Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
189
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 189 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 118 143 152 241
1440p QHD 139 168 179 279
1080p Full HD 156 187 200 310

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Ultra 118
3840x2160 High 143
3840x2160 Medium 152
3840x2160 Low 241
2560x1440 Ultra 139
2560x1440 High 168
2560x1440 Medium 179
2560x1440 Low 279
1920x1080 Ultra 156
1920x1080 High 187
1920x1080 Medium 200
1920x1080 Low 310

Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis

Overpower, the 2023 action title, presents an interesting profile for the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combo. The benchmark data shows this pairing is positioned in the 52.8th percentile of all tested configurations for this game, ranking 1574th out of 2980 combos. This mid-pack placement suggests the system is capable, but the measured frame rates across various resolutions and settings reveal a more nuanced story about where its strengths and limitations lie.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals a clear and predictable trend as resolution increases, but the magnitude of the performance drop is a key indicator of system balance. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average frame rate falls from 89 FPS to 79 FPS, a decrease of 11.2%. The jump from 1440p to 3840x2160 is more punishing, with the High preset average dropping from 79 FPS to 67 FPS, a 15.2% reduction. This pattern intensifies at the highest visual fidelity. At Ultra settings, the 1080p to 1440p transition sees a drop from 74 FPS to 66 FPS (10.8% decline), while the step to 4K Ultra results in a 56 FPS average, a 15.2% fall from the 1440p figure.

The scaling pattern suggests that the RTX 4070 is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops are not linear, with the 4K resolution consistently taking a heavier toll on performance than the 1440p step. This indicates that the GPU's rendering pipeline, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, begins to saturate as pixel count increases. The 4K High setting still manages a playable 67 FPS, but the drop from 1440p is substantial enough to show that the graphics card is working near its limits.

Interestingly, the Low preset shows a different scaling pattern. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 153 FPS, which drops to 137 FPS at 1440p (a 10.5% decline) and then to 116 FPS at 4K (a 15.3% decline from 1440p). The absolute frame rates are higher, but the percentage drops between resolutions are remarkably consistent with the High preset, hovering around 10-15%. This consistency suggests that even when graphical load is lightened, the system's performance ceiling is still being constrained by the same component, likely the CPU at lower resolutions and the GPU as resolution climbs.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process. Its benchmark scores place it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27507. This places it in close contention with several desktop processors, as its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (delta of -0.1%), Intel Core i5-12600K (delta of -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (delta of -0.3%). The data indicates this mobile chip is essentially on par with these established desktop parts, which is notable for a processor with a 28 W TDP and a 3.60 GHz base clock boosting to 4.50 GHz.

In the context of Overpower, the CPU's role appears critical at 1080p. At this resolution, the GPU is less burdened, and the frame rates are higher, reaching 153 FPS on Low settings. The fact that the frame rate drops by only 10.5% when moving from 1080p to 1440p on Low settings, but the gap widens between the CPU's capabilities and the GPU's output, suggests that the processor is keeping pace adequately. The 18 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache provide ample resources for the game's logic and physics. However, the processor's position relative to its rivals — being 0.1% slower than the Ryzen 7 5800 and 0.3% slower than the Core i5-12600K — means it is not a performance outlier.

The CPU's single-threaded performance, as indicated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1647.5, is sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is most stressed, the frame rate drops to 56 FPS. This severe drop is more attributable to the GPU's workload than to CPU limitations, as the processor is likely idling more while waiting for the graphics card to finish rendering frames. The 14-core configuration, with its mix of performance and efficiency cores, appears well-suited to handle the background tasks and game logic without causing frame pacing issues.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the more dominant component in this pairing, and the benchmark data consistently shows its influence scaling with resolution. This GPU, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and built on TSMC's 5 nm process, houses 5888 shading units and 46 RT cores. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, which is a critical factor for high-resolution textures. The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 37648. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (delta of 0.1%), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (delta of 0.4%), and the RTX 4080 Mobile (delta of -1.3%), indicating it is a strong performer but not at the very top of the hierarchy.

In Overpower, the RTX 4070's performance is the defining factor at 4K. The drop from 67 FPS at 4K High to 56 FPS at 4K Ultra is a 16.4% reduction, showing that the highest preset demands more from the GPU than it can comfortably deliver for a smooth 60 FPS experience. The GPU's boost clock of 2475 MHz and FP32 compute of 29.15 TFLOPS are substantial, but the data suggests they are not enough to maintain high frame rates at the most demanding settings. The 56 FPS at 4K Ultra is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the baseline for smooth gameplay.

