Overpower

The Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination delivers a solidly playable experience in Overpower, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and settings increase. The benchmark data shows a system where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU maintains a consistent foundation across all tested configurations.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the Low preset, the average frame rate drops from 178 FPS at 1080p to 159 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 19 FPS, and then further to 135 FPS at 4K, representing a total drop of 43 FPS from the 1080p baseline. This scaling behavior indicates that even at the lowest graphical settings, the rendering load at higher resolutions begins to tax the GPU significantly.

Moving to the Medium preset, the pattern continues with average FPS figures of 111 at 1080p, 99 at 1440p, and 84 at 4K. The percentage decrease from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings is approximately 24%, which is slightly less severe than the 24% drop observed at Low settings, suggesting that the additional graphical features at Medium do not disproportionately impact the GPU relative to raw pixel count. The High preset shows a similar trend: 103 FPS at 1080p, 92 FPS at 1440p, and 78 FPS at 4K, with the 1080p to 4K reduction totaling 25 FPS.

The Ultra preset exhibits the most constrained performance, with averages of 86 FPS at 1080p, 76 FPS at 1440p, and 65 FPS at 4K. This represents a 21 FPS drop from the lowest to highest resolution tested. Notably, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra (10 FPS drop) is proportionally similar to the scaling from 1440p to 4K (11 FPS drop), indicating that the GPU is being pushed near its limits across all resolutions when maximum settings are applied.

The data strongly suggests that the Radeon RX 7700 XT is the limiting component in this pairing as resolution increases. The consistent FPS reductions across every preset when moving from 1080p to 4K point to pixel throughput and memory bandwidth constraints rather than CPU limitations. At 4K Ultra, the average of 65 FPS remains above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, but the margin is thin, and the system clearly favors lower resolutions for higher frame rate headroom.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 provides the processing foundation for this combination, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads operating with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The processor belongs to the Alder Lake architecture family, built on Intel's 10 nm process node, and includes 18 MB of shared L3 cache alongside 1.25 MB per core of L2 cache. This configuration is well-suited for Overpower's action-oriented gameplay, where consistent frame pacing depends on the CPU's ability to feed draw calls and game logic to the GPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, the i5-12400 demonstrates a single-thread score of 910 in 3DMark and 2257 in Cinebench R23 single-core, indicating capable per-thread performance for game engine tasks that rely on a primary rendering thread. Multi-threaded results are robust as well, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15989 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 8564. The processor's average benchmark score of 18683 places it in the 72nd percentile among all CPUs tested, positioning it as a mid-to-upper tier processor for gaming workloads.

The nearest rivals in the CPU database provide context for the i5-12400's standing. The AMD EPYC 7643 scores 18697, a negligible 0.1% difference, while the Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730, 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 leads the group with a score of 18811, 0.7% ahead, and the Intel Core i3-14100F trails at 18519, 0.9% behind. These extremely tight margins indicate that the i5-12400's performance envelope is well-matched to its peers, and no single rival offers a decisive advantage in general compute tasks.

In the context of Overpower's measured results, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU. The fact that FPS scales downward consistently with resolution, even at Low settings where CPU overhead would be most apparent, suggests that the 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The processor's 65 W TDP and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide flexibility for system builders, while its Intel Socket 1700 compatibility and PCIe Gen 5 support offer a modern platform foundation.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the measured FPS patterns. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and the data shows it handles 4K adequately as well. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz, which are aggressive clocks for the RDNA 3.0 architecture.

The RX 7700 XT includes 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines, along with 54 ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities are rated at 35.17 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations, and the pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s alongside a texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s provide the throughput necessary for high-resolution rendering. The GPU's average benchmark score of 22549 places it in the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rivals clustered closely around it.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435, a 0.5% difference, while the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729, 0.8% higher. The RTX 2080 leads with 22895, 1.5% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 trails at 22170, 1.7% behind. This tight grouping indicates that the RX 7700 XT's raw performance is highly competitive with those alternatives, and in Overpower specifically, the measured FPS confirms its capability.

The GPU's 245 W TDP and dual-slot cooling design, with a length of 267 mm, are typical for this performance class. The memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is a key factor in the 4K results, where the 12 GB frame buffer must accommodate higher resolution textures and geometry. The fact that 4K Ultra still averages 65 FPS suggests that the memory subsystem is adequate for the game's demands, though the 12 GB capacity may become a consideration for future titles with heavier VRAM requirements.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. The Low preset averages 178 FPS, providing an exceptionally smooth experience suitable for high refresh rate displays. Medium settings reduce the average to 111 FPS with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS, indicating stable frame pacing. High settings average 103 FPS, while Ultra drops to 86 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 92 FPS difference, demonstrating the significant impact of graphical settings on performance.

