Minimum

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M paired with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H delivers a playable experience in Minimum across most settings, but the data indicates that the game’s demands scale steeply with resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo is capable of high refresh rates, while 3840x2160 proves demanding, requiring settings adjustments to maintain smooth performance. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s capabilities are sufficient to feed the graphics card at lower settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal preset depends entirely on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the High preset provides an excellent balance, delivering 111 FPS on average. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and leaves headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to 85 FPS, which is still very playable, but the 26 FPS gain from choosing High over Ultra is substantial for a visual fidelity increase that may not be noticeable in a fast-paced shooter. For players with high refresh rate monitors, the Low preset at 173 FPS is the clear choice, offering the maximum frame rate possible in the measured data.

At 2560x1440, the High preset remains the recommended starting point, producing 72 FPS on average. This is acceptable for most players, though it is a significant 39 FPS drop from the same preset at 1080p. The Medium preset at 85 FPS is a better option for those prioritizing frame rate over visual quality, as the 13 FPS difference between Medium and High is relatively small. The Ultra preset at 55 FPS is borderline, and the data suggests that this setting should only be used if the player can tolerate occasional dips below 60 FPS. The Low preset at 112 FPS is the fastest option, but the visual compromise is likely too severe for most users.

For 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset achieves 60 FPS on average, which is the minimum for a consistent experience, but it is the only preset that reaches this threshold. The Medium preset drops to 46 FPS, and the High preset falls to 39 FPS, both of which are below the ideal smoothness target. The Ultra preset at 29 FPS is generally unplayable for a shooter genre. Therefore, at 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option for maintaining a stable frame rate, while players should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p to unlock higher quality settings.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU combo in Minimum?*

A: The data indicates that 1920x1080 is the sweet spot, with the High preset achieving 111 FPS and the Low preset reaching 173 FPS. At 2560x1440, performance is still acceptable, but the High preset drops to 72 FPS, and at 3840x2160, only the Low preset manages to hit 60 FPS.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High in terms of performance?

A: Across all resolutions, the Ultra preset imposes a significant performance penalty. At 1080p, the drop from High to Ultra is 26 FPS (111 to 85). At 1440p, the drop is 17 FPS (72 to 55), and at 4K, the drop is 10 FPS (39 to 29). The visual improvements from Ultra are not justified by these frame rate losses.

Q: Is the game more CPU-bound or GPU-bound with this hardware?

A: The benchmark results suggest that the game becomes increasingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops by roughly 35% from 1080p to 1440p and another 45% from 1440p to 4K at the High preset. This scaling pattern indicates the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, while the CPU is more relevant at 1080p.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 85 FPS for the Medium preset at 2560x1440, with a minimum of 73 FPS and a maximum of 98 FPS. This is a solid choice for a balance between visual quality and smoothness.

*Q: Does the combo have enough power for 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Only the Low preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 60 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 46 FPS, and the High preset to 39 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, the settings must be set to Low, which may not be visually desirable for all players.

Q: How does the combo rank against other tested configurations?

A: The combo is ranked 1934 out of 2939 tested combos for this game, placing it in the lower third of configurations. This ranking reflects the overall performance across all settings and resolutions, indicating that while the combo is capable, many other hardware pairings deliver higher frame rates.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support provide a solid foundation for gaming workloads. In Minimum, the CPU’s role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The benchmark data shows that at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, the combo achieves 173 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of handling high frame rate scenarios without becoming a bottleneck.

However, the CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor in this game at higher resolutions. The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a decrease of roughly 35%, which is typical of GPU-bound scenarios. The processor’s single-thread performance, as indicated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1743, is adequate for the game’s engine. The multi-core score of 15028 in Cinebench R23 also indicates that the CPU has ample headroom for background tasks while gaming.

The data suggests that the Core Ultra 7 155H is more than sufficient for Minimum, as the frame rates are consistently higher at lower resolutions where CPU load is more significant. The processor’s 16 cores and 22 threads are more than what this game requires, and the boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures responsive frame pacing. The CPU is not the component that prevents the combo from achieving higher frame rates at 4K; rather, the GPU’s rendering capabilities are the constraint. The processor’s Passmark single-thread score of 3468 further confirms its capability in gaming scenarios, where single-core performance often matters more than raw multi-threaded throughput.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon RX 7800M is ranked 1934 out of 2939 tested combos for Minimum. This places it in the 34th percentile of all configurations, meaning that approximately two-thirds of tested hardware pairings deliver better performance in this game. The ranking is based on the aggregate performance across all measured settings and resolutions, and it reflects the combo’s mixed results: strong at 1080p but weaker at 4K.

