Palworld

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in this measured dataset for Palworld, covering four quality presetsacross three resolutions. The combination yields a combo rank of 1646 out of 3711 tested combos in the game, placing it in the upper midrange of the database's measured hardware pool. With the RTX 5060's Blackwell architecture and the 4600G's six Zen 2 cores, this pairing delivers a wide spread of frame rates, from a playable 33 FPS at 4K Ultra to a high-spread 192 FPS at 1080p Low.

How This Combo Ranks

The data set explicitly tracks combo rank against every other tested CPU–GPU pairing for Palworld. This specific pair sits at rank 1646 of 3711 combos, meaning it outperforms more than half of the tested configurations—specifically, it is ahead of the 2065 combos that rank below it. The rank reflects the combination shot, not just the CPU or GPU individually. For context, the CPU ranks in the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the broader benchmark suite, and the GPU ranks in the 72nd percentile against all GPUs. These percentile scores suggest that both components are individually capable, yet the pair's placement in the game is slightly lower than either computer alone suggests, likely due to Palworld's specific scaling behavior. The nearest CPU rivals, measured by average benchmark score, are the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17482, +0.1% delta versus the 4600G's 17507), the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (17614, -0.6%), the Intel Core 7 150U (17395, +0.6%), and the Intel Core i3-14100T (17648, -0.8%). The GPU's nearest challengers are the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3%), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.8%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011, +1.2%). These deltas are small—the CPU and GPU each sit within roughly a point of these rivals, indicating stable target positioning.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 4600G is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on AMD's Zen 2 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. It carries a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. Cache setup includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 8 MB L3. It runs on socket AM4 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory, the bandwidth rating of 51.2 GB/s . The processor's integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are present but not relevant to this discrete GPU configuration; the 4600G acts purely as the CPU channel in this pair.

In Palworld, the CPU's impact is most visible at high frame rates when the GPU is not the limiting factor. At 1920x1080 Low settings, the combo reaches 192 FPS, a threshold where a weaker processor would likely cap out. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, as measured by Cinebench R23, is 13593 points in multi-core and 1919 points in single-core. These numbers place it well within the range of competing mainstream chips from the same era. Its nearest rivals, as listed, are all small-core APUs or low-power laptop parts: the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, the Ryzen 3 8300GE, the Core 7 150U, and the Core i3-14100T. The deltaPct values—0.1% faster than the 5355GE, 0.6% faster than the 150U, and 0.8% slower than the 14100T—show that the 4600G occupies a narrow performance band relative to those chips. At stock settings, its boost clock helps keep frame time consistent in open-world environments, where many NPCs and physics objects are active. The CPU's role is balanced: it has enough threads (12) to feed the RTX 5060 at 1080p, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck.

A note on detail: the AMD chip has no L3 cache beyond 8 MB, which is a competitive but design from 2020. Its launch MSRP was $154, which is a pricing detail; the chip's current production status is Active, and it remains socket-compatible with modern AM4 boards.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the secondary half, built on the GB206 chip with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture at a 5 nm TSMC process. It has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is rated at 1750 MHz (running 28 Gbps effective). The GPU has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, along with 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores. Clocks are set at 2280 MHz base and 2497 MHz boost. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8; the power draw is 145 W TDP, with a suggested power supply of 300 W. Its launch MSRP is $299 USD.

In Palworld, the GPU's role dominates at higher resolutions and settings. The measured frame rates show clear breakdown patterns: at 2160p, the GPU scales from 70 FPS (Low) down to 33 FPS (Ultra). The retina also demonstrates that the RTX 5060 can drive high refresh rates at 1080p; in that resolution it reaches 192 FPS on Low settings and 91 at Ultra. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 is within +/ – 0.3% of two integrated processors (the AMD Radeon 860M and the Nvidia GeForce MX550), and within 1.2% of the Radeon RX 6750 XT. This suggests the RTX class 5060 sits in a narrow performance band, though its actual gaming results in Palworld are measured rather than approximated. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most resolutions here; the 48 ROPs and 120 TMUs move pixels efficiently. The GPU's close rivals, per the transistor stats, are the AMD Radeon 860 (which is an iGPU) and the Nvidia MX550 (a mobile part), but the 5060 is a desktop card. In the passmark database, the GPU returns a G3D score of 20891 and a compute score of 10899, with a DirectX 12 score of 77, which is lower than the DirectX 10 score of 127—these are odd but have no impact on the FPS measurement.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS table includes 12 rows covering 10 resolution and preset combinations at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. Each row reports an average FPS; for Medium preset only, minimum and maximum FPS are also provided.

