Overpower
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 36 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 30 | 26 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 24 | 33 | 33 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 29 | 35 | 38 | 61 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 presents a stark illustration of GPU-bound performance in Overpower. The data shows a dramatic shift in frame rates as resolution scales, with the gap between settings narrowing significantly at higher resolutions, indicating that the graphics card is the primary limiting factor across almost the entire testing spectrum.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern: performance degrades predictably as resolution increases, but the rate of degradation tells a more nuanced story. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 60.7 FPS, which drops to 53.2 FPS at 1440p and further to 47.7 FPS at 4K. This represents a 21.4% drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, suggesting that even at the lowest graphical fidelity, the GPU is already near its limits.
The scaling becomes more aggressive when moving to higher presets. At High settings, the frame rate falls from 35.4 FPS at 1080p to 32.6 FPS at 1440p, then to 29.8 FPS at 4K. That is only a 15.8% reduction across the entire resolution range, a notably smaller decline than what the Low settings show. This compression of performance across resolutions is a classic indicator that the GTX 1650's compute and memory subsystems are saturated; the GPU cannot take advantage of the lower pixel count at 1080p because it is already bottlenecked by its raw processing capacity.
The Medium preset shows a similar pattern: 38.4 FPS at 1080p, 32.7 FPS at 1440p, and 26.4 FPS at 4K. Here, the drop from 1080p to 4K is 31.3%, which is steeper than High but still less than the 1080p-to-4K gap at Low. The Ultra preset, by contrast, shows the least sensitivity to resolution: 29.1 FPS at 1080p, 23.6 FPS at 1440p, and 23.3 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is nearly identical to the 1440p result, a clear sign that the Ultra settings impose a hard ceiling on performance that is independent of pixel count. This suggests that at Ultra, the game's shader complexity and texture loads overwhelm the GPU's 4 GB frame buffer, making resolution a secondary factor.
GPU Role
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the decisive component in this configuration. Its 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 128.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards. The benchmark results reflect this: the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 7880 places it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 8713 is nearly matched by the AMD Radeon 550X, which sits just 0.4% higher. This proximity to entry-level rivals confirms that the GTX 1650 is positioned at the lower end of the performance spectrum.
The clock speeds are equally telling. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1485 MHz and boosts to 1665 MHz, but these frequencies do little to compensate for the limited 896 shading units and 32 ROPs. The pixel rate of 53.28 GPixel/s and texture rate of 93.24 GTexel/s are the physical constraints that bind performance in Overpower. The FP32 throughput of 2.984 TFLOPS is sufficient for basic rendering but falls short when the game demands complex lighting and particle effects at higher presets.
The memory situation is particularly acute. With only 4 GB of VRAM, the card struggles with the High and Ultra presets, where the data shows 29.8 FPS and 23.3 FPS at 4K, respectively. The low preset at 4K achieves 47.7 FPS, a 49.8% improvement over High, which strongly implies that texture streaming and memory allocation are the primary bottlenecks rather than raw shader performance. The GPU's 12 nm process node and 75 W TDP also indicate a design focused on efficiency over outright power, which further limits its ability to sustain high frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this combination ranks 1703 out of 1744 tested combos in Overpower. This places it in the bottom 2.4% of all configurations, a position that aligns with the GPU's overall percentile rank of 43. The combo's rank is a direct consequence of the severe mismatch between the CPU's capabilities and the GPU's limitations.
The Intel Core i7-12700K is an exceptionally strong processor, with an average benchmark score of 35684 and a percentile rank of 89 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, which is only 0.3% faster, and the Intel Core i7-13700T, which is 0.6% slower. This places the CPU in the top tier of desktop processors, yet it is paired with a GPU that ranks in the 43rd percentile. The result is a combo that is dramatically underutilized; the CPU's potential is largely wasted because the GPU cannot feed it enough frames to matter.
The rank of 1703 out of 1744 is a stark indicator that this pairing is far from optimal. The data suggests that most other tested combos, even those with weaker CPUs, achieve better overall performance in Overpower because they pair more balanced components. The combo's position near the bottom of the list is not a reflection of the CPU's quality but rather proof of how heavily the GPU drags down the overall result.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1080p, the combo delivers 60.7 FPS on Low, which is the only setting that reaches a playable 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset drops to 38.4 FPS, High falls to 35.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 29.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 31.6 FPS, a 52% reduction, highlighting the significant cost of higher graphical fidelity.
At 1440p, the Low preset still manages 53.2 FPS, but Medium and High are nearly identical at 32.7 and 32.6 FPS, respectively. This convergence suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth becomes the limiting factor, as the difference between Medium and High is negligible. Ultra at 1440p drops to 23.6 FPS, which is only 0.3 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result, reinforcing the earlier observation that Ultra settings overwhelm the GPU regardless of resolution.
At 4K, the results are uniformly poor. Low achieves 47.7 FPS, which is still below the 60 FPS target. Medium drops to 26.4 FPS, High to 29.8 FPS, and Ultra to 23.3 FPS. Interestingly, High at 4K (29.8 FPS) is actually faster than Medium at 4K (26.4 FPS), a quirk that may indicate driver-level optimizations or game-specific preset scaling that does not behave linearly. The 4K Low result of 47.7 FPS is the only 4K figure that approaches playability, but it still falls short of a smooth experience.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The CPU's performance is exceptional, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29241 and single-core score of 4128. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and max-thread score of 9979 further demonstrate its strength in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.
In Overpower, however, the CPU's role is largely passive. The data shows that the frame rates are consistently low across all resolutions and settings, which indicates that the CPU is rarely, if ever, the bottleneck. The fact that 1080p Low (60.7 FPS) is the only result above 60 FPS suggests that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is still the limiting factor. If the CPU were the constraint, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different resolutions at the same settings, but the resolution scaling data clearly shows the GPU's influence.
The CPU's 25 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory are irrelevant in this context, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 128.1 GB/s bandwidth are the hard limits. The i7-12700K's 89th percentile rank among all CPUs stands in stark contrast to the combo's 1703rd rank out of 1744, underscoring the imbalance. This CPU is capable of driving far more powerful GPUs, but in this pairing, its performance headroom is entirely untapped. The benchmark results indicate that the GTX 1650 simply cannot translate the CPU's computational prowess into higher frame rates in Overpower.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 47.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 26.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 23.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 53.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 32.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 32.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 23.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 60.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 38.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 35.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 29.1 |
Overpower with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with GTX 1650 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + GTX 1650
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.