Overpower

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER pairing in Overpower delivers a combination of high-core-count processing and flagship-class graphics. The CPU brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This processor sits in the 87th percentile among all CPUs tested, indicating strong multi-threaded capability that is relevant for a game that can utilize its 16 threads. Its performance profile is tight against immediate rivals: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores within 0.1% of it, while the Intel Core 5 221E trails by just 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 leads by 0.4%. The Intel Core i9-13905H is the furthest competitor at 0.6% ahead in average benchmark score.

The Ryzen 7 7700's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth) provide a solid foundation for feeding the GPU. In synthetic tests, it achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 1049 and a max-thread score of 8479, showing a balanced design. For Overpower, the CPU's role is to maintain high minimum frame rates and avoid bottlenecks, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is less taxed. The 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier suggest efficiency and headroom, but the data confirms that even at stock settings, this processor is sufficient to drive the RTX 4080 SUPER to its limits in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Overpower, this specific pairing of the Ryzen 7 7700 and RTX 4080 SUPER holds the 258th position out of 3,713 total combos. This places it in the top 7% of all tested configurations, which is a strong result for a high-end desktop setup. The rank reflects the synergy between the two components; the CPU's 87th percentile standing and the GPU's 86th percentile standing combine to produce a system that is well above average, though not at the absolute top tier.

The ranking suggests that while this combo is elite, there are 257 other configurations that achieve higher average FPS in Overpower. These likely include combinations with even more powerful CPUs (such as those with higher multi-thread scores) or GPUs with marginally better raw performance. The gap to the top is not defined in the data, but the percentile scores indicate that both components are near the peak of their respective categories. For context, the RTX 4080 SUPER's average benchmark score of 54,209 is only 0.1% below the standard RTX 4080, making the performance difference between those two cards negligible in this context. This combo's rank confirms the balanced nature of the pairing, where neither component severely limits the other in Overpower.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals how the system scales across resolutions, providing insight into which component becomes the limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 268 FPS, which drops to 204 FPS at 4K with the same settings. This 24% reduction in frame rate as resolution increases by 4x indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on more work, but the CPU is still able to keep up with the demand at lower settings.

The scaling pattern changes with higher settings. At Ultra settings, the frame rate goes from 130 FPS at 1080p to 98 FPS at 4K, a 25% drop. This consistency across settings suggests a well-balanced system where neither component is heavily bottlenecked. However, looking at the Medium preset data, which includes min and max FPS, the story becomes clearer. At 1080p Medium, the average is 168 FPS with a min of 143 FPS, while at 4K Medium, the average drops to 127 FPS with a min of 108 FPS. The min-to-average ratio remains similar (85% at 1080p and 85% at 4K), indicating that frame pacing is stable even as resolution increases.

The data shows that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions, as the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is roughly proportional to the pixel count increase. The CPU's role becomes more pronounced at 1080p, where the 268 FPS Low result suggests the Ryzen 7 7700 can push well beyond 200 FPS without breaking a sweat. At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth are fully utilized, and the FPS figures align with what a high-end card should deliver in a demanding action title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 268, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the CPU is not limiting at all. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 168 FPS, with a minimum of 143 FPS and a maximum of 193 FPS. This 100 FPS drop from Low to Medium suggests that the GPU is starting to work harder, but the frame times remain consistent. High settings produce 156 FPS average, while Ultra settings yield 130 FPS average. The scaling from Medium to Ultra shows a 22% reduction in FPS, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the results are as follows: Low settings hit 240 FPS average, which is still very high. Medium settings average 150 FPS, with a minimum of 127 FPS and a maximum of 172 FPS. High settings produce 139 FPS average, and Ultra settings drop to 115 FPS average. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at the same settings is consistent, around 10-12% reduction, which is expected as the pixel count increases by 78%. This indicates that the GPU is scaling efficiently with resolution, and the CPU is not introducing any significant overhead.

At 3840x2160, the system still performs admirably. Low settings achieve 204 FPS average, which is remarkable for 4K. Medium settings average 127 FPS, with a minimum of 108 FPS and a maximum of 147 FPS. High settings produce 118 FPS average, and Ultra settings yield 98 FPS average. The drop from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings is 15% (115 to 98 FPS), which is less than the pixel increase would suggest, indicating that the GPU is still not fully maxed out. The min FPS at 4K Medium (108 FPS) is above the 100 FPS threshold, suggesting a smooth experience even in demanding scenes.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the centerpiece of this configuration, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs, along with 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. Its base clock is 2295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, and the memory runs at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective). These specifications place it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 34,245 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600.

In Overpower, the GPU's role is dominant at higher resolutions and settings. The 4K Ultra result of 98 FPS average demonstrates that the card can handle the most demanding settings without dropping below 60 FPS, which is a common target for smooth gameplay. The 16 GB VRAM is likely sufficient for the game's textures at 4K, as there is no evidence of memory-related stuttering in the min FPS data. The GPU's nearest rivals show how close the performance is: the RTX 4080 (non-SUPER) is only 0.1% faster in average score, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.7% slower. This suggests that the RTX 4080 SUPER is a well-positioned card for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance.

The GPU's 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design are notable, but the measured FPS indicates that the card maintains its boost clocks effectively under load. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 19,822 is strong, but for gaming, the DirectX 12 score of 134 (in Passmark's specific test) is more relevant, and the card excels in this area. Overall, the RTX 4080 SUPER provides a 30% performance uplift over the Low-to-Ultra settings at 4K, but the data shows that even at Low settings, the frame rates are high enough to take advantage of 200 Hz displays.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal balance between visual quality and performance depends on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 130 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a fully immersive experience. The High preset at 156 FPS is also excellent, but the incremental gain over Ultra (20%) may not justify the visual compromise. For competitive play, the Low preset at 268 FPS is unmatched, but most players will prefer the graphical fidelity of Medium (168 FPS) or High.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 139 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a near-140 FPS experience that is smooth on high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset at 115 FPS is also viable for those who prioritize image quality, as it remains above the 100 FPS mark. The Medium preset at 150 FPS is a good middle ground, with a min FPS of 127 that ensures no major dips. For 1440p gaming, High is recommended as it balances the 139 FPS average with better shadows and effects compared to Medium.

At 3840x2160, the High preset at 118 FPS is the best recommendation for a premium 4K experience, as it stays above 100 FPS and provides excellent detail. The Ultra preset at 98 FPS is also playable, but the dip below 100 FPS may be noticeable on some displays. The Medium preset at 127 FPS is an alternative for those who want higher frame rates, with a min FPS of 108 that ensures smooth gameplay. Given the data, High at 4K is the recommended preset, as it offers the best combination of visual fidelity and performance, with the Ultra preset being a close second for enthusiasts who prioritize graphics over raw FPS.