Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
75
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 37 39 53
1440p QHD 49 62 75 101
1080p Full HD 76 99 121 156

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 53
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Ultra 27
2560x1440 Low 101
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 High 62
2560x1440 Ultra 49
1920x1080 Low 156
1920x1080 Medium 121
1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Ultra 76

Minimum with Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600, In-Depth Analysis

Opening

The benchmark data for Minimum with the Intel Core i7-14700K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 presents a clear picture of a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics card at higher resolutions. Across the twelve measured configurations, the CPU's substantial processing power (20 cores, 28 threads, boosting to 5.60 GHz) remains largely underutilized as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, particularly when moving from 1080p to 4K. The scores reveal a predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase, with the most significant frame rate drops occurring between 1440p and 2160p. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to understand the roles of each component, the impact of settings, and where this combination stands relative to other tested systems.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K has a dramatic effect on the measured frame rates, clearly indicating that the Radeon RX 6600 is the limiting component in this pairing. At 1080p with High settings, the system averages 99.3 FPS, while at 1440p the same settings drop to 62.1 FPS, a reduction of roughly 37%. The step to 4K is even more punishing, with the High preset yielding just 37.1 FPS. This steep decline—over 62% from 1080p to 4K—is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU has ample headroom but the graphics card cannot keep up with the increasing pixel count.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the system achieves 156.2 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 101.3 FPS at 1440p and then plummets to 53.1 FPS at 4K. The relative drop from 1440p to 4K is particularly steep, with the Low preset losing nearly half its frame rate. This suggests that the RX 6600's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become severely stressed at 4K, regardless of the graphical load. The data indicates that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, allowing the CPU to push frame rates high enough to take advantage of high-refresh displays, while 4K gaming is only viable at the cost of significant visual fidelity.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a high-end processor that places in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70074. Its architecture features 20 cores (a mix of performance and efficiency cores) and 28 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. In synthetic tests, the CPU demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capabilities, scoring 44534 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 18704 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6287.

However, the measured FPS data for Minimum suggests that this CPU power is largely untapped. At 1080p Low settings, the system hits 156.2 FPS, which is a solid result, but the fact that frame rates drop so precipitously at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU, not the CPU, is determining performance. The CPU's nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-14700KF (average score 70104) and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (70420), are within 0.5% of its performance, yet none of this headroom translates into higher FPS at 4K. This is a classic case of a CPU that can easily feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU's rendering limits become the hard ceiling as resolution scales.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide a clear hierarchy of settings for each resolution, and the data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance between visual quality and playable frame rates for most scenarios. At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers 121 FPS, which is only slightly below the High preset's 99.3 FPS and well above the Ultra preset's 76.2 FPS. The jump from Medium to High at 1080p costs roughly 22 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs another 23 FPS, making Ultra the least efficient choice.

At 1440p, the Medium preset provides 75.3 FPS, which is a comfortable level for smooth gameplay. High settings drop to 62.1 FPS, which is still playable but begins to show signs of strain. Ultra at 1440p falls to 49.2 FPS, which is marginal for a third-person shooter. At 4K, none of the presets achieve a fully smooth experience; Medium yields 39.2 FPS, High yields 37.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 27.3 FPS. The Low preset at 4K (53.1 FPS) is the only option that approaches playability, but it sacrifices significant visual detail. For the best experience, the data points to Medium settings at 1080p or 1440p, where the system can maintain frame rates above 75 FPS without resorting to the lowest quality presets.

How This Combo Ranks

In the context of all tested combos, the Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 ranks 1410 out of 1733 combinations for Minimum. This places it in the bottom 20% of systems, which is unsurprising given the GPU's relatively modest performance. The RX 6600 sits in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25235, and its nearest rivals—such as the AMD Radeon 890M (25246) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (25120)—are within 0.5% of its score. This suggests that the GPU is a mid-range part that struggles with the demands of 4K gaming.

The low combo rank is a direct consequence of the GPU bottleneck, as the CPU's high percentile ranking (96th) cannot compensate for the graphics card's limitations. The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can compete with higher-end systems, but at 1440p and especially 4K, it falls behind. The rank of 1410 out of 1733 reflects the reality that many other GPU-CPU pairings, even with weaker processors, would achieve higher FPS in Minimum at higher resolutions due to a more balanced configuration.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a mid-range graphics card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, with a Navi 23 chip manufactured on a 7 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, with a boost clock of 2491 MHz. Its theoretical performance is rated at 8.928 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The measured FPS data clearly shows that the RX 6600 is the primary constraint on performance. At 1080p, the GPU can push frame rates above 150 FPS at Low settings, but the moment resolution increases, the pixel throughput requirement overwhelms its capabilities. The 4K results are particularly telling: even at Low settings, the card only manages 53.1 FPS, and at Ultra it drops to 27.3 FPS. This indicates that the 8 GB VRAM buffer and the 128-bit memory bus are insufficient for 4K workloads, causing bandwidth limitations that cripple performance. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the RX 580 2048SP (25287) and the RX 6700M (25180), perform similarly, confirming that this is a consistent limitation of the card's class.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured frame rates provides a detailed view of the system's behavior across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 156.2 FPS at Low, 121 FPS at Medium, 99.3 FPS at High, and 76.2 FPS at Ultra. This represents a smooth scaling curve, with each step up in settings costing roughly 20-25 FPS. The 1080p results are all playable, with even the Ultra preset maintaining a respectable 76 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly: Low yields 101.3 FPS, Medium 75.3 FPS, High 62.1 FPS, and Ultra 49.2 FPS. The scaling here is less linear, with the gap between Low and Medium (26 FPS) being larger than the gap between Medium and High (13 FPS). This suggests that the GPU is beginning to struggle with the increased pixel count, and the settings are having a diminishing impact on performance.

At 3840x2160, the performance collapses further: Low yields 53.1 FPS, Medium 39.2 FPS, High 37.1 FPS, and Ultra 27.3 FPS. The differences between Medium, High, and Ultra are small (2-10 FPS), indicating that the GPU is so heavily bottlenecked that changes in settings have little effect. The 4K data shows that this combo is not viable for a smooth gaming experience at any preset, with the best result being just above 50 FPS at the lowest quality settings. These numbers confirm that the RX 6600 is the definitive limiting factor, and the i7-14700K's power is never fully utilized beyond 1080p.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700K

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6600

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2491 MHz MHz
TDP 132 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600 in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 53.1
3840x2160 Medium 39.2
3840x2160 High 37.1
3840x2160 Ultra 27.3
2560x1440 Low 101.3
2560x1440 Medium 75.3
2560x1440 High 62.1
2560x1440 Ultra 49.2
1920x1080 Low 156.2
1920x1080 Medium 121.0
1920x1080 High 99.3
1920x1080 Ultra 76.2

Minimum with ii7-14700K + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 6600 + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700K + RX 6600

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.