At 2560x1440, the averages decrease uniformly. Low settings yield 159 FPS, Medium averages 99 FPS with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 114 FPS, High averages 92 FPS, and Ultra averages 76 FPS. The 1440p results maintain playability across all presets, with even the most demanding Ultra setting staying above 75 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 84 FPS suggests that frame drops are controlled, providing a consistent experience during intense action sequences.

At 3840x2160, the system remains viable but the margins tighten. Low settings average 135 FPS, Medium averages 84 FPS with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS, High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra averages 65 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 72 FPS is notable, as it indicates the system can maintain reasonably smooth performance during demanding scenes even at 4K. The Ultra preset at 65 FPS average is the lowest measured result, but it still exceeds the 60 FPS target for most displays.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently offers the best balance of average FPS and minimum FPS stability. The minimum FPS data is only provided for Medium settings, with values of 95 FPS at 1080p, 84 FPS at 1440p, and 72 FPS at 4K. These minimums are within 15-17% of their respective averages, indicating that the Radeon RX 7700 XT maintains consistent performance without severe frame rate drops.

FAQ

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 4K with High settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 78 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary limiter, as FPS consistently decreases with resolution across all settings, while the CPU's 6-core/12-thread configuration appears sufficient to avoid bottlenecking.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 7700 XT's average benchmark score of 22549 is 0.5% higher than the RTX 5060 Mobile, 0.8% lower than the RTX 4060 Mobile, 1.5% lower than the RTX 2080, and 1.7% higher than the RX 5700.

Q: What is the best resolution for maintaining high frame rates above 100 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080, all presets except Ultra maintain averages above 100 FPS, with Low achieving 178 FPS and High achieving 103 FPS. At 1440p, only Low exceeds 100 FPS with 159 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings at any resolution?

A: Yes, Ultra settings are playable at all tested resolutions, with averages of 86 FPS at 1080p, 76 FPS at 1440p, and 65 FPS at 4K, all above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the i5-12400 rank among all CPUs?

A: The processor's average benchmark score of 18683 places it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, with its closest rival being the AMD EPYC 7643 at a 0.1% difference.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium provides 111 FPS average with a 95 FPS minimum, which is a substantial improvement over the 86 FPS average of Ultra while still offering enhanced visuals over Low. The 95 FPS minimum ensures that even during demanding sequences, the frame rate remains well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 1440p, Medium delivers 99 FPS average with an 84 FPS minimum, making it the only preset besides Low that maintains an average near 100 FPS. The 84 FPS minimum is acceptable for competitive play, and the visual upgrade from Low to Medium is generally noticeable in modern games. For users with 144 Hz displays, this preset provides the best chance of approaching higher refresh rates without compromising on graphical fidelity.

At 4K, Medium averages 84 FPS with a minimum of 72 FPS, which is the strongest combination of visual quality and performance at this resolution. The High preset at 78 FPS and Ultra at 65 FPS both sacrifice too much frame rate for marginal visual gains, while Low at 135 FPS does not justify the loss of graphical features. The Medium preset's minimum of 72 FPS provides a safety margin against frame drops that could dip below 60 FPS in intense scenes.

For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, Ultra at 1080p (86 FPS) or 1440p (76 FPS) remains viable, but the data suggests that Medium offers the best overall experience for the majority of players. The consistent minimum FPS data for Medium across all resolutions indicates that this preset is well-optimized for the RX 7700 XT's architecture, providing predictable performance without unexpected stutters.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT ranks 1398 out of 3713 tested combinations in Overpower, placing it in the top 37.6% of all systems evaluated. This ranking reflects the balanced nature of the pairing, where the CPU's 72nd percentile standing and the GPU's 67th percentile standing combine to deliver consistent performance across the game's resolution and settings matrix.

The ranking position is notable given the individual component percentiles. The CPU's 72nd percentile rank is slightly higher than the GPU's 67th percentile, suggesting that the processor provides a slight performance headroom advantage over the graphics card in this specific game. However, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, meaning the CPU's additional headroom is not fully utilized at 4K settings.

Among the 3713 tested combos, this system's rank of 1398 indicates it outperforms a majority of alternatives while not reaching the top tier of configurations. The FPS data supports this positioning, with the system achieving playable frame rates at all tested settings and resolutions, but without the extreme performance margins seen in higher-end combinations. The RX 7700 XT's close grouping with its rivals, all within 1.7% of each other in average benchmark scores, suggests that this combo's ranking is largely determined by the GPU's position in the market, with the CPU offering sufficient support to avoid limiting performance.

The 4K Ultra result of 65 FPS average is particularly relevant to the ranking, as it demonstrates that this mid-range combination can handle the most demanding settings at the highest resolution, even if the margin above 60 FPS is modest. This capability places the combo in a favorable position for users seeking a single system capable of high refresh rate 1080p gaming and playable 4K performance.