At 3840x2160 for the 4K UHD class, the combo yields an average of 33 FPS at Ultra, 44 FPS at High, 57 FPS at Medium, and 70 FPS at Low. Only the Medium row includes variation: min 48, max 65. At Ultra, the 33 FPS average is smooth only at relatively jittery 30 FPS class; High at 44 FPS is borderline for a 30-60 FPS target. Low, with 70 FPS, actually becomes the most fluid at 4K, but the visual quality hits the bottom.

2560x1440

At 1440p, the story improves significantly. Ultra averages 60 FPS, High averages 79 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS, and Low averages 126 FPS. The Medium row also shows min 42 FPS and max 118. The 102 FPS average from Medium is suitable for common 100 Hz+ displays. The 126 FPS Low is higher than many lower-tier combos could maintain, and Ultra's 60 FPS hits the standard refresh rate target.

1920x1080

At 1080p, the combo is clearly at the high end. Ultra delivers 91 FPS average, High 120 FPS, Medium 156 FPS, and Low 192 FPS. Medium with a 156 average and min 132, max 179 demonstrates stability. Even Ultra settings stay above 90 FPS, so any of the four presets provide a smooth experience on a 60 Hz monitor, and the low setting is suitable for very high refresh rate (240Hz) gaming.

The observed scaling pattern: lowering the resolution from 4K to 1440p improves frame rates by around 2x for the same settings; from 1440 to 1080 the gain is about still larger, at least for the mid-level setting. For example, Medium 1440p at 102 FPS versus Medium 1080p at 156 FPS — that's about 53% higher. The fps differences confirm that the GPU is the main scaling at 4K and 1440p, while at 1080p both parts are able to deliver high average numbers.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo produces in Palworld?

A: The highest is 192 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS measured?

A: The lowest is 33 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 Ultra settings.

Q: At 2560x1440, which settings get above 100 frames per second?

A: Medium produces an average of 102 FPS, with a min of 87 and max of 118. Low reaches 126 FPS. High and Ultra are below 100.

Q: How close is the GPU to its nearest rival in overall benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5060's average benchmark score is 26331. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401 – a delta of -0.3%, and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 also scores 26421 – also -0.3% delta from the 5060.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded Cinebench R23 score?

A: Cinebench R23 single-core registers 1919 points; multi-core is 13593.

Q: What is the combo's rank in Palworld— and total number of combos tested?

A: 1646 out of 3711 measured combinations.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured dataset, the ideal balance of average frames and visual fidelity depends on the target resolution.

At 1080p, consider High as the default: 120 FPS is above 100 and smooth for most displays. If you have a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor, switching to Low yields 192 FPS, which is near the frame ceiling of the measured numbers. The Ultra preset's 90 FPS is still acceptable, but the 30 FPS drop from High is not worth the perceptual difference if you're after responsiveness.

At 1440p, the Medium preset hits 102 FPS with a non-severe min of 87. That is the best compromise. Ultra sacrifices nearly half that and drops to 60 FPS, which is a hard 60Hz target. High gives 79, between the two; Medium is the clear pick. Low at 126 FPS is attractive for esports-style play, but the visual reduced experience is common.

At 2160p, none of the presets exceed 75 FPS and only Low reaches 70. Ultra and High produce 33 and 44 respectively, which are below the 60-mark still regime. Medium is average 57 with a min 48, which is close to the 50 threshold. For true 60 FPS at 4K, users should use Medium but accept 3% under average, or lower the resolution to 1440p and run with Medium or High. The data shows that Medium is the only 4K preset with a stable min above 45; Ultra's streak is not given but is implied to be below 33.

In every resolution, the Medium preset tends to give the most balanced ± alternating from the optional Freezeros. The measured rows give min/max only for Medium; the 1080p Medium has min/max 132/179, and at 1440p 87/118, both of which show a consistent range (about ±26 to ±33 FPS). This tells that Medium is the most stable in experience. That is why, for most users, Medium at 1440p or Medium at 1080p is the full result.

Taken together, the data recommends the 1440p / Medium combination (102 FPS) or 1080p / High (120 FPS) depending if you prefer performance or extra resolution.

The RTX 5060 is an 8 GB part, and Palworld at these settings doesn't extra VRAM, as proven by the measured frames, but the 8 GB is enough for all three resolutions tested; at 4K there is no (exact) VRAM stall indicated.

Based on this measured set, the combo is best relied on for 1080p and some 1440p gaming at moderately high refresh rates, but falls into the 30–60 FPS band at true 4K.