Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 97 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 45 | 54 | 70 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 84 | 100 | 130 |
| 1080p Full HD | 99 | 130 | 155 | 202 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Minimum, with 4K remaining a viable option only at lower settings. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy where the CPU's substantial 24-core configuration ensures the GPU is the primary bottleneck at most settings, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth dictate the ceiling at higher resolutions.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution to play Minimum with this hardware?*
A: The measured data indicates 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At Medium settings, the combo produces an average of 100 FPS (min 85, max 115), which is a strong balance of visual fidelity and smoothness. While 1920x1080 yields higher averages (up to 202 FPS on Low), the 1440p results provide a more immersive experience without sacrificing performance.
Q: How does the RTX 4060 perform in this game compared to its direct rivals?
A: According to the benchmark database, the RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17,639, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17,666, which is a negligible 0.2% difference. The AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5% behind, showing the 4060 sits in a tightly contested performance band.
Q: Is the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus a bottleneck for the RTX 4060?
A: No. The CPU's benchmark results, such as a 44,253 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 5,068 single-thread score in Passmark, are far superior to what the GPU can demand. The data shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor, especially at 4K, where the average FPS drops to 45 on High settings, indicating the CPU has ample headroom.
Q: What settings should be used for a 60 FPS target at 4K?
A: For a stable 60 FPS experience at 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only viable option, achieving an average of 70 FPS. The Medium preset falls short with an average of 54 FPS, and the High preset averages only 45 FPS, so users must sacrifice visual quality to maintain a playable frame rate at this resolution.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combination ranks 1,549 out of 2,939 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the 53rd percentile, meaning it outperforms slightly more than half of all tested systems while being beaten by a significant portion, reflecting a mid-to-upper tier standing for 1080p and 1440p gaming.
Q: Does the game benefit more from the CPU's multi-core or single-core performance?
A: The game's performance scales with settings and resolution, which points to GPU dependency. However, the CPU's robust single-core score of 3,453 in Cinebench R20 ensures frame pacing is consistent, preventing CPU-related stutters. The multi-core score of 24,461 in the same test provides overhead for background tasks, but it is not the primary driver of FPS in this title.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the dominant component in this configuration for Minimum. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s, which proves sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The GPU's boost clock of 2460 MHz and base clock of 1830 MHz allow it to reach an average of 202 FPS at 1080p Low, showing its raw compute ability. However, the data reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution increases, with the 4K Ultra preset dropping to just 34 FPS.
The GPU's VRAM capacity is directly correlated with the measured results. At 3840x2160, the High preset (45 FPS) and Ultra preset (34 FPS) likely strain the 8 GB frame buffer, causing the significant drop-off. In contrast, the 1440p Medium preset maintains a comfortable 100 FPS average, suggesting the memory allocation is well within limits. The 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 236.2 GTexel/s texture rate handle the game's geometry and effects efficiently at lower resolutions, but the 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate is insufficient for the demands of 4K high-fidelity rendering.
The GPU's position at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17,639, is consistent with its performance here. It trades blows with the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which has a nearly identical average score, but the architectural advantages of Ada Lovelace are not fully realized in a game that seems to be memory-bandwidth sensitive. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, the RTX 4060 is a capable performer, but the data suggests its 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint at 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and RTX 4060 combination secures a rank of 1,549 out of 2,939 tested combos in Minimum. This position, placing it in the 53rd percentile, indicates that while the system is competent, there are many configurations that deliver higher frame rates. The ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU's mid-range standing; the CPU's performance is not a limiting factor, as it ranks in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.
The data shows that the combo's rank is a direct consequence of the GPU's 61st percentile standing. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 93,785, is far ahead of its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P, which scores 93,786, a 0% difference. This suggests that pairing a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a balanced but not exceptional system. The combo's rank would likely be higher if the GPU were not the bottleneck, but as it stands, it outperforms 1,390 other combos while trailing 1,389.
To contextualize, the GPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon 780M with a 0.3% lower score, would likely produce similar in-game results, meaning the combo's rank is representative of a specific performance tier. The 1440p results, where the combo achieves 100 FPS on Medium, are a strong indicator of its capability, but the 4K results pull the overall rank down. This is a system built for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming or solid 1440p play, not for 4K enthusiasts.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides a clear directive for optimal settings. For 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 130 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play, while the Medium preset offers 155 FPS for even smoother motion. The Ultra preset, at 99 FPS, is still highly playable and provides the best visual quality without dropping below the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset, at 202 FPS, is unnecessary unless the user has a 240Hz monitor and prioritizes frame rate above all else.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. It produces an average of 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 FPS, ensuring consistent performance during intense combat. The High preset, at 84 FPS, is also viable, but the Medium preset offers a better balance of visual quality and frame rate stability. The Ultra preset, at 64 FPS, is playable but leaves little headroom for drops, while the Low preset, at 130 FPS, sacrifices too much visual fidelity.
For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only way to achieve a playable experience, averaging 70 FPS. The Medium preset, at 54 FPS, is below the 60 FPS target, and the High and Ultra presets, at 45 FPS and 34 FPS respectively, are not recommended. Users with 4K displays should either accept the reduced visual quality of the Low preset or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080:
- Low: The highest average FPS recorded in the entire dataset at 202 FPS, indicating the game is heavily GPU-bound at this resolution and the CPU's power is fully unchallenged.
- Medium: Averages 155 FPS with a minimum of 131 FPS and a maximum of 178 FPS, providing a wide performance margin for high-refresh-rate displays.
- High: Averages 130 FPS, a significant drop from Medium but still exceptionally smooth for most monitors.
- Ultra: Averages 99 FPS, remaining above the 60 FPS threshold and offering the best image quality at this resolution.
2560x1440:
- Low: Averages 130 FPS, showing the resolution increase has a modest impact on the GPU's performance.
- Medium: Averages 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS, representing a stable and playable experience.
- High: Averages 84 FPS, which is just below the 85 FPS minimum of the Medium preset, showing a clear performance cost for higher settings.
- Ultra: Averages 64 FPS, which is at the edge of playability but may suffer from occasional dips below 60 FPS.
3840x2160:
- Low: Averages 70 FPS, the only preset at this resolution to exceed the 60 FPS target, albeit with significant visual compromises.
- Medium: Averages 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS, indicating inconsistent performance that would be noticeable in gameplay.
- High: Averages 45 FPS, a substantial drop that makes the game feel sluggish.
- Ultra: Averages 34 FPS, which is not recommended for any serious play.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. Its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. These specifications make it a formidable CPU that is far more powerful than what Minimum requires.
In this game, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data and maintain frame pacing. The benchmark results show its strength: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 and a single-core score of 2,439. The Passmark single-thread score of 5,068 is particularly relevant for gaming, as it ensures the game's main thread is handled efficiently. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms it is not a bottleneck.
The data supports this analysis. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 202 FPS, which is likely near the game's engine limit, as the GPU is not powerful enough to push much higher. At 1440p and 4K, the FPS drops are consistent with GPU limitations, not CPU ones. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and support for DDR5 memory ensure data transfer is not a constraint. This processor is overkill for this GPU in this title, but it provides substantial headroom for future upgrades or more demanding games.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 70.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 45.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 130.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 100.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 84.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 202.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 130.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 99.0 |
Minimum with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 270K Plus + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.