a minimum of 228 and maximum of 308, showing some frame pacing variance. High produces 224 FPS, and Ultra yields 170 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 119 FPS, a 41% reduction, which is significant but not as steep as at higher resolutions.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very playable. Low settings result in 237 FPS average, Medium in 192 FPS (with a min of 163 and max of 221), High in 148 FPS, and Ultra in 112 FPS. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p for each setting is 18% for Low, 28% for Medium, 34% for High, and 34% for Ultra. This shows that the GPU is starting to become more of a factor at this resolution, but the CPU is still capable of feeding it adequately for most settings.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 5090 takes over as the clear bottleneck. Low settings produce an average of 131 FPS, which is still smooth, while Medium drops to 106 FPS (min 90, max 122). High settings yield 82 FPS, and Ultra falls to 62 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 62 FPS is the lowest in the dataset, and the gap between Ultra and High at this resolution (20 FPS) is smaller than at 1440p (36 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns from the most demanding settings when the GPU is heavily loaded. The minimum FPS of 90 at 4K Medium is notable, as it indicates the system can hold a relatively stable frame rate even under load.
Settings Recommendations
For players targeting 4K, the data suggests that the High preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. The 82 FPS average at 3840x2160 High is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay, and it is a 32% improvement over the 62 FPS Ultra result. While Ultra is playable, the 20 FPS gain from moving to High is substantial, and the visual difference between High and Ultra in a survival game like Palworld is often less impactful than the frame rate improvement. The Medium preset at 4K provides 106 FPS, which is excellent for high refresh rate monitors, but High is a better choice for those wanting more graphical fidelity without sacrificing too much speed.
At 1440p, the High preset is again the sweet spot. The 148 FPS average is fast enough for most high-refresh displays, and it is a 36 FPS jump over the Ultra preset’s 112 FPS. For competitive play or maximum smoothness, the Medium preset at 192 FPS is a strong option, but the visual trade-off is more noticeable at this resolution. The Low preset at 237 FPS is only recommended for players with 240Hz monitors who prioritize frame rate above all else.
At 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor, and the data shows that High is the recommended preset. The 224 FPS average is significantly higher than the 170 FPS Ultra result, and the CPU is already holding back the GPU at this resolution, so using Ultra only adds graphical load without a proportional frame rate benefit. The Medium preset at 268 FPS is marginally faster than High, but the visual quality loss is not worth the 44 FPS gain for most users. The Low preset at 289 FPS is the maximum achievable, but it is only 65 FPS faster than High)Skip, and the visual degradation is severeheavily pronounced. In summary, the High preset provides the best experience across all three resolutions, offering a strong compromise between visual fidelity and performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this CPU-GPU combo in Palworld?
A: The highest average frame rate is 289 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?
A: At 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average frame rate of 62 FPS. This is the lowest result in the measured data.
Q: Is this system more CPU-limited or GPU-limited at 1080p?
A: The data indicates a CPU limitation at 1080p. The frame rate difference between Low (289 FPS) and Ultra (170 FPS) settings is significant, but the absolute values are high, suggesting the Ryzen 5 5500’s processing power is the primary constraint, as the RTX 5090 has ample headroom to render more frames.
Q: What is the combos rank in the benchmark database for Palworld?
A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 165th out of 3,711 tested combos for Palworld.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded for this combo?
A: The lowest minimum frame rate recorded is 90 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Medium settings preset. Other settings presets do not have min FPS data provided.
Q: How does the RTX 5090’s performance compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, has an average score of 79,605, which is 0.3% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT has a score of 78,940, which is 1.1% slower.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 131.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 106.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 82.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 62.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 237.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 192.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 148.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 112.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 289.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 268.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 224.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 170.0 |
Palworld with Ryzen 5 5500 + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5500 + RTX 5090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.