The GPU's memory subsystem also plays a role. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for this game, but the 192-bit memory bus, while providing 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, is narrower than some higher-tier cards. This could contribute to the performance scaling pattern observed. When moving from Medium to High settings at 1440p, the frame rate drops from 85 FPS to 79 FPS (a 7.1% decrease), but the jump from High to Ultra is more significant, falling to 66 FPS (a 16.5% decrease). This non-linear scaling suggests that the Ultra preset introduces graphical features that heavily tax the GPU's compute and memory resources, pushing the card beyond its optimal efficiency point.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only at High settings, where the average frame rate is 67 FPS. At Ultra settings, the average drops to 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has an average benchmark score of 27507, placing it 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and 0.3% below the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain high frame rates?

A: At 1920x1080, the combo achieves its highest frame rates, with a 153 FPS average on Low settings and 89 FPS on High settings.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1440p to 4K?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 79 FPS to 67 FPS, a 15.2% decrease. At Ultra settings, it drops from 66 FPS to 56 FPS, a 15.2% decrease.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1080p Low, the CPU's performance is more relevant, as the frame rate of 153 FPS is high enough to potentially be limited by the processor's single-thread capabilities.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 1574th out of 2980 combos, placing it in the 52.8th percentile for Overpower performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1574 out of 2980 tested configurations places it in the 52.8th percentile, meaning it outperforms slightly more than half of all other system pairings tested in Overpower. This is a solidly mid-pack result, which is somewhat surprising given the individual component strengths. The CPU is in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, so one might expect a higher combined ranking. The data suggests that the pairing is well-matched in terms of avoiding severe bottlenecks, but it also means neither component is exceptional enough to push the system into the upper echelons of performance.

The gap between the component percentiles and the combo percentile is telling. A system with a CPU in the 79th percentile and a GPU in the 81st percentile might ideally rank higher than the 52.8th percentile if both were fully utilized. This discrepancy implies that Overpower might be sensitive to other factors, such as memory bandwidth or specific architectural features, that are not fully captured by the individual component benchmark scores. The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 4080 Mobile, is 1.3% faster on average, but this does not translate into a dramatically different gaming experience.

The ranking also reflects the mobile nature of the CPU. While the Core Ultra 5 125H is competitive with desktop chips in synthetic benchmarks, its 28 W TDP and mobile design may limit sustained performance in gaming scenarios. The data shows that the combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from being a weak one. It sits in a comfortable middle ground, capable of handling the game well at most settings, but not excelling at the most demanding 4K Ultra configurations.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo depends heavily on the user's resolution preference and tolerance for frame rate fluctuations. At 1920x1080, the High preset offers an excellent balance, delivering an average of 89 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience without the performance cost of Ultra, which drops to 74 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p yields 96 FPS, but the visual quality difference between Medium and High is often significant, making High the better choice for most users.

For 2560x1440, the High preset remains a strong recommendation, with an average of 79 FPS. This is still comfortably above 60 FPS and offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 66 FPS, which is playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. The Medium preset at 1440p provides 85 FPS, but as with 1080p, the trade-off in visual quality may not be worth the frame rate increase over High.

At 3840x2160, the recommendations change. The High preset is the only setting that achieves an average above 60 FPS, at 67 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K gaming. The Medium preset averages 73 FPS, which is higher, but the drop in visual quality is more noticeable at this resolution. The Ultra preset at 4K, with its 56 FPS average, is not recommended for a consistent 60 FPS experience, as the minimum frame rate may dip further. The Low preset at any resolution is not recommended for this system, as the high frame rates (116-153 FPS) are unnecessary and come at a significant visual cost.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data shows a comprehensive picture of the combo's performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves the highest average at 153 FPS, followed by Medium at 96 FPS, High at 89 FPS, and Ultra at 74 FPS. The Medium preset has a recorded minimum of 81 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS, indicating some fluctuation but generally stable performance.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease across all settings. Low averages 137 FPS, Medium averages 85 FPS (with a min of 73 and max of 98), High averages 79 FPS, and Ultra averages 66 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, with a 10.5% drop on Low, an 11.5% drop on Medium, an 11.2% drop on High, and a 10.8% drop on Ultra.

The 3840x2160 resolution shows the most significant performance impact. Low settings average 116 FPS, Medium averages 73 FPS (with a min of 62 and max of 84), High averages 67 FPS, and Ultra drops to 56 FPS. The percentage drops from 1440p are consistent across settings, with Low falling 15.3%, Medium falling 14.1%, High falling 15.2%, and Ultra falling 15.2%. This uniformity suggests a consistent GPU bottleneck at 4K, regardless of the graphical preset. The data reveals that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring a compromise in settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Cores / Threads 14 / 18
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 28W
Socket Intel BGA 2049
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2475 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Ultra 118.0
3840x2160 High 143.0
3840x2160 Medium 152.0
3840x2160 Low 241.0
2560x1440 Ultra 139.0
2560x1440 High 168.0
2560x1440 Medium 179.0
2560x1440 Low 279.0
1920x1080 Ultra 156.0
1920x1080 High 187.0
1920x1080 Medium 200.0
1920x1080 Low 310.0

Overpower with iUltra 5 125H + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 125H + RTX 4070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.