Overpower

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER to form a 1080p and 1440p capable gaming system for Overpower, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and settings increase. The measured frame rates show a clear hierarchy where the CPU provides ample headroom at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at 4K Ultra settings. This analysis breaks down the specific roles each component plays, offers settings guidance, and contextualizes the combo’s ranking against other tested configurations.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 85th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 36938. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, scores 36945, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% behind. In multi-core workloads like Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25891, while single-core performance reaches 3655 points.

For Overpower, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p with Low settings, where the combo achieves 129 FPS. This high frame rate suggests the processor can feed the GPU efficiently at lower graphical loads. The 10 cores and 10 threads provide enough parallelism for the game’s action genre, which typically benefits from multiple threads for physics, AI, and scene management. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz helps maintain responsiveness in single-threaded tasks, as reflected in the Passmark single-thread score of 4412.

However, the CPU’s contribution diminishes as resolution increases. At 4K, the frame rates drop significantly across all settings, indicating that the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The data shows a 57 FPS average at 4K High, which is only 24% lower than the 75 FPS at 1080p High. This relatively modest drop suggests that the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s demands even at higher resolutions, but the GPU’s raw throughput limits overall performance.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture with a TU106 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 1470 MHz with a boost clock of 1650 MHz, and memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The card features 2176 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 34 RT cores and 272 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance is 7.181 TFLOPS.

The RTX 2060 SUPER sits in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18093. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, scores 18159, a delta of -0.4%. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 is 0.5% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 460 is 1.5% behind. In Passmark G3D testing, the GPU scores 16462, while its DirectX 12 score is 61.

In Overpower, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for the tested settings, as no out-of-memory issues are indicated in the data. The memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s supports high-resolution textures and effects without significant stuttering. At 1080p Ultra, the combo delivers 62 FPS, which drops to 47 FPS at 4K Ultra. This 24% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings highlights the GPU’s limitations at higher pixel counts.

The GPU’s clock speeds play a role in maintaining consistent frame times. The boost clock of 1650 MHz helps sustain performance during intense action sequences, though the data does not include frame time variance. The 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is adequate for the game’s graphical demands at 1080p and 1440p, but the card struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K High (57 FPS average), suggesting that users should consider lowering settings at that resolution.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset delivers the best experience at each resolution. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves 129 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset reaches 81 FPS, and High drops to 75 FPS. Ultra is the lowest at 62 FPS. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, Low is the best choice, while Medium offers a balance between visual quality and performance.

At 1440p, the Low preset delivers 115 FPS, which remains highly playable. Medium drops to 72 FPS, High to 67 FPS, and Ultra to 56 FPS. The data suggests that Medium at 1440p provides a good experience, as it stays above 60 FPS while offering improved visuals over Low. For users prioritizing frame rate, Low is still viable, but Medium is the recommended sweet spot.

At 4K, the Low preset achieves 98 FPS, which is surprisingly high and suggests that the game is well-optimized at lower settings. Medium drops to 61 FPS, just above the 60 FPS target, while High falls to 57 FPS and Ultra to 47 FPS. For 4K gaming, Low is the only preset that provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium is borderline, and users who prefer visual fidelity may accept the 57 FPS average at High, but this comes with the risk of drops below 60 FPS.

The overall recommendation is to use Medium settings for 1080p and 1440p, as it offers a good balance of visual quality and performance. For 4K, Low is the safest choice to maintain high frame rates. The data does not include min FPS values for most presets, except for Medium, which shows a minimum of 69 FPS at 1080p, 61 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K. These minimums indicate that Medium provides consistent performance without severe frame drops.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2623 out of 3713 tested combos in Overpower. This places it in the 71st percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of the combos tested. The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU’s strong multi-core performance and the GPU’s mid-range capabilities.

The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking among all processors contributes positively to this combo’s standing. Its average benchmark score of 36938 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, which scores 36945 with a 0% delta. This means the CPU is competitive with other mid-range options, providing solid foundation for gaming.

