Overpower

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers a broadly playable experience in Overpower, but the data reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings. The measured frames per second (FPS) show a pairing where the GPU is the primary driver of performance, especially as graphical load increases. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, exploring the CPU and GPU roles, resolution scaling, and optimal settings for this specific hardware pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS recorded for this combination is 143 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This drops to 89 at Medium, 83 at High, and 69 at Ultra settings.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the combo achieves an average of 63 FPS on High settings and 68 FPS on Medium. However, at Ultra settings, the average drops to 52 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062. This places it virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030), Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098), AMD EPYC 4364P (45970), and AMD EPYC 7303 (45960), with delta percentages of only 0.1% to 0.2% in either direction.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only minimum FPS values in the data are for Medium settings. At 1080p, the minimum is 76 FPS; at 1440p, it is 67 FPS; and at 4K, it is 57 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark performance compare to its closest competitors?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20282. It sits slightly below the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), Intel Arc B570 (20556), and Intel Arc A750 (20582), with delta percentages of -1% to -1.5% relative to those cards.

*Q: Where does this specific CPU and GPU combo rank among all tested combinations in Overpower?*

A: This combo ranks 1686 out of 2980 tested combos in the game, placing it in the 57th percentile of all tested systems.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor features a 24 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

In the context of Overpower, the CPU's role appears to be one of consistent support rather than a bottleneck. Its benchmark scores are strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4516 and a multithread score of 37816. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14769 and single-core score of 2085 further illustrate its capability. The data shows that as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, the FPS drop is consistent, which typically indicates that the CPU is keeping up with the GPU's demands. For instance, at High settings, the system loses 11 FPS going from 1080p to 1440p and another 11 FPS going from 1440p to 4K. This linear scaling suggests the CPU is not introducing a variable bottleneck. The processor's 14 threads are likely sufficient for the game's engine, as the performance degradation is uniform and attributable to the GPU's increasing workload at higher resolutions.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 89 places it in the top tier of all processors. However, its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core i9-13900HX, have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with deltas of only 0.1%. This indicates that within this performance class, the Core Ultra 5 235 is a solid but not exceptional performer. In gaming, this means its contribution to Overpower's frame rate is likely on par with its direct competitors, and the differences in FPS would be minimal.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the defining component in this system's gaming performance. Based on the Turing architecture and built on a 12 nm process, it features 2560 shading units, 40 RT cores, and 320 tensor cores. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1605 MHz, with a boost clock of 1770 MHz.

The GPU's impact on Overpower is pronounced. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p results in a 74 FPS difference (143 to 69), demonstrating how heavily the game's visual fidelity relies on the graphics card. The RTX 2070 SUPER's Passmark G3D score of 18169 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1651 place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is closely matched by the Intel Arc B570 and Arc A750, which have higher average scores but by a margin of only 1.3% and 1.5%, respectively.

The 8 GB of VRAM is a key specification. In Overpower, the data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 52, suggesting that the combination of high resolution and maxed-out settings is pushing the GPU to its limits. The consistent FPS drops with increased resolution and settings point to the RTX 2070 SUPER being the primary bottleneck in this pairing. While the CPU provides a stable foundation, the GPU dictates the overall frame rate, especially in demanding scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

At 1920x1080, the combo starts with an average of 143 FPS on Low settings. This is a very high frame rate, ideal for competitive play. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 and a maximum of 102. High settings yield an average of 83 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, produces an average of 69 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 74 FPS, highlighting the significant graphical headroom the game can demand.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down. Low settings still deliver a high average of 127 FPS. Medium settings average 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91. High settings average 74 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to an average of 61 FPS. At this resolution, the system remains playable across all presets, though Ultra is closer to the 60 FPS baseline.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's workload becomes substantial. Low settings yield an average of 108 FPS, which is still very good. Medium settings average 68 FPS, with a minimum of 57 and a maximum of 78. High settings follow closely with an average of 63 FPS. Ultra settings are the most demanding, producing an average of just 52 FPS. This is the only configuration in the data set that falls below the 60 FPS average threshold.

The data shows a clear hierarchy: the system is most comfortable at 1080p, capable at 1440p, and challenged at 4K, particularly with Ultra settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K reveals how the system scales under increasing resolution demands. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 143 at 1080p to 127 at 1440p, a decrease of 16 FPS. From 1440p to 4K, it drops another 19 FPS to 108. This shows a total loss of 35 FPS from 1080p to 4K at Low settings.

The scaling pattern changes at higher settings. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 83 at 1080p to 74 at 1440p, a loss of 9 FPS. From 1440p to 4K, it drops another 11 FPS to 63, for a total loss of 20 FPS. At Ultra settings, the progression is from 69 at 1080p to 61 at 1440p, a loss of 8 FPS, and then down to 52 at 4K, another 9 FPS loss.

These patterns are telling. At Low settings, the FPS drop is larger in absolute terms (35 FPS) but the percentage drop is roughly 24%. At High and Ultra settings, the absolute drops are smaller (20 FPS and 17 FPS respectively), but the percentage drops are also around 24-25%. This consistency suggests that the system is not hitting a hard memory or bandwidth wall at any specific resolution. Instead, the performance degrades proportionally with the increase in pixel count. This is typical of a system where the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as it must process more pixels at higher resolutions. The CPU maintains its performance, leaving the GPU to handle the extra load. The data implies that the RTX 2070 SUPER, with its 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, is being fully utilized at 4K, especially on Ultra settings where it drops below 60 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and frame rate target.

For 1920x1080, the High preset is the best balance of visual quality and performance. It delivers an average of 83 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS standard and leaves headroom for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset, at 69 FPS, is also playable, but the 14 FPS gain from dropping to High is significant for a relatively minor visual difference. The Medium preset offers a higher average of 89 FPS, but the jump to High is worth it for the quality increase.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is again the recommended choice, with an average of 74 FPS. This provides a smooth experience at a higher resolution. Ultra settings average 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold but may suffer from occasional dips. The Medium preset at 79 FPS is a viable alternative for those prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the most sensible choice. It yields an average of 68 FPS, which is playable and above 60. High settings drop to 63 FPS, which is also acceptable, but the minimum FPS data for Medium (57) suggests it holds up better under load. Ultra settings, at 52 FPS, are not recommended for a consistently smooth experience. The Low preset at 108 FPS is the only way to get a high refresh rate experience at 4K, but it sacrifices significant visual quality.

Overall, the High preset is the sweet spot for this combo at 1080p and 1440p, while Medium is the more balanced choice at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER holds the rank of 1686 out of 2980 tested combinations in Overpower. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, specifically at the 57th percentile.

This ranking is a direct reflection of the data. The GPU's percentile ranking of 65 is the more limiting factor, while the CPU's high percentile of 89 helps to boost the combo's overall position. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a system that is solidly above average but not at the top of the charts. The measured FPS in the game aligns with this ranking, showing strong performance at 1080p and 1440p, but struggling to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra.

The data suggests that this combo is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, providing a high-quality experience without the need for the most powerful components available. Its rank of 1686 indicates that it outperforms more than half of all tested systems, making it a capable setup for Overpower. The primary limitation is the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. If a user were to upgrade the graphics card, the CPU would likely be able to support a substantial performance increase, as it is not the bottleneck in this configuration.