The CPU’s individual benchmark percentile is 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all CPUs in general compute tasks. The GPU’s percentile is 73, showing it is above average but not top-tier. The combination of these two components, however, does not translate into a high game-specific ranking. This discrepancy suggests that the game’s engine may not fully utilize the hardware’s capabilities, or that the GPU’s performance at higher resolutions drags down the overall score. The nearest rivals for the CPU, such as the Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, have nearly identical average scores, but the game’s ranking shows that other factors influence Minimum’s performance.

The rank of 1934 indicates that for competitive play, where high and consistent frame rates are crucial, this combo may not be the ideal choice. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo is competitive, but at 1440p and 4K, it falls behind configurations with more powerful GPUs. For a third-person shooter, the frame rate drops at higher resolutions could be a disadvantage in fast-paced encounters, where maintaining a high refresh rate is often more important than visual fidelity. The combo’s ranking suggests it is better suited for 1080p gaming or for players who are willing to compromise on settings at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the High preset, the average frame rate drops from 111 FPS at 1080p to 72 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 39 FPS or 35%. When moving from 1440p to 4K, the frame rate drops further to 39 FPS, a reduction of 33 FPS or 46%. This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the number of pixels rendered has a direct impact on performance.

The Medium preset shows a similar trend, with 133 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 85 FPS at 1440p (a 36% decrease) and then to 46 FPS at 4K (a 46% decrease). The Low preset follows the same pattern: 173 FPS at 1080p, 112 FPS at 1440p (a 35% drop), and 60 FPS at 4K (a 46% drop). The consistency of these percentage drops across presets strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would not scale so predictably with resolution.

The data also shows that the gap between the Low and High presets widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and High is 62 FPS, while at 4K, the difference is only 21 FPS. This suggests that the GPU’s pixel throughput is the primary constraint at 4K, and even reducing the settings from High to Low cannot fully compensate for the increased pixel count. The Radeon RX 7800M’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the game’s textures, but the 35.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K with high-quality settings. The resolution scaling analysis confirms that this combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p, where the GPU can deliver smooth performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 173 FPS, which is exceptionally high and suitable for competitive play. The Medium preset averages 133 FPS, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS, providing a solid balance. The High preset averages 111 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset averages 85 FPS, which is playable but represents a significant drop from the other presets.

At 2560x1440, performance remains respectable but shows the GPU’s limitations. The Low preset averages 112 FPS, maintaining a high frame rate. The Medium preset averages 85 FPS, with a minimum of 73 FPS and a maximum of 98 FPS, ensuring a stable experience. The High preset averages 72 FPS, which is acceptable for most players. The Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS target and may result in noticeable stuttering in fast-paced scenes.

At 3840x2160, performance is constrained. The Low preset averages 60 FPS, just meeting the standard for smooth playback. The Medium preset averages 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS, which is noticeable for a shooter. The High preset averages 39 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 29 FPS, both of which are generally considered too low for a competitive third-person shooter. The data shows that 4K gaming is only viable with the Low preset, and even then, the frame rate is marginal.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is the dominant component in this combo, and its specifications directly explain the measured performance. The GPU features 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, with a boost clock of 2335 MHz. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for the game’s assets at all resolutions. The GPU’s 35.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are key indicators of its rendering capabilities.

In Minimum, the GPU’s role is to handle the majority of the rendering workload, and the data shows that it becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent with a GPU that is limited by its pixel throughput and fill rate. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 17613 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, which is above average but not exceptional. The nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, have similar average scores, confirming that the RX 7800M is a mid-to-high-end mobile GPU.

The GPU’s 60 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate do not significantly impact performance in this game, as Minimum is not ray-tracing heavy. The RDNA 3.0 architecture and 5 nm process node from TSMC contribute to the GPU’s efficiency, allowing it to sustain high clock speeds. The 180 W TDP is notable for a mobile GPU, and the fact that it is integrated (IGP slot width) suggests it is designed for high-performance laptops. The data indicates that the GPU is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but its performance at 4K is a limiting factor for the entire combo.