The GPU, however, ranks in the 62nd percentile, which drags the combo down slightly. Its average benchmark score of 18093 is close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, -0.4% delta), indicating that the RTX 2060 SUPER is still relevant but not a top-tier performer. The combo’s rank of 2623 suggests that while the CPU is capable, the GPU limits the overall system in Overpower, especially at higher resolutions.

Compared to combos with higher-end GPUs, this setup would likely rank lower due to the GPU’s mid-range position. However, the data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 129 FPS, which is competitive with many stronger GPUs at lower settings. The combo’s rank indicates that it is a viable option for 1080p and 1440p gaming but not ideal for 4K at high settings.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals which component is the primary bottleneck at different resolutions. At Low settings, the combo delivers 129 FPS at 1080p, 115 FPS at 1440p, and 98 FPS at 4K. This represents a 24% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 15% drop from 1440p to 4K. The relatively small declines suggest that at Low settings, the CPU is able to keep up with the GPU’s output, and the GPU is not heavily taxed by the lower graphical load.

At Medium settings, the FPS drops from 81 at 1080p to 72 at 1440p (11% decrease) and then to 61 at 4K (15% decrease from 1440p). This pattern shows a more pronounced drop at 4K, indicating that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor as pixel count increases. The minimum FPS at Medium also decreases from 69 at 1080p to 61 at 1440p and 52 at 4K, reinforcing the GPU constraint.

At High settings, the FPS drops from 75 at 1080p to 67 at 1440p (11% decrease) and then to 57 at 4K (15% decrease). The 4K High result of 57 FPS is below the 60 FPS target, clearly showing that the GPU cannot maintain smooth performance at this resolution and setting combination. The Ultra preset shows a similar trend: 62 FPS at 1080p, 56 FPS at 1440p, and 47 FPS at 4K.

The data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo for Overpower. Even at 1080p Low with 129 FPS, the CPU has headroom, as evidenced by its strong single-thread score of 4412. The GPU, however, reaches its limits at 4K, particularly at higher settings. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the game, but the raw compute power of 7.181 TFLOPS is not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Overpower?

A: Based on the measured data, 1080p is the best resolution, with all presets exceeding 60 FPS (Low: 129 FPS, Medium: 81 FPS, High: 75 FPS, Ultra: 62 FPS). 1440p is also viable with Medium at 72 FPS, but 4K is only playable at Low settings (98 FPS).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36938, which is identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945, 0% delta). It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18093. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which scores 18159 with a -0.4% delta.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where it achieves 98 FPS. At Medium, the average drops to 61 FPS, which is borderline, while High (57 FPS) and Ultra (47 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the limiting component at higher resolutions?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are more pronounced at higher settings (e.g., 24% drop at Ultra), while the CPU maintains sufficient performance, as evidenced by its 85th percentile ranking.

Q: What settings provide the best experience at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 1440p deliver 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS, which provides a smooth experience. Low settings offer 115 FPS for higher refresh rates, while High (67 FPS) and Ultra (56 FPS) are also playable but with less headroom.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data is presented below for each resolution and settings preset. All values are average FPS unless otherwise noted.

1920x1080:

• Low: 129 FPS
• Medium: 81 FPS (min 69, max 93)
• High: 75 FPS
• Ultra: 62 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 115 FPS
• Medium: 72 FPS (min 61, max 83)
• High: 67 FPS
• Ultra: 56 FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 98 FPS
• Medium: 61 FPS (min 52, max 70)
• High: 57 FPS
• Ultra: 47 FPS

The data shows a consistent pattern where Low settings provide the highest frame rates across all resolutions, with the gap between Low and Ultra widening as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 67 FPS (129 vs 62), while at 4K, the difference is 51 FPS (98 vs 47). This indicates that the GPU’s performance scales more steeply with settings at higher resolutions, confirming that it is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The Medium preset offers the only min/max data points, showing a minimum of 52 FPS at 4K, which is below the 60 FPS target but still playable for most users.